Engaging Scientists in Science Policy: Experiences From Canada.

IF 3.5 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
PUBLIC HEALTH REVIEWS Pub Date : 2025-04-25 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/phrs.2025.1607130
Steven Lâm, Sarah Raza, Lisa Hansen
{"title":"Engaging Scientists in Science Policy: Experiences From Canada.","authors":"Steven Lâm, Sarah Raza, Lisa Hansen","doi":"10.3389/phrs.2025.1607130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Training scientists in science policy is crucial to enhance scientific advice for decision-making. However, there are limited opportunities for scientists to receive such training.</p><p><strong>Analysis: </strong>We reflected on our participation in a one-year postgraduate science policy fellowship program in Canada. Although recently discontinued in 2023, this fellowship allowed us to refine practical policy skills, contribute to policy outputs that advanced our office's mandate, and access career pathways beyond academia.</p><p><strong>Policy options: </strong>Recognizing the value of engaging scientists in policy, we advocate for continued offerings of science policy training, alongside rigorous evaluation to inform program changes. Additionally, we encourage increased financial support early on for graduate students to sustain a talent pool of scientists who will become future science policy leaders. Lastly, we urge more scientists and students to be active in science policy spaces.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>By openly sharing our experiences and learnings from the fellowship, we seek to contribute to ongoing discussions on the importance of science policy training and its role in bridging the gap between science and decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":35944,"journal":{"name":"PUBLIC HEALTH REVIEWS","volume":"46 ","pages":"1607130"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12061685/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PUBLIC HEALTH REVIEWS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/phrs.2025.1607130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Training scientists in science policy is crucial to enhance scientific advice for decision-making. However, there are limited opportunities for scientists to receive such training.

Analysis: We reflected on our participation in a one-year postgraduate science policy fellowship program in Canada. Although recently discontinued in 2023, this fellowship allowed us to refine practical policy skills, contribute to policy outputs that advanced our office's mandate, and access career pathways beyond academia.

Policy options: Recognizing the value of engaging scientists in policy, we advocate for continued offerings of science policy training, alongside rigorous evaluation to inform program changes. Additionally, we encourage increased financial support early on for graduate students to sustain a talent pool of scientists who will become future science policy leaders. Lastly, we urge more scientists and students to be active in science policy spaces.

Conclusion: By openly sharing our experiences and learnings from the fellowship, we seek to contribute to ongoing discussions on the importance of science policy training and its role in bridging the gap between science and decision-making.

科学家参与科学政策:来自加拿大的经验。
背景:对科学家进行科学政策培训对于加强科学决策咨询至关重要。然而,科学家接受这种培训的机会有限。分析:我们回顾了在加拿大参加为期一年的研究生科学政策奖学金项目。虽然该奖学金最近于2023年终止,但它使我们能够完善实际的政策技能,为推进我们办公室任务的政策产出做出贡献,并获得学术界以外的职业发展途径。政策选择:认识到让科学家参与政策制定的价值,我们主张继续提供科学政策培训,同时进行严格的评估,为项目变更提供信息。此外,我们鼓励尽早增加对研究生的财政支持,以维持将成为未来科学政策领导者的科学家人才库。最后,我们敦促更多的科学家和学生积极参与科学政策空间。结论:通过公开分享我们的经验和学习,我们寻求为正在进行的关于科学政策培训的重要性及其在弥合科学与决策之间差距方面的作用的讨论做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PUBLIC HEALTH REVIEWS
PUBLIC HEALTH REVIEWS Nursing-Community and Home Care
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
1.80%
发文量
47
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信