Transfer of a telemedicine intervention for mental disorders: a comparison between RCT results and regional routine care.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Aletta Boerkoel, Ulrike Stentzel, Hans Jörgen Grabe, Deborah Janowitz, Wolfgang Hoffmann, Neeltje van den Berg
{"title":"Transfer of a telemedicine intervention for mental disorders: a comparison between RCT results and regional routine care.","authors":"Aletta Boerkoel, Ulrike Stentzel, Hans Jörgen Grabe, Deborah Janowitz, Wolfgang Hoffmann, Neeltje van den Berg","doi":"10.1055/a-2508-8861","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Telemedicine for the treatment of depression and anxiety disorders was found to be successful in a randomised controlled trial (RCT); this intervention was then implemented in routine care in the Western Pomerania region in Germany. This made it possible to investigate the effectiveness of the intervention under routine care conditions and compare it with the results of the RCT.For this retrospective controlled analysis, data from routine care (2011-2022) were analysed together with data from the previous RCT (2009-2010). A three-arm comparison (routine care, previous RCT intervention group, previous RCT control group) on the primary outcome of symptom severity (BSI-18) and a longitudinal analysis of the routine care data were conducted. The telemedical intervention was conducted in the university hospital's psychiatric outpatient clinic in north-eastern Germany. All adult patients with an ICD-10 diagnosis of depression, anxiety or somatoform disorders could participate after discharge from the hospital. The telemedicine sessions included structured verbal questionnaires and conversational therapy concerning treatment goals and tasks. Repeated measures Welch ANOVA with the BSI-18 Global Severity Index and subscales (depression, anxiety and somatisation) was performed. A multivariate regression was conducted on the longitudinal regular care data.The n=254 subjects in the telemedical care in routine care arm (181 women, mean [95%CI] age 45.5 [44.0-47.1] years; 6-month follow-up) showed a BSI-18 score improvement M=- 4.1 [-5.3,-2.9], F(2)=3.50, p<0.05 compared to the preceding RCT intervention arms (61 women, mean [95%CI] age 44.7 [41.7-47.6] years. Telemedical care showed a significant difference in BSI-18 scores over a 10-year follow-up: M=- 3.9 [-5.4,-2.5], p<0.0001.The positive results of the 2009 RCT were replicable in routine care. The more patient-centred approach resulted in improved outcomes in this telemedical intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":47653,"journal":{"name":"Gesundheitswesen","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gesundheitswesen","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2508-8861","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Telemedicine for the treatment of depression and anxiety disorders was found to be successful in a randomised controlled trial (RCT); this intervention was then implemented in routine care in the Western Pomerania region in Germany. This made it possible to investigate the effectiveness of the intervention under routine care conditions and compare it with the results of the RCT.For this retrospective controlled analysis, data from routine care (2011-2022) were analysed together with data from the previous RCT (2009-2010). A three-arm comparison (routine care, previous RCT intervention group, previous RCT control group) on the primary outcome of symptom severity (BSI-18) and a longitudinal analysis of the routine care data were conducted. The telemedical intervention was conducted in the university hospital's psychiatric outpatient clinic in north-eastern Germany. All adult patients with an ICD-10 diagnosis of depression, anxiety or somatoform disorders could participate after discharge from the hospital. The telemedicine sessions included structured verbal questionnaires and conversational therapy concerning treatment goals and tasks. Repeated measures Welch ANOVA with the BSI-18 Global Severity Index and subscales (depression, anxiety and somatisation) was performed. A multivariate regression was conducted on the longitudinal regular care data.The n=254 subjects in the telemedical care in routine care arm (181 women, mean [95%CI] age 45.5 [44.0-47.1] years; 6-month follow-up) showed a BSI-18 score improvement M=- 4.1 [-5.3,-2.9], F(2)=3.50, p<0.05 compared to the preceding RCT intervention arms (61 women, mean [95%CI] age 44.7 [41.7-47.6] years. Telemedical care showed a significant difference in BSI-18 scores over a 10-year follow-up: M=- 3.9 [-5.4,-2.5], p<0.0001.The positive results of the 2009 RCT were replicable in routine care. The more patient-centred approach resulted in improved outcomes in this telemedical intervention.

精神障碍远程医疗干预的转移:RCT结果与区域常规护理的比较。
在一项随机对照试验(RCT)中发现,远程医疗治疗抑郁症和焦虑症是成功的;这一干预措施随后在德国西波美拉尼亚地区的常规护理中实施。这使得在常规护理条件下调查干预的有效性成为可能,并将其与随机对照试验的结果进行比较。在这项回顾性对照分析中,常规护理(2011-2022年)的数据与之前的随机对照试验(2009-2010年)的数据一起进行了分析。对三组(常规护理组、既往RCT干预组、既往RCT对照组)患者症状严重程度主要结局指标(BSI-18)进行三组比较,并对常规护理资料进行纵向分析。远程医疗干预是在德国东北部大学医院的精神病门诊进行的。所有被ICD-10诊断为抑郁、焦虑或躯体形式障碍的成年患者在出院后都可以参加。远程医疗会议包括结构化的口头问卷调查和关于治疗目标和任务的会话治疗。使用BSI-18全球严重程度指数和子量表(抑郁、焦虑和躯体化)进行重复测量Welch方差分析。对纵向常规护理资料进行多元回归分析。常规护理组远程医疗护理254例(女性181例,平均[95%CI]年龄45.5[44.0 ~ 47.1]岁;随访6个月)BSI-18评分改善M=- 4.1 [-5.3,-2.9], F(2)=3.50, p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gesundheitswesen
Gesundheitswesen PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
18.20%
发文量
308
期刊介绍: The health service informs you comprehensively and up-to-date about the most important topics of the health care system. In addition to guidelines, overviews and comments, you will find current research results and contributions to CME-certified continuing education and training. The journal offers a scientific discussion forum and a platform for communications from professional societies. The content quality is ensured by a publisher body, the expert advisory board and other experts in the peer review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信