Predictive performance of population pharmacokinetic models in InsightRX® for model-informed precision dosing for Cefepime.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Pharmacotherapy Pub Date : 2025-05-12 DOI:10.1002/phar.70029
Christina König, Joseph L Kuti, Andrew J Fratoni
{"title":"Predictive performance of population pharmacokinetic models in InsightRX® for model-informed precision dosing for Cefepime.","authors":"Christina König, Joseph L Kuti, Andrew J Fratoni","doi":"10.1002/phar.70029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) is a promising tool used to ensure therapeutic antimicrobial concentrations. Model selection and sampling strategy might lead to different pharmacokinetic (PK) parameter estimates. Herein, we assess the predictive performance for cefepime PK in two models implemented within the InsightRX software using differing sampling approaches.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Historic cefepime PK data and individual Bayesian estimates in predominantly critically ill patients, some of whom had extracorporeal support, served as the reference standard. Two population PK models (A; B) were evaluated using four sampling scenarios: (i) trough only, (ii) midpoint only, (iii) trough + midpoint, and (iv) peak + midpoint + trough. The median prediction error (MPE) and median absolute prediction error (MAPE) were calculated for clearance (CL) and volume of central compartment (V<sub>c</sub>). Predicted categorical achievement of ≥70% time that the free drug concentration was greater than the minimum inhibitory concentration [fT>MIC<sub>(8/16mg/L)</sub>] was compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MAPE and MPE for CL and V<sub>c</sub> resulted in variability that was dependent on model and sampling strategy. Both models' overall MPE and MAPE for CL were <±20 and <30% for all tested scenarios, respectively, with a low MPE of -2.4% to 4.4% on CL for sampling scenario 4. For V<sub>c</sub>, MPE and MAPE were >±20 and >30% for the majority of test scenarios across both models, respectively. When excluding patients with extracorporeal support, MPE/MAPE for V<sub>c</sub> decreased to 3.7-4.8/23.3%-34.5% and -7.9-2.5/25.2%-29.6% for model A and B, respectively. Using each model and sampling scheme, only four patients had discordant predicted achievement of ≥70% fT>MIC<sub>(8/16mg/L)</sub>.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These two population PK models and all sampling scenarios demonstrated acceptable prediction of cefepime PK parameters and pharmacodynamic exposures; therefore, they demonstrated suitability for utilizing MIPD for cefepime therapeutic drug monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":20013,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/phar.70029","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) is a promising tool used to ensure therapeutic antimicrobial concentrations. Model selection and sampling strategy might lead to different pharmacokinetic (PK) parameter estimates. Herein, we assess the predictive performance for cefepime PK in two models implemented within the InsightRX software using differing sampling approaches.

Methods: Historic cefepime PK data and individual Bayesian estimates in predominantly critically ill patients, some of whom had extracorporeal support, served as the reference standard. Two population PK models (A; B) were evaluated using four sampling scenarios: (i) trough only, (ii) midpoint only, (iii) trough + midpoint, and (iv) peak + midpoint + trough. The median prediction error (MPE) and median absolute prediction error (MAPE) were calculated for clearance (CL) and volume of central compartment (Vc). Predicted categorical achievement of ≥70% time that the free drug concentration was greater than the minimum inhibitory concentration [fT>MIC(8/16mg/L)] was compared.

Results: MAPE and MPE for CL and Vc resulted in variability that was dependent on model and sampling strategy. Both models' overall MPE and MAPE for CL were <±20 and <30% for all tested scenarios, respectively, with a low MPE of -2.4% to 4.4% on CL for sampling scenario 4. For Vc, MPE and MAPE were >±20 and >30% for the majority of test scenarios across both models, respectively. When excluding patients with extracorporeal support, MPE/MAPE for Vc decreased to 3.7-4.8/23.3%-34.5% and -7.9-2.5/25.2%-29.6% for model A and B, respectively. Using each model and sampling scheme, only four patients had discordant predicted achievement of ≥70% fT>MIC(8/16mg/L).

Conclusions: These two population PK models and all sampling scenarios demonstrated acceptable prediction of cefepime PK parameters and pharmacodynamic exposures; therefore, they demonstrated suitability for utilizing MIPD for cefepime therapeutic drug monitoring.

InsightRX®群体药代动力学模型预测头孢吡肟精确给药的性能
背景:模型信息精确给药(MIPD)是一种很有前途的工具,用于确保治疗性抗菌药物浓度。模型选择和抽样策略可能导致不同的药代动力学(PK)参数估计。在本文中,我们使用不同的采样方法在InsightRX软件中实现的两个模型中评估头孢吡肟PK的预测性能。方法:以危重患者为主,部分患者有体外支持,以头孢吡肟的历史药代动力学数据和个体贝叶斯估计作为参考标准。两种种群PK模型(A;B)采用四种抽样方案进行评估:(i)仅波谷,(ii)仅中点,(iii)波谷+中点,(iv)峰值+中点+波谷。计算间隙(CL)和中央室容积(Vc)的中位预测误差(MPE)和中位绝对预测误差(MAPE)。比较游离药物浓度大于最小抑制浓度[fT>MIC(8/16mg/L)]的预测分类成就≥70%的时间。结果:CL和Vc的MAPE和MPE导致了依赖于模型和采样策略的变异性。两种模型对CL的总体MPE和MAPE均为c,在两种模型的大多数测试场景中,MPE和MAPE分别为bb0±20和>30%。排除体外支持患者后,A、B模型Vc的MPE/MAPE分别降至3.7 ~ 4.8/23.3% ~ 34.5%和-7.9 ~ 2.5/25.2% ~ 29.6%。使用每种模型和抽样方案,只有4例患者预测达到≥70% fT>MIC(8/16mg/L)不一致。结论:这两种人群PK模型和所有采样情景对头孢吡肟PK参数和药效学暴露的预测均可接受;因此,他们证明了MIPD用于头孢吡肟治疗药物监测的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pharmacotherapy
Pharmacotherapy 医学-药学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
2.40%
发文量
93
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pharmacotherapy is devoted to publication of original research articles on all aspects of human pharmacology and review articles on drugs and drug therapy. The Editors and Editorial Board invite original research reports on pharmacokinetic, bioavailability, and drug interaction studies, clinical trials, investigations of specific pharmacological properties of drugs, and related topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信