Development of patient reported outcome measures assessing tumor pain intensity and tumor pain interference for individuals with neurofibromatosis type 1 and plexiform neurofibromas: qualitative findings.

IF 2.4 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Nour Al Ghriwati, Kari Struemph, Staci Martin, Paige Little, Melissa Baker, Jason Levine, Cynthia MacKenzie, James Tonsgard, Elizabeth K Schorry, Karin S Walsh, Pamela L Wolters
{"title":"Development of patient reported outcome measures assessing tumor pain intensity and tumor pain interference for individuals with neurofibromatosis type 1 and plexiform neurofibromas: qualitative findings.","authors":"Nour Al Ghriwati, Kari Struemph, Staci Martin, Paige Little, Melissa Baker, Jason Levine, Cynthia MacKenzie, James Tonsgard, Elizabeth K Schorry, Karin S Walsh, Pamela L Wolters","doi":"10.1186/s41687-025-00877-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pain is a common symptom in individuals with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) that often is associated with plexiform neurofibroma (pNF) tumors. To date, no patient-reported outcome measures have been validated specifically to assess pNF-related pain intensity or pain interference in this population. Such measures are sorely needed since pain is being considered as an outcome in clinical trials targeting reduction of pNF. The study aims were to: (1) obtain qualitative information from individuals with NF1 and pNFs about their pain and its measurement and (2) modify existing scales to assess pNF-related pain intensity and pain interference for NF1 clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For this multi-site, qualitative study, 56 individuals (26 children, 6-16 years; 30 adults, 18-68 years) with NF1 and pNF participated in a focus group and/or individual interview about pain intensity and pain interference (concept elicitation) and also provided feedback about existing pain measures (Numeric Rating Scale-11 and Pain Interference Index) assessing these domains (cognitive debriefing). Four additional waves of cognitive debriefing interviews further refined the measures. Qualitative concept elicitation data from transcripts were coded, analyzed using NVivo software, and thematic analysis was conducted using both deductive and inductive techniques. Additional themes and systematic problems and suggestions regarding the measures were gleaned from reviewing the field notes and interview transcriptions generated by the cognitive debriefing sessions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Concept elicitation themes included descriptions of two types of pNF-related pain (chronic and episodic), variability of pain over time, varying ability to recall pain, lack of knowledge of pNFs, and the ways pain interferes with daily activities. Cognitive debriefing themes included information on how to rate pNF-related pain intensity apart from other pain; problems and suggestions regarding the measures included difficulty comprehending some items and preferences for alternative wording and formatting. Based on these qualitative results, the measures' instructions, items, and formatting were modified to create the PAin INtensity Scale for plexiform neurofibromas (PAINS-pNF) and the Pain Interference Index for plexiform neurofibromas (PII-pNF) for administration on a mobile app or web-based platform.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The PAINS-pNF and PII-pNF are promising self-report measures developed using patient engagement to evaluate tumor pain intensity and pain interference in NF1 clinical trials. The second phase of the study to provide reliability, validity, and normative data for individuals with NF1 and pNFs ages 8 years and older is underway.</p>","PeriodicalId":36660,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes","volume":"9 1","pages":"46"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12044096/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-025-00877-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pain is a common symptom in individuals with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) that often is associated with plexiform neurofibroma (pNF) tumors. To date, no patient-reported outcome measures have been validated specifically to assess pNF-related pain intensity or pain interference in this population. Such measures are sorely needed since pain is being considered as an outcome in clinical trials targeting reduction of pNF. The study aims were to: (1) obtain qualitative information from individuals with NF1 and pNFs about their pain and its measurement and (2) modify existing scales to assess pNF-related pain intensity and pain interference for NF1 clinical trials.

Methods: For this multi-site, qualitative study, 56 individuals (26 children, 6-16 years; 30 adults, 18-68 years) with NF1 and pNF participated in a focus group and/or individual interview about pain intensity and pain interference (concept elicitation) and also provided feedback about existing pain measures (Numeric Rating Scale-11 and Pain Interference Index) assessing these domains (cognitive debriefing). Four additional waves of cognitive debriefing interviews further refined the measures. Qualitative concept elicitation data from transcripts were coded, analyzed using NVivo software, and thematic analysis was conducted using both deductive and inductive techniques. Additional themes and systematic problems and suggestions regarding the measures were gleaned from reviewing the field notes and interview transcriptions generated by the cognitive debriefing sessions.

Results: Concept elicitation themes included descriptions of two types of pNF-related pain (chronic and episodic), variability of pain over time, varying ability to recall pain, lack of knowledge of pNFs, and the ways pain interferes with daily activities. Cognitive debriefing themes included information on how to rate pNF-related pain intensity apart from other pain; problems and suggestions regarding the measures included difficulty comprehending some items and preferences for alternative wording and formatting. Based on these qualitative results, the measures' instructions, items, and formatting were modified to create the PAin INtensity Scale for plexiform neurofibromas (PAINS-pNF) and the Pain Interference Index for plexiform neurofibromas (PII-pNF) for administration on a mobile app or web-based platform.

Conclusions: The PAINS-pNF and PII-pNF are promising self-report measures developed using patient engagement to evaluate tumor pain intensity and pain interference in NF1 clinical trials. The second phase of the study to provide reliability, validity, and normative data for individuals with NF1 and pNFs ages 8 years and older is underway.

1型神经纤维瘤病和丛状神经纤维瘤患者报告的评估肿瘤疼痛强度和肿瘤疼痛干扰的结果测量的发展:定性发现。
背景:疼痛是1型神经纤维瘤病(NF1)患者的常见症状,通常与丛状神经纤维瘤(pNF)肿瘤相关。到目前为止,还没有患者报告的结果测量被专门验证来评估pnf相关的疼痛强度或疼痛干扰。这些措施是迫切需要的,因为在临床试验中,疼痛被认为是减少pNF的一个结果。本研究的目的是:(1)从NF1和pnf患者中获得关于疼痛及其测量的定性信息;(2)修改现有量表,以评估NF1临床试验中与pnf相关的疼痛强度和疼痛干扰。方法:对56例个体进行多地点定性研究(儿童26例,6-16岁;30名患有NF1和pNF的成年人(18-68岁)参加了关于疼痛强度和疼痛干扰(概念启发)的焦点小组和/或个人访谈,并提供了评估这些领域的现有疼痛测量(数字评定量表-11和疼痛干扰指数)的反馈(认知汇报)。另外四波认知汇报访谈进一步完善了这些测量方法。对转录本的定性概念启发数据进行编码,使用NVivo软件进行分析,并使用演绎和归纳技术进行主题分析。关于这些措施的其他主题、系统问题和建议是通过审查实地记录和认知情况汇报会议产生的采访记录收集到的。结果:概念启发主题包括描述两种类型的pnf相关疼痛(慢性和发作性),疼痛随时间的变化,疼痛回忆能力的变化,缺乏pnf知识,以及疼痛干扰日常活动的方式。认知汇报主题包括如何评估与pnf相关的疼痛强度以及其他疼痛;有关这些措施的问题和建议包括难以理解某些项目以及对替代措辞和格式的偏好。根据这些定性结果,对测量的说明、项目和格式进行修改,以创建丛状神经纤维瘤疼痛强度量表(PAINS-pNF)和丛状神经纤维瘤疼痛干扰指数(PII-pNF),以便在移动应用程序或网络平台上管理。结论:在NF1临床试验中,PAINS-pNF和PII-pNF是很有前途的自我报告测量方法,通过患者参与来评估肿瘤疼痛强度和疼痛干扰。该研究的第二阶段正在进行中,旨在为8岁及以上的NF1和pNFs患者提供可靠性、有效性和规范性数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes Health Professions-Health Information Management
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
120
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信