Exploring the dosimetric advantages of a novel multi-modality radiotherapy platform in prostate cancer.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Jie Duan, Qinghui Yun, Zhongfei Wang, Te Zhang, Xiaohuan Sun, Hua Yang, Weiwei Li, Wei Wang, Hongfei Sun, Liting Chen, Yue Gao, Zhiwei Wei, Zhe Wang, Lina Zhao
{"title":"Exploring the dosimetric advantages of a novel multi-modality radiotherapy platform in prostate cancer.","authors":"Jie Duan, Qinghui Yun, Zhongfei Wang, Te Zhang, Xiaohuan Sun, Hua Yang, Weiwei Li, Wei Wang, Hongfei Sun, Liting Chen, Yue Gao, Zhiwei Wei, Zhe Wang, Lina Zhao","doi":"10.1007/s13246-025-01544-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present research aims to explore the dosimetric advantages associated with a novel multi-modality radiotherapy platform TaiChiB, which integrates a medical linac and a focused <sup>60</sup>Co γ-ray system. The primary focus of this investigation is to assess the efficacy of this platform in the treatment of prostate cancer. A retrospective study was conducted involving fifteen prostate patients. Each patient had two different treatment plans: a Varian linac x-ray plan (group A), and a TaiChiB plan combined with linac x rays and focused γ rays (group B). In both plan groups, the prescribed dose to the planning target volume (PTV) was 50 Gy, with a boost dose of 20 Gy to the gross tumor volume (GTV). In the TaiChiB plan, the primary plan was delivered using linac x rays and the boost dose plan was delivered using γ rays. Different criteria were used to evaluate the plan quality and results from the two plan groups were compared through statistical analysis (p < 0.05 as significantly different). All plans from these two groups met the clinical requirements for treatment, and Gamma passing rates were above 95% using the 3%/2 mm criterion suggested by TG-218. Regarding the dose coverage to targets, the TaiChiB plan group had a higher mean dose to the GTV (77.46 ± 1.04 Gy (B) vs. 71.40 ± 0.33 Gy (A), p < 0.01), whereas it maintained a comparable mean dose to the PTV (55.33 ± 1.76 Gy (B) vs. 55.23 ± 1.92 Gy (A), non-significant). In terms of dose to organs-at-risk (OARs), the TaiChiB plan group showed a lower or comparable mean value. In detail, bladder V<sub>45Gy</sub> (43.90 ± 6.34% (B) vs. 49.83 ± 6.31% (A), p < 0.01); rectum V<sub>45Gy</sub> (38.45 ± 14.38% (B) vs. 51.46 ± 17.18%(A), p < 0.01); intestine V<sub>45Gy</sub> (163.88 ± 18.85 cm<sup>3</sup> (B) vs. 177.18 ± 18.20 cm<sup>3</sup> (A), p < 0.01); left femoral head V<sub>30Gy</sub> (5.63 ± 1.97% (B) vs. 11.83 ± 2.56% (A), p < 0.01); and right femoral head V<sub>30Gy</sub> (4.64 ± 1.94% (B) vs. 10.38 ± 2.73% (A), p < 0.01). The comparison of plan evaluation results showed the superiority of the novel multi-modality radiotherapy platform TaiChiB in dosimetric characteristics by harnessing the physical advantages of γ rays as a supplement to x rays in radiotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":48490,"journal":{"name":"Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-025-01544-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present research aims to explore the dosimetric advantages associated with a novel multi-modality radiotherapy platform TaiChiB, which integrates a medical linac and a focused 60Co γ-ray system. The primary focus of this investigation is to assess the efficacy of this platform in the treatment of prostate cancer. A retrospective study was conducted involving fifteen prostate patients. Each patient had two different treatment plans: a Varian linac x-ray plan (group A), and a TaiChiB plan combined with linac x rays and focused γ rays (group B). In both plan groups, the prescribed dose to the planning target volume (PTV) was 50 Gy, with a boost dose of 20 Gy to the gross tumor volume (GTV). In the TaiChiB plan, the primary plan was delivered using linac x rays and the boost dose plan was delivered using γ rays. Different criteria were used to evaluate the plan quality and results from the two plan groups were compared through statistical analysis (p < 0.05 as significantly different). All plans from these two groups met the clinical requirements for treatment, and Gamma passing rates were above 95% using the 3%/2 mm criterion suggested by TG-218. Regarding the dose coverage to targets, the TaiChiB plan group had a higher mean dose to the GTV (77.46 ± 1.04 Gy (B) vs. 71.40 ± 0.33 Gy (A), p < 0.01), whereas it maintained a comparable mean dose to the PTV (55.33 ± 1.76 Gy (B) vs. 55.23 ± 1.92 Gy (A), non-significant). In terms of dose to organs-at-risk (OARs), the TaiChiB plan group showed a lower or comparable mean value. In detail, bladder V45Gy (43.90 ± 6.34% (B) vs. 49.83 ± 6.31% (A), p < 0.01); rectum V45Gy (38.45 ± 14.38% (B) vs. 51.46 ± 17.18%(A), p < 0.01); intestine V45Gy (163.88 ± 18.85 cm3 (B) vs. 177.18 ± 18.20 cm3 (A), p < 0.01); left femoral head V30Gy (5.63 ± 1.97% (B) vs. 11.83 ± 2.56% (A), p < 0.01); and right femoral head V30Gy (4.64 ± 1.94% (B) vs. 10.38 ± 2.73% (A), p < 0.01). The comparison of plan evaluation results showed the superiority of the novel multi-modality radiotherapy platform TaiChiB in dosimetric characteristics by harnessing the physical advantages of γ rays as a supplement to x rays in radiotherapy.

探讨一种新型多模态前列腺癌放射治疗平台的剂量学优势。
本研究旨在探索新型多模态放射治疗平台TaiChiB的剂量学优势,该平台集成了医疗直线加速器和聚焦60Co γ射线系统。本研究的主要重点是评估该平台治疗前列腺癌的疗效。我们对15名前列腺患者进行了回顾性研究。每位患者有两种不同的治疗方案:瓦里安直线x射线计划(a组)和TaiChiB计划结合直线x射线和聚焦γ射线(B组)。在两个计划组中,计划靶体积(PTV)的规定剂量为50 Gy,总肿瘤体积(GTV)的增强剂量为20 Gy。在TaiChiB计划中,初级计划使用直线x射线,增强剂量计划使用γ射线。采用不同标准评价方案质量,并对两组方案结果进行统计学比较(p 45Gy(43.90±6.34%)vs. 49.83±6.31% (A), p 45Gy(38.45±14.38%)vs. 51.46±17.18%(A), p 45Gy(163.88±18.85 cm3 (B) vs. 177.18±18.20 cm3 (A), p 30Gy(5.63±1.97% (B) vs. 11.83±2.56% (A), p 30Gy(4.64±1.94% (B) vs. 10.38±2.73% (A), p 30Gy(4.64±1.94%)vs. 10.38±2.73% (A))
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
110
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信