Combining frequency navigator and optical prospective motion correction for functional MRS during motor activation at 3 T: A feasibility study

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Medical physics Pub Date : 2025-05-02 DOI:10.1002/mp.17861
Yiling Liu, Yu Wei, Yanxing Yang, Xinyue Zhang, Jiaqi Zhao, Philip Kenneth Lee, Assaf Tal, Hao Chen, Zhiyong Zhang
{"title":"Combining frequency navigator and optical prospective motion correction for functional MRS during motor activation at 3 T: A feasibility study","authors":"Yiling Liu,&nbsp;Yu Wei,&nbsp;Yanxing Yang,&nbsp;Xinyue Zhang,&nbsp;Jiaqi Zhao,&nbsp;Philip Kenneth Lee,&nbsp;Assaf Tal,&nbsp;Hao Chen,&nbsp;Zhiyong Zhang","doi":"10.1002/mp.17861","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Functional magnetic resonance spectroscopy (fMRS) is a powerful tool for investigating neurometabolic dynamics in response to physiological stimuli in vivo. However, fMRS is challenging due to the low SNR of the spectrum and small neurochemical changes. Many existing studies were conducted at ultrahigh field strength (7 T). To translate fMRS studies to the more common 3 T clinical field strength, averaging more transients can improve SNR. However, this results in a long scan time compounds physiological motion which incurs degradations in spectrum quality and consistency.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>Investigate the feasibility of PRESS fMRS studies at 3 T assisted by the combination of prospective motion correction (PMC) system and frequency navigator.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A combination of markerless PMC system and frequency navigator was applied to an fMRS study during motor activation with a clinical PRESS protocol at 3 T. Twenty-one volunteers were involved in the study. The functional task paradigm consisted of three blocks REST-TASK-REST. During the TASK period, the volunteer was asked to squeeze a hand-hold balloon according to a red rectangle flashing at 2 Hz shown centered in a black background. The same motor task was repeated twice, once with PMC ON and once with PMC OFF. The data were processed and quantified by in-house VDI software. The following two analyses were performed: a motion pattern analysis and a metabolite dynamics analysis. The motion analysis was used to compare the motion states when PMC was ON and OFF. The metabolite dynamic change was a key assessment for the fMRS study. It was estimated via <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>Δ</mi>\n <mo>=</mo>\n <mfrac>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>μ</mi>\n <mrow>\n <mi>t</mi>\n <mi>a</mi>\n <mi>s</mi>\n <mi>k</mi>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n <mo>−</mo>\n <msub>\n <mi>μ</mi>\n <mrow>\n <mi>r</mi>\n <mi>e</mi>\n <mi>s</mi>\n <mi>t</mi>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>μ</mi>\n <mrow>\n <mi>r</mi>\n <mi>e</mi>\n <mi>s</mi>\n <mi>t</mi>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n </mfrac>\n <mspace></mspace>\n <mo>≡</mo>\n <mfrac>\n <mrow>\n <mi>Δ</mi>\n <mi>μ</mi>\n </mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>μ</mi>\n <mrow>\n <mi>r</mi>\n <mi>e</mi>\n <mi>s</mi>\n <mi>t</mi>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n </mfrac>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>${{\\Delta}} = \\frac{{{\\mu }_{task} - {\\mu }_{rest}}}{{{\\mu }_{rest}}}\\ \\equiv \\frac{{\\Delta \\mu }}{{{\\mu }_{rest}}}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>. <i>p</i>-values &lt; 0.05 were considered significant.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A statistically significant increase in Glx of 5.73% when the PMC was switched on was observed. No statistically significant increase in any of the metabolites with PMC OFF was observed. The major singlets (tCho, tCr, and tNAA) for both PMC ON and OFF keep constant.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>With a markerless PMC system and frequency navigator, PRESS fMRS at 3 T is capable of detecting small changes of a few percent in Glx concentration during functional activation.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18384,"journal":{"name":"Medical physics","volume":"52 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mp.17861","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Functional magnetic resonance spectroscopy (fMRS) is a powerful tool for investigating neurometabolic dynamics in response to physiological stimuli in vivo. However, fMRS is challenging due to the low SNR of the spectrum and small neurochemical changes. Many existing studies were conducted at ultrahigh field strength (7 T). To translate fMRS studies to the more common 3 T clinical field strength, averaging more transients can improve SNR. However, this results in a long scan time compounds physiological motion which incurs degradations in spectrum quality and consistency.

Purpose

Investigate the feasibility of PRESS fMRS studies at 3 T assisted by the combination of prospective motion correction (PMC) system and frequency navigator.

Methods

A combination of markerless PMC system and frequency navigator was applied to an fMRS study during motor activation with a clinical PRESS protocol at 3 T. Twenty-one volunteers were involved in the study. The functional task paradigm consisted of three blocks REST-TASK-REST. During the TASK period, the volunteer was asked to squeeze a hand-hold balloon according to a red rectangle flashing at 2 Hz shown centered in a black background. The same motor task was repeated twice, once with PMC ON and once with PMC OFF. The data were processed and quantified by in-house VDI software. The following two analyses were performed: a motion pattern analysis and a metabolite dynamics analysis. The motion analysis was used to compare the motion states when PMC was ON and OFF. The metabolite dynamic change was a key assessment for the fMRS study. It was estimated via Δ = μ t a s k μ r e s t μ r e s t Δ μ μ r e s t ${{\Delta}} = \frac{{{\mu }_{task} - {\mu }_{rest}}}{{{\mu }_{rest}}}\ \equiv \frac{{\Delta \mu }}{{{\mu }_{rest}}}$ . p-values < 0.05 were considered significant.

Results

A statistically significant increase in Glx of 5.73% when the PMC was switched on was observed. No statistically significant increase in any of the metabolites with PMC OFF was observed. The major singlets (tCho, tCr, and tNAA) for both PMC ON and OFF keep constant.

Conclusions

With a markerless PMC system and frequency navigator, PRESS fMRS at 3 T is capable of detecting small changes of a few percent in Glx concentration during functional activation.

结合频率导航和光学前瞻性运动校正功能MRS在3 T运动激活:可行性研究。
背景:功能磁共振波谱(fMRS)是研究体内对生理刺激反应的神经代谢动力学的有力工具。然而,由于频谱的低信噪比和小的神经化学变化,fMRS具有挑战性。现有的许多研究都是在超高场强(7t)下进行的。为了将fMRS研究转化为更常见的3t临床场强,平均更多的瞬态可以提高信噪比。然而,这会导致扫描时间过长和生理运动,从而导致频谱质量和一致性的下降。目的:探讨前瞻性运动校正(PMC)系统与频率导航仪联合辅助下3 T时PRESS fMRS研究的可行性。方法:采用无标记PMC系统和频率导航仪相结合的方法,在3 t的临床PRESS方案下进行运动激活时的fMRS研究。功能任务范式由三个块REST-TASK-REST组成。在任务期间,志愿者被要求根据黑色背景中以2赫兹闪烁的红色矩形挤压一个手持气球。同样的运动任务重复两次,一次PMC打开,一次PMC关闭。通过内部VDI软件对数据进行处理和量化。进行了以下两项分析:运动模式分析和代谢物动力学分析。通过运动分析比较PMC开、关时的运动状态。代谢产物的动态变化是fMRS研究的关键评估指标。通过Δ = μ t as k - μ r est μ r est≡Δ μ r est ${{\Delta}} = \frac{{{\mu }_{task} - {\mu }_{rest}}}{{{\mu }_{rest}}}\ \equiv \frac{{\Delta \mu }}{{{\mu }_{rest}}}$估算。p值< 0.05为显著性。结果:Glx升高5.73,有统计学意义% when the PMC was switched on was observed. No statistically significant increase in any of the metabolites with PMC OFF was observed. The major singlets (tCho, tCr, and tNAA) for both PMC ON and OFF keep constant.Conclusions: With a markerless PMC system and frequency navigator, PRESS fMRS at 3 T is capable of detecting small changes of a few percent in Glx concentration during functional activation.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical physics
Medical physics 医学-核医学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
15.80%
发文量
660
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Medical Physics publishes original, high impact physics, imaging science, and engineering research that advances patient diagnosis and therapy through contributions in 1) Basic science developments with high potential for clinical translation 2) Clinical applications of cutting edge engineering and physics innovations 3) Broadly applicable and innovative clinical physics developments Medical Physics is a journal of global scope and reach. By publishing in Medical Physics your research will reach an international, multidisciplinary audience including practicing medical physicists as well as physics- and engineering based translational scientists. We work closely with authors of promising articles to improve their quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信