Thoracic aortic calcification as a predictor of coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.7 Q3 PATHOLOGY
Hussein Nafakhi, Alaa Salah Jumaah, Akeel Abed Yasseen
{"title":"Thoracic aortic calcification as a predictor of coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Hussein Nafakhi, Alaa Salah Jumaah, Akeel Abed Yasseen","doi":"10.4132/jptm.2025.03.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The relationship between coronary atherosclerosis (progression, outcome) and calcification in the thoracic aorta (TAC), particularly across its various segments, is complex and often shows conflicting associations in the literature. To address this debated and complex relationship, we aimed to evaluate how TAC and its segments correlate with the presence and severity of coronary artery disease (CAD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed all articles published between January 1990 and September 2024 that examined the link between TAC and CAD and were indexed in PubMed, Scopus, or EMBASE. Using a random-effects model, we calculated pooled proportions, odds ratios, and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to evaluate the association between TAC and CAD, with consideration of severity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 17 studies with 8,187 participants, 2,775 of whom had CAD (1,059 with severe CAD), and 5,412 of whom did not. The pooled odds ratio of TAC in patients with CAD compared to that in those without was 3.874 (95% CI, 2.789 to 5.381). For severe CAD versus mild CAD, the odds ratio was 8.005 (95% CI, 2.611 to 24.542). Calcification of the aortic root (pooled proportion, 51%; 95% CI, 0.282 to 0.733) or descending aorta (pooled proportion, 53.4%; 95% CI, 0.341 to 0.718) had the strongest association with CAD compared to calcification of the arch or ascending aorta.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TAC is significantly associated with both the presence and severity of CAD. Calcification in the descending aorta and aortic root is more strongly linked to CAD than calcification in the arch or ascending aorta.</p>","PeriodicalId":46933,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4132/jptm.2025.03.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The relationship between coronary atherosclerosis (progression, outcome) and calcification in the thoracic aorta (TAC), particularly across its various segments, is complex and often shows conflicting associations in the literature. To address this debated and complex relationship, we aimed to evaluate how TAC and its segments correlate with the presence and severity of coronary artery disease (CAD).

Methods: We reviewed all articles published between January 1990 and September 2024 that examined the link between TAC and CAD and were indexed in PubMed, Scopus, or EMBASE. Using a random-effects model, we calculated pooled proportions, odds ratios, and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to evaluate the association between TAC and CAD, with consideration of severity.

Results: The study included 17 studies with 8,187 participants, 2,775 of whom had CAD (1,059 with severe CAD), and 5,412 of whom did not. The pooled odds ratio of TAC in patients with CAD compared to that in those without was 3.874 (95% CI, 2.789 to 5.381). For severe CAD versus mild CAD, the odds ratio was 8.005 (95% CI, 2.611 to 24.542). Calcification of the aortic root (pooled proportion, 51%; 95% CI, 0.282 to 0.733) or descending aorta (pooled proportion, 53.4%; 95% CI, 0.341 to 0.718) had the strongest association with CAD compared to calcification of the arch or ascending aorta.

Conclusions: TAC is significantly associated with both the presence and severity of CAD. Calcification in the descending aorta and aortic root is more strongly linked to CAD than calcification in the arch or ascending aorta.

胸主动脉钙化作为冠状动脉疾病的预测因子:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析
背景:冠状动脉粥样硬化(进展、结局)与胸主动脉(TAC)钙化之间的关系是复杂的,在文献中经常显示出相互矛盾的关联。为了解决这个有争议的复杂关系,我们旨在评估TAC及其节段如何与冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的存在和严重程度相关。方法:我们回顾了1990年1月至2024年9月期间发表的所有研究TAC和CAD之间联系的文章,并在PubMed、Scopus或EMBASE中检索。使用随机效应模型,我们计算了合并比例、优势比和相应的95%置信区间(ci),以评估TAC和CAD之间的关联,并考虑了严重程度。结果:该研究包括17项研究,8,187名参与者,其中2,775人患有CAD(1,059人患有严重CAD), 5,412人没有。冠心病患者与非冠心病患者相比,TAC的合并优势比为3.874 (95% CI, 2.789 ~ 5.381)。对于严重CAD与轻度CAD,优势比为8.005 (95% CI, 2.611至24.542)。主动脉根部钙化(合并比例为51%;95% CI, 0.282 ~ 0.733)或降主动脉(合并比例,53.4%;95% CI(0.341 ~ 0.718)与动脉弓或升主动脉钙化的相关性最强。结论:TAC与CAD的存在和严重程度显著相关。降主动脉和主动脉根部钙化与冠心病的关系比动脉弓或升主动脉钙化更密切。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
4.20%
发文量
45
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine is an open venue for the rapid publication of major achievements in various fields of pathology, cytopathology, and biomedical and translational research. The Journal aims to share new insights into the molecular and cellular mechanisms of human diseases and to report major advances in both experimental and clinical medicine, with a particular emphasis on translational research. The investigations of human cells and tissues using high-dimensional biology techniques such as genomics and proteomics will be given a high priority. Articles on stem cell biology are also welcome. The categories of manuscript include original articles, review and perspective articles, case studies, brief case reports, and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信