[Specialty-specific knowledge as prerequisite for effective treatment of critically ill patients].

Sonja Vonderhagen, Uwe Hamsen, Andreas Markewitz, Ingo Marzi, Gerrit Matthes, Andreas Seekamp, Georg Trummer, Felix Walcher, Christian Waydhas, René Wildenauer, Jens Werner, Wolfgang H Hartl, Thomas Schmitz-Rixen
{"title":"[Specialty-specific knowledge as prerequisite for effective treatment of critically ill patients].","authors":"Sonja Vonderhagen, Uwe Hamsen, Andreas Markewitz, Ingo Marzi, Gerrit Matthes, Andreas Seekamp, Georg Trummer, Felix Walcher, Christian Waydhas, René Wildenauer, Jens Werner, Wolfgang H Hartl, Thomas Schmitz-Rixen","doi":"10.1007/s00104-025-02286-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since the last meeting of the German Medical Association in May 2024, there has been a discussion in Germany about the shortening of primary specialty training and a transfer of the contents of additional supra-specialty training to the existing primary specialty training. This also affects intensive care medicine, with the prospect of creating a subspecialty for subspecialties in intensive care medicine (e.g., a specialty in surgical intensive care medicine). We consider the associated reduction of general specialty-specific contents to be inappropriate for several reasons. Knowledge of the specialty-specific trigger factors (foci) of a critical illness (organ dysfunction) as well as knowledge of the respective trigger factor-specific symptoms, diagnostics and pathways for initiating a causal treatment, are decisive for the prognosis. Recent evidence suggests that in the case of septic foci a time span between making the diagnosis and treatment of the focus should not exceed ca. 6h in order to avoid a worsening of the prognosis. To ensure that the time between symptom onset and effective treatment of the causal factors is not too long, an in-depth expertise in the primary specialty is required throughout the process. This expertise is independent of training in intensive care medicine and can only be acquired through adequate training in the specialty, followed by additional training in intensive care medicine. Expertise in the primary specialty is a prerequisite for the effective treatment of critically ill patients. Maintaining the training specific to the primary specialty and the associated acquisition of specific knowledge in the respective specialty also enables a wider deployment of specialists in clinical practice and a more economical use of diagnostic and therapeutic resources. The additional training in intensive care medicine (supraspecialty) should not be at the expense of content specific to the primary specialty and must remain accessible to all surgical specialties in the field of surgery in the next revision of the training regulations. Due to the unavoidable extent, the additional training in intensive care medicine can itself only be provided on a full-time basis.</p>","PeriodicalId":72588,"journal":{"name":"Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-025-02286-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the last meeting of the German Medical Association in May 2024, there has been a discussion in Germany about the shortening of primary specialty training and a transfer of the contents of additional supra-specialty training to the existing primary specialty training. This also affects intensive care medicine, with the prospect of creating a subspecialty for subspecialties in intensive care medicine (e.g., a specialty in surgical intensive care medicine). We consider the associated reduction of general specialty-specific contents to be inappropriate for several reasons. Knowledge of the specialty-specific trigger factors (foci) of a critical illness (organ dysfunction) as well as knowledge of the respective trigger factor-specific symptoms, diagnostics and pathways for initiating a causal treatment, are decisive for the prognosis. Recent evidence suggests that in the case of septic foci a time span between making the diagnosis and treatment of the focus should not exceed ca. 6h in order to avoid a worsening of the prognosis. To ensure that the time between symptom onset and effective treatment of the causal factors is not too long, an in-depth expertise in the primary specialty is required throughout the process. This expertise is independent of training in intensive care medicine and can only be acquired through adequate training in the specialty, followed by additional training in intensive care medicine. Expertise in the primary specialty is a prerequisite for the effective treatment of critically ill patients. Maintaining the training specific to the primary specialty and the associated acquisition of specific knowledge in the respective specialty also enables a wider deployment of specialists in clinical practice and a more economical use of diagnostic and therapeutic resources. The additional training in intensive care medicine (supraspecialty) should not be at the expense of content specific to the primary specialty and must remain accessible to all surgical specialties in the field of surgery in the next revision of the training regulations. Due to the unavoidable extent, the additional training in intensive care medicine can itself only be provided on a full-time basis.

【专业知识是有效救治危重患者的前提】。
自德国医学协会于2024年5月举行上次会议以来,德国一直在讨论缩短初级专业培训和将额外的超专业培训内容转移到现有的初级专业培训的问题。这也影响了重症监护医学,有可能为重症监护医学的亚专科创建一个亚专科(例如,外科重症监护医学的专科)。我们认为相关的一般专业特定内容的减少是不合适的,有几个原因。了解危重疾病(器官功能障碍)的特殊触发因素(foci)以及各自的触发因素特异性症状、诊断和启动因果治疗途径的知识,对预后具有决定性作用。最近的证据表明,在脓毒性病灶的情况下,诊断和治疗之间的时间跨度不应超过约6小时,以避免预后恶化。为了确保症状出现和病因有效治疗之间的时间不会太长,在整个过程中都需要在初级专业方面有深入的专业知识。这种专业知识是独立于重症监护医学培训的,只能通过充分的专业培训,然后再进行重症监护医学的额外培训来获得。初级专科的专业知识是有效治疗危重病人的先决条件。保持针对主要专业的培训和相关专业知识的获取,还可以在临床实践中更广泛地部署专家,并更经济地使用诊断和治疗资源。重症监护医学(超专科)的额外培训不应以牺牲主要专科的特定内容为代价,并且必须在下次培训条例修订中保留对外科领域所有外科专科的可访问性。由于不可避免的程度,重症监护医学的额外培训本身只能在全日制的基础上提供。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信