Cecilia Hurtado, James D Harrison, Susan L Ivey, Mark D Fleming, Michael B Potter, Gena Lewis, Stutee Khandelwal, Tung Nguyen, David Ofman, Lali Moheno, Maria Carbajal, Maria Echaveste, Kerrington Osborne, Gary Bossier, Nynikka R Palmer
{"title":"Community Health Centers' Response to COVID-19 and Serving the Community: This Feeling of Never Being Enough and Never Doing Enough.","authors":"Cecilia Hurtado, James D Harrison, Susan L Ivey, Mark D Fleming, Michael B Potter, Gena Lewis, Stutee Khandelwal, Tung Nguyen, David Ofman, Lali Moheno, Maria Carbajal, Maria Echaveste, Kerrington Osborne, Gary Bossier, Nynikka R Palmer","doi":"10.1097/JAC.0000000000000530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Community health centers (CHCs) are a vital safety net for under-resourced and medically underserved patients. As few studies have explored how they implemented broad-based organizational changes throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, we aimed to qualitatively examine CHCs' longitudinal, comprehensive pandemic response through the perspectives of staff, administrators, and researchers working in CHCs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>25 clinic leaders, staff, and researchers from three CHC networks and two academic medical centers in Northern California and the Central Valley of California participated in 18 focus groups and interviews between April and October 2022. We used thematic content analysis to identify key themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Key themes emerged for three pandemic phases: shutdown, pivot, and recovery. During the shutdown, CHCs paused non-urgent services and in-person outreach while facing increased strain on staff capacity. Although CHCs were traditionally siloed, the pivot phase yielded efforts to build trust through information dissemination, partnerships with other health care organizations, and unprecedented innovations in care delivery. During recovery, CHCs re-prioritized preventive care but continued to face poor access to specialty care and socioeconomic resources for their patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic magnified extant barriers within CHCs, including limitations in funding, staff capacity, and infrastructure for collaboration. CHC constituents highlight lessons learned through organization-wide adaptations and opportunities for the continuation and expansion of pandemic-related changes (e.g., investments in CHCs' workforce, care delivery infrastructure, and avenues for multidisciplinary collaboration) to better serve their communities in the post-COVID era.</p>","PeriodicalId":46654,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF AMBULATORY CARE MANAGEMENT","volume":" ","pages":"136-146"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF AMBULATORY CARE MANAGEMENT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JAC.0000000000000530","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Community health centers (CHCs) are a vital safety net for under-resourced and medically underserved patients. As few studies have explored how they implemented broad-based organizational changes throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, we aimed to qualitatively examine CHCs' longitudinal, comprehensive pandemic response through the perspectives of staff, administrators, and researchers working in CHCs.
Methods: 25 clinic leaders, staff, and researchers from three CHC networks and two academic medical centers in Northern California and the Central Valley of California participated in 18 focus groups and interviews between April and October 2022. We used thematic content analysis to identify key themes.
Results: Key themes emerged for three pandemic phases: shutdown, pivot, and recovery. During the shutdown, CHCs paused non-urgent services and in-person outreach while facing increased strain on staff capacity. Although CHCs were traditionally siloed, the pivot phase yielded efforts to build trust through information dissemination, partnerships with other health care organizations, and unprecedented innovations in care delivery. During recovery, CHCs re-prioritized preventive care but continued to face poor access to specialty care and socioeconomic resources for their patients.
Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic magnified extant barriers within CHCs, including limitations in funding, staff capacity, and infrastructure for collaboration. CHC constituents highlight lessons learned through organization-wide adaptations and opportunities for the continuation and expansion of pandemic-related changes (e.g., investments in CHCs' workforce, care delivery infrastructure, and avenues for multidisciplinary collaboration) to better serve their communities in the post-COVID era.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Ambulatory Care Management is a PEER-REVIEWED journal that provides timely, applied information on the most important developments and issues in ambulatory care management.