Why combine and why neoadjuvant? Tumor immunological perspectives on chemoimmunotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer.

Abstract

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive subtype characterized by limited targeted therapies and high recurrence rates. While immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown promise, their efficacy as monotherapy is limited. Clinically, ICIs demonstrate significant benefit primarily when combined with chemotherapy, particularly in the neoadjuvant setting for early-stage TNBC, which yields superior outcomes compared to adjuvant therapy. This review elucidates the tumor immunological principles underlying these observations. We discussed how the suppressive tumor microenvironment (TME), progressive T cell exhaustion, and associated epigenetic scarring constrain ICI monotherapy effectiveness. Crucially, we highlight the immunological advantages of the neoadjuvant approach: the presence of the primary tumor provides abundant antigens, and intact tumor-draining lymph nodes (TDLNs) act as critical sites for ICI-mediated priming and expansion of naïve and precursor exhausted T cells. This robust activation within TDLNs enhances systemic anti-tumor immunity and expands the T cell repertoire, a process less effectively achieved in the adjuvant setting after tumor resection. These mechanisms provide a strong rationale for the improved pathological complete response (pCR) rates and event-free survival observed with neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy, as demonstrated in trials like KEYNOTE-522. We further explore the implications for adjuvant therapy decisions based on treatment response, the challenges of ICI resistance, the need for predictive biomarkers, management of immune-related adverse events (irAEs), and future therapeutic directions. Understanding the dynamic interplay between chemotherapy, ICIs, T cells, and the TME, particularly the role of TDLNs in the neoadjuvant context, is essential for optimizing immunotherapy strategies and improving outcomes for patients with TNBC.