The Outcomes of Delayed Revascularization in Lower Extremity Vascular Injury: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 0.6 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
K S Chai, W I Faisham, W A Wan-Sulaiman, M A Rosli, A Z Mat-Saad, M H Jusoh, M Paiman, A S Halim
{"title":"The Outcomes of Delayed Revascularization in Lower Extremity Vascular Injury: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"K S Chai, W I Faisham, W A Wan-Sulaiman, M A Rosli, A Z Mat-Saad, M H Jusoh, M Paiman, A S Halim","doi":"10.5704/MOJ.2503.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There is no consensus yet whether delayed limb salvage procedures with an \"ischemic time\" of more than 6 hours are worthwhile, as these repairs are often complicated by reperfusion injury. Our study aims to determine the outcomes of delayed revascularization to validate our current treatment approach and assess areas for future improvement.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective cohort study on a highly selected group of patients who underwent delayed revascularization surgery for lower extremity traumatic vascular injuries in our institution from January 2008 to June 2018. Exclusion criteria include the presence of a terminal non-salvageable ischemic limb; defined as a gangrenous extremity evident by non-blanchable, mottled skin with complete limb paralysis, renal trauma, known renal impairment, and those with an ischemic time less than 6 hours. The demographic data, type and level of vascular, type of injuries, duration of ischemia, MESS score, and the need for secondary amputation were assessed. <b>Result:</b> Fifty-nine patients were identified and included in the analysis. Fifty patients (84.7%) were male, while 9 patients (15.3%) were female. The mean age was 28.1 years. The most injured vessel was the popliteal artery (n=41, 69.5%). The commonest injury pattern was contusion with thrombosis (n=31, 52.5%). Revascularizations were mainly achieved by interposition saphenous vein graft (n=40, 67.8%). The mean duration of delayed was 14.1 hours. A total of 83.1% of patients (n=49) had a Mangled Extremity Severity Scoring (MESS) of 7 and above. The limb salvage rate in this study was 89.8%, with only 6 patients (12.2%) requiring secondary amputations. Thirty-one patients developed rhabdomyolysis, with 6 cases (19.4%) requiring temporary inpatient renal replacement therapy (RRT). Out of the six, only one patient required lifelong RRT.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Limb salvage in those with the duration of delayed of more than 6 hours should be attempted after careful assessment and a high rate of limb salvage, minimal renal complication and acceptable functional (mobility) outcomes can be achieved, despite the reperfusion injury that accompanies.</p>","PeriodicalId":45241,"journal":{"name":"Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal","volume":"19 1","pages":"57-65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12022703/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5704/MOJ.2503.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: There is no consensus yet whether delayed limb salvage procedures with an "ischemic time" of more than 6 hours are worthwhile, as these repairs are often complicated by reperfusion injury. Our study aims to determine the outcomes of delayed revascularization to validate our current treatment approach and assess areas for future improvement.

Material and methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study on a highly selected group of patients who underwent delayed revascularization surgery for lower extremity traumatic vascular injuries in our institution from January 2008 to June 2018. Exclusion criteria include the presence of a terminal non-salvageable ischemic limb; defined as a gangrenous extremity evident by non-blanchable, mottled skin with complete limb paralysis, renal trauma, known renal impairment, and those with an ischemic time less than 6 hours. The demographic data, type and level of vascular, type of injuries, duration of ischemia, MESS score, and the need for secondary amputation were assessed. Result: Fifty-nine patients were identified and included in the analysis. Fifty patients (84.7%) were male, while 9 patients (15.3%) were female. The mean age was 28.1 years. The most injured vessel was the popliteal artery (n=41, 69.5%). The commonest injury pattern was contusion with thrombosis (n=31, 52.5%). Revascularizations were mainly achieved by interposition saphenous vein graft (n=40, 67.8%). The mean duration of delayed was 14.1 hours. A total of 83.1% of patients (n=49) had a Mangled Extremity Severity Scoring (MESS) of 7 and above. The limb salvage rate in this study was 89.8%, with only 6 patients (12.2%) requiring secondary amputations. Thirty-one patients developed rhabdomyolysis, with 6 cases (19.4%) requiring temporary inpatient renal replacement therapy (RRT). Out of the six, only one patient required lifelong RRT.

Conclusion: Limb salvage in those with the duration of delayed of more than 6 hours should be attempted after careful assessment and a high rate of limb salvage, minimal renal complication and acceptable functional (mobility) outcomes can be achieved, despite the reperfusion injury that accompanies.

下肢血管损伤延迟血运重建的结果:一项回顾性队列研究。
导读:目前尚未达成共识的是,“缺血时间”超过6小时的延迟肢体保留手术是否值得,因为这些修复通常伴有再灌注损伤。我们的研究旨在确定延迟血运重建的结果,以验证我们目前的治疗方法,并评估未来改进的领域。材料和方法:我们对2008年1月至2018年6月在我院接受下肢创伤性血管损伤延迟血运重建术的患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。排除标准包括存在终末期不可修复的缺血性肢体;定义为四肢坏疽,明显表现为不能漂白,皮肤斑纹,肢体完全瘫痪,肾外伤,已知肾损害,缺血时间小于6小时。评估人口统计学数据、血管类型和水平、损伤类型、缺血持续时间、MESS评分和二次截肢的必要性。结果:59例患者被识别并纳入分析。男性50例(84.7%),女性9例(15.3%)。平均年龄28.1岁。损伤最多的血管是腘动脉(n=41, 69.5%)。最常见的损伤类型为血栓形成性挫伤(n=31, 52.5%)。血管重建术主要通过间置隐静脉移植实现(n=40, 67.8%)。平均延迟时间为14.1小时。83.1%的患者(n=49)四肢损伤严重程度评分(MESS)在7分及以上。本研究残肢保留率为89.8%,仅有6例(12.2%)患者需要二次截肢。31例患者出现横纹肌溶解,其中6例(19.4%)需要临时住院肾替代治疗(RRT)。在这六名患者中,只有一名患者需要终身RRT。结论:对于延迟时间超过6小时的患者,应在仔细评估后尝试保肢,尽管伴随再灌注损伤,但保肢率高,肾脏并发症少,功能(活动能力)可接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
104
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes original papers and case reports three times a year in both printed and electronic version. The purpose of MOJ is to disseminate new knowledge and provide updates in Orthopaedics, trauma and musculoskeletal research. It is an Open Access journal that does not require processing fee or article processing charge from the authors. The Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal is the official journal of Malaysian Orthopaedic Association (MOA) and ASEAN Orthopaedic Association (AOA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信