[Lung Volume Reduction Surgery - an Alternative or a Bridge to Transplantation].

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY
Zentralblatt fur Chirurgie Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-24 DOI:10.1055/a-2576-6651
Alexis Slama, Clemens Aigner
{"title":"[Lung Volume Reduction Surgery - an Alternative or a Bridge to Transplantation].","authors":"Alexis Slama, Clemens Aigner","doi":"10.1055/a-2576-6651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) and lung transplantation (LuTX) are established therapeutic options for patients with advanced pulmonary emphysema. This review analyses both procedures with respect to indications, surgical techniques, outcomes, and complications. Special attention is given to the controversial sequential application as a bridge to transplantation. Evidence shows that both procedures can significantly improve lung function, quality of life, and survival when patients are carefully selected. Despite some overlap in indication criteria, most patients qualify for only one of the procedures as based on their specific clinical constellation. Recent research has challenged traditional contraindications such as pulmonary hypertension or homogeneous emphysema, and consequently, the indication spectrum for LVRS has been expanded. Contrary to earlier assumptions, current multicentre studies demonstrate that prior LVRS has no negative impact on subsequent transplantation outcomes, provided minimally invasive surgical techniques and modern perioperative management are employed. LVRS can delay the need for transplantation, which is a significant advantage given the shortage of donor organs. The key to success lies in interdisciplinary evaluation and personalized treatment planning. Both procedures should be understood as complementary rather than competing options. Future research should focus on predictive biomarkers, optimal timing, and combined patient-centred endpoints.</p>","PeriodicalId":23956,"journal":{"name":"Zentralblatt fur Chirurgie","volume":" ","pages":"261-272"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zentralblatt fur Chirurgie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2576-6651","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) and lung transplantation (LuTX) are established therapeutic options for patients with advanced pulmonary emphysema. This review analyses both procedures with respect to indications, surgical techniques, outcomes, and complications. Special attention is given to the controversial sequential application as a bridge to transplantation. Evidence shows that both procedures can significantly improve lung function, quality of life, and survival when patients are carefully selected. Despite some overlap in indication criteria, most patients qualify for only one of the procedures as based on their specific clinical constellation. Recent research has challenged traditional contraindications such as pulmonary hypertension or homogeneous emphysema, and consequently, the indication spectrum for LVRS has been expanded. Contrary to earlier assumptions, current multicentre studies demonstrate that prior LVRS has no negative impact on subsequent transplantation outcomes, provided minimally invasive surgical techniques and modern perioperative management are employed. LVRS can delay the need for transplantation, which is a significant advantage given the shortage of donor organs. The key to success lies in interdisciplinary evaluation and personalized treatment planning. Both procedures should be understood as complementary rather than competing options. Future research should focus on predictive biomarkers, optimal timing, and combined patient-centred endpoints.

[肺减容手术-移植的替代或桥梁]。
肺减容手术(LVRS)和肺移植(LuTX)是晚期肺气肿患者公认的治疗选择。这篇综述分析了这两种手术的适应症、手术技术、结果和并发症。特别注意的是有争议的顺序应用作为移植的桥梁。有证据表明,这两种方法都能显著改善肺功能,改善患者的生活质量和生存率。尽管在适应症标准上有一些重叠,但大多数患者根据其特定的临床星座只符合其中一种手术的条件。最近的研究挑战了传统的禁忌症,如肺动脉高压或均质性肺气肿,因此,LVRS的适应症范围已经扩大。与先前的假设相反,目前的多中心研究表明,如果采用微创手术技术和现代围手术期管理,先前的LVRS对随后的移植结果没有负面影响。LVRS可以推迟移植的需要,这是一个显著的优势,因为供体器官短缺。成功的关键在于跨学科的评估和个性化的治疗计划。这两种程序应被理解为相互补充而不是相互竞争的选择。未来的研究应侧重于预测性生物标志物、最佳时机和以患者为中心的联合终点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
14.30%
发文量
116
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Konzentriertes Fachwissen aus Forschung und Praxis Das Zentralblatt für Chirurgie – alle Neuigkeiten aus der Allgemeinen, Viszeral-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信