A Shift in Conceptual Thinking of Panfacial Fracture Sequencing: The Major Fragment Theory.

IF 0.4 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction Pub Date : 2025-01-03 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.3390/cmtr18010003
Patrick Wong, Antonio Atte, David Powers, Paul Tiwana
{"title":"A Shift in Conceptual Thinking of Panfacial Fracture Sequencing: The Major Fragment Theory.","authors":"Patrick Wong, Antonio Atte, David Powers, Paul Tiwana","doi":"10.3390/cmtr18010003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>A literature review of relevant publications regarding panfacial fracture sequencing.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To review the current landscape of sequencing of panfacial trauma and propose the utilization of the Major Fragment Theory when conventional sequencing techniques are inadequate.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a review of existing literature on panfacial fracture management, focusing on sequencing techniques. Additionally, we analyzed unique fracture patterns to identify instances where conventional sequencing may be insufficient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Existing literature emphasizes directional-based sequencing techniques for panfacial fracture reduction. However, unique fracture patterns often necessitate deviation from these sequences. The Major Fragment Theory suggests prioritizing the reduction of larger fragments over conventional sequencing, particularly when dealing with complex fractures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While directional-based sequencing techniques provide a valuable framework for panfacial fracture management and almost any approach can be utilized successfully, the Major Fragment Theory offers a complementary approach for cases where conventional sequencing falls short. Incorporating this theory into practice may enhance outcomes in the treatment of panfacial fractures.</p>","PeriodicalId":46447,"journal":{"name":"Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction","volume":"18 1","pages":"3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11977491/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/cmtr18010003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: A literature review of relevant publications regarding panfacial fracture sequencing.

Objective: To review the current landscape of sequencing of panfacial trauma and propose the utilization of the Major Fragment Theory when conventional sequencing techniques are inadequate.

Methods: We conducted a review of existing literature on panfacial fracture management, focusing on sequencing techniques. Additionally, we analyzed unique fracture patterns to identify instances where conventional sequencing may be insufficient.

Results: Existing literature emphasizes directional-based sequencing techniques for panfacial fracture reduction. However, unique fracture patterns often necessitate deviation from these sequences. The Major Fragment Theory suggests prioritizing the reduction of larger fragments over conventional sequencing, particularly when dealing with complex fractures.

Conclusions: While directional-based sequencing techniques provide a valuable framework for panfacial fracture management and almost any approach can be utilized successfully, the Major Fragment Theory offers a complementary approach for cases where conventional sequencing falls short. Incorporating this theory into practice may enhance outcomes in the treatment of panfacial fractures.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

全面骨折序列概念思维的转变:主要碎片理论。
研究设计:对有关全面骨折测序的相关出版物进行文献回顾。目的:回顾目前全面外伤的测序现状,并在常规测序技术不足的情况下提出大片段理论的应用。方法:我们回顾了现有的关于全面骨折治疗的文献,重点是测序技术。此外,我们还分析了独特的裂缝模式,以确定常规测序可能不足的情况。结果:现有文献强调基于方向的测序技术用于全面骨折复位。然而,由于独特的裂缝模式,通常需要偏离这些序列。主要碎片理论建议优先减少较大的碎片,而不是传统的测序,特别是在处理复杂的裂缝时。结论:虽然基于方向的测序技术为全面骨折治疗提供了一个有价值的框架,而且几乎任何方法都可以成功地应用,但主要碎片理论为传统测序不足的情况提供了一种补充方法。将这一理论应用到实践中可以提高全面骨折的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction
Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信