[Therapeutic Adequacy in Nine Emergency Departments in Chile: When and How It Is Applied in Emergency Care].

Revista medica de Chile Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-20 DOI:10.4067/s0034-98872025000200111
Diego Escudero, Consuelo Torres, Javier Pascual, David Acuña
{"title":"[Therapeutic Adequacy in Nine Emergency Departments in Chile: When and How It Is Applied in Emergency Care].","authors":"Diego Escudero, Consuelo Torres, Javier Pascual, David Acuña","doi":"10.4067/s0034-98872025000200111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Therapeutic Adequacy (TA) in Emergency Departments (EDs) aims to avoid futile medical interventions in terminally ill or critically ill patients, prioritizing their quality of life. This descriptive, cross-sectional, observational study analyzed the criteria used by physicians in high-complexity EDs in Chile to indicate TA, while also assessing their preparedness and ethical perceptions.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>Examine the criteria that physicians in high-complexity Emergency Departments (EDs) in Chile use to determine Therapeutic Adequacy (TA) in terminally ill or critically ill patients, while also assessing their level of preparedness and ethical perceptions regarding these decisions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 14-item closed survey, based on previous studies, was distributed among physicians from 9 high-complexity EDs between February and October 2023. A total of 70 responses were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>TA was performed more than once a month by 83% of respondents, with patient functionality (97%), chronic diseases (84%), and age (69%) being the most frequently considered criteria. The most common measures included refraining from resuscitation (97%) and mechanical ventilation (94%). While 65% of participants felt prepared to make these decisions, this figure increased to 85% among emergency specialists. However, 67% reported no formal training in bioethics, and 55% expressed discomfort with withdrawing therapeutic measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TA is a frequent practice in EDs, mainly involving decisions not to initiate treatments. Despite this, there is limited formal training in bioethics, and individual decision-making predominates. This highlights the need to enhance bioethics education, foster collaborative decision-making, and implement hospital protocols that involve patients and their families to ensure an ethical, patient-centered approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":101370,"journal":{"name":"Revista medica de Chile","volume":"153 2","pages":"111-118"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista medica de Chile","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0034-98872025000200111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Therapeutic Adequacy (TA) in Emergency Departments (EDs) aims to avoid futile medical interventions in terminally ill or critically ill patients, prioritizing their quality of life. This descriptive, cross-sectional, observational study analyzed the criteria used by physicians in high-complexity EDs in Chile to indicate TA, while also assessing their preparedness and ethical perceptions.

Aim: Examine the criteria that physicians in high-complexity Emergency Departments (EDs) in Chile use to determine Therapeutic Adequacy (TA) in terminally ill or critically ill patients, while also assessing their level of preparedness and ethical perceptions regarding these decisions.

Methods: A 14-item closed survey, based on previous studies, was distributed among physicians from 9 high-complexity EDs between February and October 2023. A total of 70 responses were collected.

Results: TA was performed more than once a month by 83% of respondents, with patient functionality (97%), chronic diseases (84%), and age (69%) being the most frequently considered criteria. The most common measures included refraining from resuscitation (97%) and mechanical ventilation (94%). While 65% of participants felt prepared to make these decisions, this figure increased to 85% among emergency specialists. However, 67% reported no formal training in bioethics, and 55% expressed discomfort with withdrawing therapeutic measures.

Conclusions: TA is a frequent practice in EDs, mainly involving decisions not to initiate treatments. Despite this, there is limited formal training in bioethics, and individual decision-making predominates. This highlights the need to enhance bioethics education, foster collaborative decision-making, and implement hospital protocols that involve patients and their families to ensure an ethical, patient-centered approach.

[智利九个急诊科的治疗充足性:何时以及如何应用于急诊护理]。
急诊科(EDs)的治疗充分性(TA)旨在避免对绝症或危重症患者进行无效的医疗干预,优先考虑他们的生活质量。这项描述性、横断面性、观察性研究分析了智利高复杂性急诊科医生用于指示TA的标准,同时也评估了他们的准备和道德观念。目的:检查智利高复杂性急诊科(EDs)的医生用于确定绝症或危重症患者治疗充分性(TA)的标准,同时也评估他们对这些决定的准备水平和道德观念。方法:在以往研究的基础上,于2023年2月至10月对9个高复杂性急诊科的医生进行14项封闭式调查。共收集了70份回复。结果:83%的应答者每月进行一次以上的TA,患者功能(97%)、慢性疾病(84%)和年龄(69%)是最常考虑的标准。最常见的措施包括避免复苏(97%)和机械通气(94%)。65%的参与者认为自己准备好了做出这些决定,而在急诊专家中,这一数字上升到了85%。然而,67%的人表示没有接受过正式的生物伦理学培训,55%的人表示对撤销治疗措施感到不适。结论:TA是急诊科常见的做法,主要涉及不开始治疗的决定。尽管如此,生物伦理学方面的正式培训有限,个人决策占主导地位。这突出表明需要加强生物伦理教育,促进协作决策,并实施涉及患者及其家属的医院协议,以确保道德,以患者为中心的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信