The Heterogeneity of Pulmonary Hypertension Nomenclature in Empiric Research Studies: Systematic Findings From Three Western European Countries.

IF 2.2 4区医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS

Pulmonary Circulation Pub Date : 2025-04-28 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1002/pul2.70089

Armella Santi, Veranyuy Ngah, Eric W Robbins, Bradley A Maron, Katarina Zeder

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This systematic literature review of three Western European Countries identified N = 48 different terms to describe pulmonary arterial pressure and N = 35 thresholds used to define pulmonary hypertension in published empiric research studies. There is an urgent need to standardize pulmonary artery pressure nomenclature and pulmonary hypertension definitions in clinical research reports.

查看原文本刊更多论文

实证研究中肺动脉高压命名的异质性：来自三个西欧国家的系统发现。

本文对三个西欧国家进行了系统的文献综述，确定了N = 48个描述肺动脉压的不同术语和N = 35个在已发表的实证研究中用于定义肺动脉高压的阈值。在临床研究报告中，迫切需要规范肺动脉压的命名和肺动脉高压的定义。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Pulmonary Circulation Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

CiteScore

4.20

自引率

11.50%

发文量

153

审稿时长

15 weeks

期刊介绍： Pulmonary Circulation''s main goal is to encourage basic, translational, and clinical research by investigators, physician-scientists, and clinicans, in the hope of increasing survival rates for pulmonary hypertension and other pulmonary vascular diseases worldwide, and developing new therapeutic approaches for the diseases. Freely available online, Pulmonary Circulation allows diverse knowledge of research, techniques, and case studies to reach a wide readership of specialists in order to improve patient care and treatment outcomes.