Low-dose remifentanil as an adjunct analgesic is not associated with clinically important opioid-induced hyperalgesia: secondary analysis from a randomized controlled trial.

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Harsha Shanthanna, Maram A T M Khaled, Alvaro Diaz, Parsa Farsinejad, Sarah Clements
{"title":"Low-dose remifentanil as an adjunct analgesic is not associated with clinically important opioid-induced hyperalgesia: secondary analysis from a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Harsha Shanthanna, Maram A T M Khaled, Alvaro Diaz, Parsa Farsinejad, Sarah Clements","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2025-106483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Remifentanil, as the primary opioid or in high doses, is associated with opioid-induced hyperalgesia. We assessed outcomes of pain and opioid use with low-dose remifentanil as an adjunct analgesic after same-day surgeries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective cohort study was nested within a randomized controlled trial showing no difference in achieving satisfactory analgesia in the postanesthetic care unit with morphine or hydromorphone. Primary outcomes were pain scores in the postanesthetic care unit and 24 hours after surgery between patients who received remifentanil (R group) or those who received non-remifentanil opioid regimens (C group). We also evaluated pain scores in the day surgical unit, dose of long-acting opioids, and need for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. The association of remifentanil dose with outcomes was explored using linear regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients in both groups (R=276, C=126) had comparable baseline characteristics. There were no differences in maximum postanesthetic care unit pain scores or average pain scores 24 hours after surgery: mean difference 0.3 (95% CI -0.9 to 0.2) and 0.4 (95% CI -1.7 to 0.9), respectively. In the R group, the dose of long-acting opioids in postanesthetic care unit was higher: mean difference 0.97 mg (95% CI 0.2 to 1.7) intravenous morphine equivalents, p=0.01. Adjusted analyses indicated that higher doses of remifentanil (25 mcg increments) were associated with higher maximum pain scores in day surgical unit: 0.23 units (95% CI 0.05 to 0.41), p=0.01; higher average pain scores 24 hours after surgery: 0.25 units (95% CI 0.036 to 0.46), p=0.02; and higher long-acting opioid doses in postanesthetic care unit: 0.14 mg intravenous morphine equivalents (95% CI 0.02 to 0.25), p=0.02.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Opioid-induced hyperalgesia and increased opioid requirement after low-dose remifentanil use is unlikely to be clinically significant.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT02223377.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2025-106483","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Remifentanil, as the primary opioid or in high doses, is associated with opioid-induced hyperalgesia. We assessed outcomes of pain and opioid use with low-dose remifentanil as an adjunct analgesic after same-day surgeries.

Methods: This prospective cohort study was nested within a randomized controlled trial showing no difference in achieving satisfactory analgesia in the postanesthetic care unit with morphine or hydromorphone. Primary outcomes were pain scores in the postanesthetic care unit and 24 hours after surgery between patients who received remifentanil (R group) or those who received non-remifentanil opioid regimens (C group). We also evaluated pain scores in the day surgical unit, dose of long-acting opioids, and need for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. The association of remifentanil dose with outcomes was explored using linear regression.

Results: Patients in both groups (R=276, C=126) had comparable baseline characteristics. There were no differences in maximum postanesthetic care unit pain scores or average pain scores 24 hours after surgery: mean difference 0.3 (95% CI -0.9 to 0.2) and 0.4 (95% CI -1.7 to 0.9), respectively. In the R group, the dose of long-acting opioids in postanesthetic care unit was higher: mean difference 0.97 mg (95% CI 0.2 to 1.7) intravenous morphine equivalents, p=0.01. Adjusted analyses indicated that higher doses of remifentanil (25 mcg increments) were associated with higher maximum pain scores in day surgical unit: 0.23 units (95% CI 0.05 to 0.41), p=0.01; higher average pain scores 24 hours after surgery: 0.25 units (95% CI 0.036 to 0.46), p=0.02; and higher long-acting opioid doses in postanesthetic care unit: 0.14 mg intravenous morphine equivalents (95% CI 0.02 to 0.25), p=0.02.

Conclusion: Opioid-induced hyperalgesia and increased opioid requirement after low-dose remifentanil use is unlikely to be clinically significant.

Trial registration number: NCT02223377.

低剂量瑞芬太尼作为辅助镇痛药与临床上重要的阿片类药物引起的痛觉过敏无关:一项随机对照试验的二次分析
背景:瑞芬太尼作为主要的阿片类药物或大剂量时,与阿片类药物引起的痛觉过敏有关。我们评估了当日手术后使用低剂量瑞芬太尼作为辅助止痛药的疼痛和阿片类药物的结局。方法:这项前瞻性队列研究嵌套在一项随机对照试验中,显示吗啡或氢吗啡酮在麻醉后护理单位获得满意的镇痛效果方面没有差异。主要结局是接受瑞芬太尼(R组)或接受非瑞芬太尼阿片类药物治疗(C组)的患者在麻醉后护理单元和术后24小时的疼痛评分。我们还评估了日间手术单元的疼痛评分、长效阿片类药物的剂量以及非甾体类抗炎药的需求。采用线性回归探讨瑞芬太尼剂量与预后的关系。结果:两组患者(R=276, C=126)具有可比的基线特征。术后24小时最大麻醉后护理单元疼痛评分和平均疼痛评分无差异:平均差异分别为0.3 (95% CI -0.9 ~ 0.2)和0.4 (95% CI -1.7 ~ 0.9)。R组麻醉后护理病房长效阿片类药物的剂量更高:静脉注射吗啡当量的平均差异为0.97 mg (95% CI 0.2 ~ 1.7), p=0.01。校正分析表明,较高剂量的瑞芬太尼(25微克/次)与较高的日间手术单位最大疼痛评分相关:0.23个单位(95% CI 0.05 ~ 0.41), p=0.01;术后24小时平均疼痛评分较高:0.25个单位(95% CI 0.036 ~ 0.46), p=0.02;麻醉后护理病房的长效阿片类药物剂量更高:0.14 mg静脉注射吗啡当量(95% CI 0.02 ~ 0.25), p=0.02。结论:使用小剂量瑞芬太尼后阿片类药物引起的痛觉过敏和阿片类药物需求增加不太可能具有临床意义。试验注册号:NCT02223377。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
175
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, the official publication of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA), is a monthly journal that publishes peer-reviewed scientific and clinical studies to advance the understanding and clinical application of regional techniques for surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. Coverage includes intraoperative regional techniques, perioperative pain, chronic pain, obstetric anesthesia, pediatric anesthesia, outcome studies, and complications. Published for over thirty years, this respected journal also serves as the official publication of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy (ESRA), the Asian and Oceanic Society of Regional Anesthesia (AOSRA), the Latin American Society of Regional Anesthesia (LASRA), the African Society for Regional Anesthesia (AFSRA), and the Academy of Regional Anaesthesia of India (AORA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信