Primary care online training on multifactorial breast cancer risk: pre-post evaluation study.

IF 2.5 Q2 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
BJGP Open Pub Date : 2025-04-15 DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0305
Francisca Stutzin Donoso, Juliet A Usher-Smith, Lorenzo Ficorella, Antonis C Antoniou, Jon Emery, Marc Tischkowitz, Tim Carver, Douglas F Easton, Fiona M Walter, Stephanie Archer
{"title":"Primary care online training on multifactorial breast cancer risk: pre-post evaluation study.","authors":"Francisca Stutzin Donoso, Juliet A Usher-Smith, Lorenzo Ficorella, Antonis C Antoniou, Jon Emery, Marc Tischkowitz, Tim Carver, Douglas F Easton, Fiona M Walter, Stephanie Archer","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It is estimated that>250,000 women in the United Kingdom (UK) are at increased risk of breast cancer, but only a small fraction are identified. Digital tools, such as CanRisk, enable multifactorial breast cancer risk assessment. Implementation of such tools within primary care would allow primary care professionals (PCPs) to reassure women at population-level risk and identify those at increased risk who will benefit most from targeted prevention or early detection. Previous studies suggest that PCPs will require educational resources to support the delivery of multifactorial breast cancer risk assessments.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To develop and evaluate a new 'Multifactorial breast cancer risk assessment in primary care' online training for UK PCPs.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>35 PCPs from across the UK participated in the evaluation and data collection was completed online between May and July 2024.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Evidence-based training development and mixed-methods pre-post evaluation study. Statistical analysis for the evaluation focused on the primary outcome of objective knowledge and mean changes were analysed with a paired sample t-test. Qualitative feedback was analysed using content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Objective knowledge showed a significant mean increase (<i>P</i>=0.011,95% CI). Subjective knowledge and confidence scores also showed significant mean increases (<i>P</i><0.001, 95% CI). Results on satisfaction, engagement, and relevance of the training were positive.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 'Multifactorial breast cancer risk assessment in primary care' online training significantly increases PCPs' knowledge and confidence to conducting multifactorial breast cancer risk assessments, and it was well received by PCPs.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0305","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: It is estimated that>250,000 women in the United Kingdom (UK) are at increased risk of breast cancer, but only a small fraction are identified. Digital tools, such as CanRisk, enable multifactorial breast cancer risk assessment. Implementation of such tools within primary care would allow primary care professionals (PCPs) to reassure women at population-level risk and identify those at increased risk who will benefit most from targeted prevention or early detection. Previous studies suggest that PCPs will require educational resources to support the delivery of multifactorial breast cancer risk assessments.

Aim: To develop and evaluate a new 'Multifactorial breast cancer risk assessment in primary care' online training for UK PCPs.

Design & setting: 35 PCPs from across the UK participated in the evaluation and data collection was completed online between May and July 2024.

Method: Evidence-based training development and mixed-methods pre-post evaluation study. Statistical analysis for the evaluation focused on the primary outcome of objective knowledge and mean changes were analysed with a paired sample t-test. Qualitative feedback was analysed using content analysis.

Results: Objective knowledge showed a significant mean increase (P=0.011,95% CI). Subjective knowledge and confidence scores also showed significant mean increases (P<0.001, 95% CI). Results on satisfaction, engagement, and relevance of the training were positive.

Conclusion: The 'Multifactorial breast cancer risk assessment in primary care' online training significantly increases PCPs' knowledge and confidence to conducting multifactorial breast cancer risk assessments, and it was well received by PCPs.

多因素乳腺癌风险的初级保健在线培训:前后评估研究。
背景:据估计,在英国(UK)约有50万名女性患乳腺癌的风险增加,但只有一小部分被确定。数字工具,如CanRisk,使多因素乳腺癌风险评估成为可能。在初级保健中实施这些工具将使初级保健专业人员(pcp)能够使处于人口风险水平的妇女放心,并确定那些风险增加的妇女将从有针对性的预防或早期发现中获益最多。先前的研究表明,pcp将需要教育资源来支持提供多因素乳腺癌风险评估。目的:为英国pcp开发和评估一种新的“初级保健中多因素乳腺癌风险评估”在线培训。设计与设置:来自英国各地的35家pcp参与了评估,数据收集于2024年5月至7月在线完成。方法:循证培训发展和混合方法前后评价研究。评价的统计分析侧重于客观知识和平均变化的主要结局,采用配对样本t检验进行分析。采用内容分析法对定性反馈进行分析。结果:客观知识平均有显著提高(P=0.011,95% CI)。结论:“初级保健中多因素乳腺癌风险评估”在线培训显著提高了初级保健人员开展多因素乳腺癌风险评估的知识和信心,受到初级保健人员的好评。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJGP Open
BJGP Open Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信