Community engagement to support public health: mixed-method evaluation evidence on COVID-19 attitudes and practices in Lao PDR.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Global Health Action Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-25 DOI:10.1080/16549716.2025.2485523
Marco J Haenssgen, Elizabeth M Elliott, Sandra Bode, Ounkham Souksavanh, Thongkhoon Xayyahong, Hironori Okabayashi, Shogo Kubota
{"title":"Community engagement to support public health: mixed-method evaluation evidence on COVID-19 attitudes and practices in Lao PDR.","authors":"Marco J Haenssgen, Elizabeth M Elliott, Sandra Bode, Ounkham Souksavanh, Thongkhoon Xayyahong, Hironori Okabayashi, Shogo Kubota","doi":"10.1080/16549716.2025.2485523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Community engagement has been recognized as a key tool for supporting national health agendas, and experiences from the COVID-19 pandemic can offer important lessons for tackling future global health challenges such as antimicrobial resistance. This paper provides much-needed evaluation knowledge on relational community engagement initiatives and their impact on COVID-19-related attitudes and practices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A two-round mixed-method evaluative study to examine outcome indicators related to COVID-19-prevention and health-seeking behavior was implemented from October 2022 to December 2023 among 14 diverse case study communities in four Lao provinces. Data involved 50 semi-structured interviews with villagers, 50 key informant interviews, and two rounds of complete census surveys (3,161 survey observations incl. matched panel data from 618 individuals) to discern outcomes among villagers with different levels of activity participation in a difference-in-difference analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Relative to non-participating villagers, villagers participating in the activities had higher COVID-19 vaccine uptake (+0.13 doses), higher public healthcare utilization for presentations consistent with COVID-19 (e.g. fever and neurological and/or respiratory symptoms; +69.4% points), and less antibiotic use per illness episode (-0.2 antibiotic use episodes). However, the activity raised worries to disclose a COVID-19-positive status and was often interpreted as a health education campaign.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Relational community engagement offers a respectful way of addressing persistent healthcare challenges and supporting vulnerable populations - and thus holds key for ongoing global health priorities such as emerging infectious disease responses and antimicrobial resistance. We recommend that community engagement initiatives become a standard component of national health policy portfolios beyond the scope of COVID-19.</p>","PeriodicalId":49197,"journal":{"name":"Global Health Action","volume":"18 1","pages":"2485523"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Health Action","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2025.2485523","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Community engagement has been recognized as a key tool for supporting national health agendas, and experiences from the COVID-19 pandemic can offer important lessons for tackling future global health challenges such as antimicrobial resistance. This paper provides much-needed evaluation knowledge on relational community engagement initiatives and their impact on COVID-19-related attitudes and practices.

Methods: A two-round mixed-method evaluative study to examine outcome indicators related to COVID-19-prevention and health-seeking behavior was implemented from October 2022 to December 2023 among 14 diverse case study communities in four Lao provinces. Data involved 50 semi-structured interviews with villagers, 50 key informant interviews, and two rounds of complete census surveys (3,161 survey observations incl. matched panel data from 618 individuals) to discern outcomes among villagers with different levels of activity participation in a difference-in-difference analysis.

Results: Relative to non-participating villagers, villagers participating in the activities had higher COVID-19 vaccine uptake (+0.13 doses), higher public healthcare utilization for presentations consistent with COVID-19 (e.g. fever and neurological and/or respiratory symptoms; +69.4% points), and less antibiotic use per illness episode (-0.2 antibiotic use episodes). However, the activity raised worries to disclose a COVID-19-positive status and was often interpreted as a health education campaign.

Conclusions: Relational community engagement offers a respectful way of addressing persistent healthcare challenges and supporting vulnerable populations - and thus holds key for ongoing global health priorities such as emerging infectious disease responses and antimicrobial resistance. We recommend that community engagement initiatives become a standard component of national health policy portfolios beyond the scope of COVID-19.

社区参与支持公共卫生:老挝人民民主共和国关于COVID-19态度和做法的混合方法评估证据。
背景:社区参与已被公认为支持国家卫生议程的关键工具,2019冠状病毒病大流行的经验可为应对未来的全球卫生挑战(如抗微生物药物耐药性)提供重要教训。本文为关系社区参与倡议及其对covid -19相关态度和做法的影响提供了急需的评估知识。方法:于2022年10月至2023年12月在老挝4个省的14个不同案例研究社区实施两轮混合方法评估研究,以检查与covid -19预防和就医行为相关的结局指标。数据包括50次对村民的半结构化访谈、50次对关键信息人的访谈和两轮完整的人口普查调查(3161次调查观察,包括来自618个人的匹配面板数据),以通过差异中差异分析来区分不同活动参与水平的村民的结果。结果:与未参加活动的村民相比,参加活动的村民COVID-19疫苗接种率更高(+0.13剂),以符合COVID-19的症状(如发热、神经和/或呼吸道症状)就诊的公共卫生服务利用率更高;+69.4%分),每次疾病发作抗生素使用减少(-0.2次抗生素使用)。但是,这一活动引发了公开新冠病毒阳性的担忧,并经常被解读为健康教育活动。结论:关系型社区参与为解决持续存在的卫生保健挑战和支持弱势群体提供了一种相互尊重的方式,因此是当前全球卫生优先事项(如新发传染病应对和抗菌素耐药性)的关键。我们建议社区参与举措成为COVID-19范围之外国家卫生政策组合的标准组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Health Action
Global Health Action PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
108
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Health Action is an international peer-reviewed Open Access journal affiliated with the Unit of Epidemiology and Global Health, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine at Umeå University, Sweden. The Unit hosts the Umeå International School of Public Health and the Umeå Centre for Global Health Research. Vision: Our vision is to be a leading journal in the global health field, narrowing health information gaps and contributing to the implementation of policies and actions that lead to improved global health. Aim: The widening gap between the winners and losers of globalisation presents major public health challenges. To meet these challenges, it is crucial to generate new knowledge and evidence in the field and in settings where the evidence is lacking, as well as to bridge the gaps between existing knowledge and implementation of relevant findings. Thus, the aim of Global Health Action is to contribute to fuelling a more concrete, hands-on approach to addressing global health challenges. Manuscripts suggesting strategies for practical interventions and research implementations where none already exist are specifically welcomed. Further, the journal encourages articles from low- and middle-income countries, while also welcoming articles originated from South-South and South-North collaborations. All articles are expected to address a global agenda and include a strong implementation or policy component.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信