Evaluation of fusion status in patients with minimum 1-year survival post-oncologic spinal fusion.

IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Seth Wilson, Jacob Ward, Anas Bardeesi, Santino Cua, Vicente de Paulo Martins Coelho, Mark Damante, Daniel Kreatsoulas, J Bradley Elder, Joshua Palmer, David Xu, Vikram Chakravarthy
{"title":"Evaluation of fusion status in patients with minimum 1-year survival post-oncologic spinal fusion.","authors":"Seth Wilson, Jacob Ward, Anas Bardeesi, Santino Cua, Vicente de Paulo Martins Coelho, Mark Damante, Daniel Kreatsoulas, J Bradley Elder, Joshua Palmer, David Xu, Vikram Chakravarthy","doi":"10.1016/j.spinee.2025.04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background context: </strong>Oncologic patients have significant medical comorbidities which may impact arthrodesis after spine surgery. Furthermore, there is a paucity of published data describing fusion rates, and arthrodesis quality.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In this study, we present institutional data for patients with minimum 1-year survival who underwent spinal fusion secondary to treatment of metastatic spine disease.</p><p><strong>Study design/setting: </strong>Retrospective cohort study done at a single tertiary medical center.</p><p><strong>Patient sample: </strong>Patients were selected from a single institution between 2012 and 2022. Included patients had spinal fusion as part of oncologic treatment, minimum of 1 year follow up, and postoperative Computed Tomography (CT) scan at minimum 1 year.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Patient outcomes included fusion status and Hounsfield units (HU) on CT scan at 1 year.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective chart review was performed collecting demographic and treatment information including postoperative oncologic and radiation treatment as well as HU along the cranial and caudal pedicles bilaterally on the 1-year CT scan. Indications for surgery included symptomatic metastatic disease. All surgeries were performed by 1 of 3 surgeons at a single tertiary medical center. Statistical analysis was performed using the Student T-Test and Chi-Squared Test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 74 patients presenting with metastatic spine disease who met inclusion criteria. Demographics included an average age of 61.9 years at time of surgery, median construct length of 6 levels, and median survival was 43.2 months. Our cohort demonstrated complete and partial fusion rates of 11.1% and 59.5%, respectively. There was a significant difference in average HU for patients demonstrating fusion at 1 year, 444.2 compared to those demonstrating a lack of fusion, 285.8 (p<.0001). Patients who received postoperative radiation had higher postoperative HU than those who did not receive radiotherapy (411.1 vs. 304.9, p=.042). There was no significant difference in fusion status based on postoperative chemotherapy status, p=.127. Additionally, there was no difference in HU based on SBRT versus conventional radiotherapy, p=.588.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Partial fusion was seen in over half of the study cohort at 1-year follow-up; complete fusion was seen in 11% of patients. Fused patients and those who received postoperative chemotherapy had significantly higher HU on 1-year CT. Maximizing control of cancer burden as well as improving bone quality may help patients with metastatic spine disease demonstrate bony fusion. More research is indicated to evaluate causal implications of survival in patients with metastatic spine disease that have undergone spinal fusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":49484,"journal":{"name":"Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2025.04.002","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background context: Oncologic patients have significant medical comorbidities which may impact arthrodesis after spine surgery. Furthermore, there is a paucity of published data describing fusion rates, and arthrodesis quality.

Purpose: In this study, we present institutional data for patients with minimum 1-year survival who underwent spinal fusion secondary to treatment of metastatic spine disease.

Study design/setting: Retrospective cohort study done at a single tertiary medical center.

Patient sample: Patients were selected from a single institution between 2012 and 2022. Included patients had spinal fusion as part of oncologic treatment, minimum of 1 year follow up, and postoperative Computed Tomography (CT) scan at minimum 1 year.

Outcome measures: Patient outcomes included fusion status and Hounsfield units (HU) on CT scan at 1 year.

Methods: Retrospective chart review was performed collecting demographic and treatment information including postoperative oncologic and radiation treatment as well as HU along the cranial and caudal pedicles bilaterally on the 1-year CT scan. Indications for surgery included symptomatic metastatic disease. All surgeries were performed by 1 of 3 surgeons at a single tertiary medical center. Statistical analysis was performed using the Student T-Test and Chi-Squared Test.

Results: There were 74 patients presenting with metastatic spine disease who met inclusion criteria. Demographics included an average age of 61.9 years at time of surgery, median construct length of 6 levels, and median survival was 43.2 months. Our cohort demonstrated complete and partial fusion rates of 11.1% and 59.5%, respectively. There was a significant difference in average HU for patients demonstrating fusion at 1 year, 444.2 compared to those demonstrating a lack of fusion, 285.8 (p<.0001). Patients who received postoperative radiation had higher postoperative HU than those who did not receive radiotherapy (411.1 vs. 304.9, p=.042). There was no significant difference in fusion status based on postoperative chemotherapy status, p=.127. Additionally, there was no difference in HU based on SBRT versus conventional radiotherapy, p=.588.

Conclusion: Partial fusion was seen in over half of the study cohort at 1-year follow-up; complete fusion was seen in 11% of patients. Fused patients and those who received postoperative chemotherapy had significantly higher HU on 1-year CT. Maximizing control of cancer burden as well as improving bone quality may help patients with metastatic spine disease demonstrate bony fusion. More research is indicated to evaluate causal implications of survival in patients with metastatic spine disease that have undergone spinal fusion.

肿瘤脊柱融合术后至少存活1年的患者融合状态的评估。
背景:肿瘤患者有明显的合并症,可能影响脊柱手术后的关节融合术。此外,缺乏描述融合率和关节融合术质量的已发表数据。目的:在这项研究中,我们提供了在转移性脊柱疾病治疗后接受脊柱融合术的患者至少1年生存率的机构数据。研究设计/环境:在单一三级医疗中心进行回顾性队列研究。患者样本:患者从2012年至2022年的单一机构中选择。纳入的患者接受脊柱融合术作为肿瘤治疗的一部分,至少1年随访,术后至少1年CT扫描。结果测量:患者结果包括融合状态和1年CT扫描的Hounsfield单位(HU)。方法:回顾性回顾图表,收集人口统计学和治疗信息,包括术后肿瘤和放射治疗,以及1年CT扫描沿颅和尾椎弓根两侧的HU。手术指征包括有症状的转移性疾病。所有手术均由同一三级医疗中心的3名外科医生中的1名进行。采用学生t检验和卡方检验进行统计分析。结果:74例符合纳入标准的转移性脊柱疾病患者。人口统计学包括手术时的平均年龄为61.9岁,中位构造长度为6个级别,中位生存期为43.2个月。我们的队列显示完全和部分融合率分别为11.1%和59.5%。1年融合患者的平均HU值为444.2,而未融合患者的平均HU值为285.8(结论:在1年随访中,超过一半的研究队列出现部分融合;11%的患者出现完全融合。融合患者和术后化疗患者在1年CT上的HU明显升高。最大限度地控制癌症负担以及改善骨质量可能有助于转移性脊柱疾病患者实现骨融合。更多的研究表明,以评估因果关系的生存的转移性脊柱疾病的患者进行脊柱融合术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Spine Journal
Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
680
审稿时长
13.1 weeks
期刊介绍: The Spine Journal, the official journal of the North American Spine Society, is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original, peer-reviewed articles on research and treatment related to the spine and spine care, including basic science and clinical investigations. It is a condition of publication that manuscripts submitted to The Spine Journal have not been published, and will not be simultaneously submitted or published elsewhere. The Spine Journal also publishes major reviews of specific topics by acknowledged authorities, technical notes, teaching editorials, and other special features, Letters to the Editor-in-Chief are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信