Combined effect of continuous glucose monitoring and semaglutide: analysis of administrative claims.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Poorva M Nemlekar, Katia L Hannah, Courtney R Green, Thomas Grace, Peter M Lynch, Jessica R Castle, Gregory J Norman
{"title":"Combined effect of continuous glucose monitoring and semaglutide: analysis of administrative claims.","authors":"Poorva M Nemlekar, Katia L Hannah, Courtney R Green, Thomas Grace, Peter M Lynch, Jessica R Castle, Gregory J Norman","doi":"10.37765/ajmc.2025.89719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study evaluated whether the combined use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, was associated with larger hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) improvements compared with use of semaglutide alone.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Using US health care claims data from the Optum Clinformatics database, this retrospective analysis identified adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) using semaglutide.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The CGM cohort had at least 1 CGM-related claim between January 1, 2019, and September 30, 2022. Random index dates were used in the control (non-CGM) cohort. At least 1 laboratory HbA1c value was required during baseline and follow-up periods. Outcomes included change in HbA1c and the proportion of people who reached American Diabetes Association (ADA) or Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) HbA1c targets of less than 7.0% or less than 8.0%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 21,247 people with T2D were identified, with 18,488 in the control group and 2759 using CGM. Overall, a significantly greater reduction in HbA1c was observed in the CGM cohort compared with the control group (difference-in-differences, -0.55%; 95% CI, -0.64% to -0.47%; P < .0001). Among CGM users, the proportion meeting the ADA target of HbA1c less than 7.0% nearly doubled, and the proportion achieving the HEDIS target of HbA1c less than 8.0% increased by more than 50%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results suggest that CGM provides an additive benefit to semaglutide, leading to greater decreases in HbA1c. Expanded use of these complementary therapies in the primary care setting could enable more people with T2D to achieve their glycemic goals.</p>","PeriodicalId":50808,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Managed Care","volume":"31 4","pages":"183-188"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Managed Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2025.89719","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study evaluated whether the combined use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, was associated with larger hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) improvements compared with use of semaglutide alone.

Study design: Using US health care claims data from the Optum Clinformatics database, this retrospective analysis identified adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) using semaglutide.

Methods: The CGM cohort had at least 1 CGM-related claim between January 1, 2019, and September 30, 2022. Random index dates were used in the control (non-CGM) cohort. At least 1 laboratory HbA1c value was required during baseline and follow-up periods. Outcomes included change in HbA1c and the proportion of people who reached American Diabetes Association (ADA) or Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) HbA1c targets of less than 7.0% or less than 8.0%, respectively.

Results: A total of 21,247 people with T2D were identified, with 18,488 in the control group and 2759 using CGM. Overall, a significantly greater reduction in HbA1c was observed in the CGM cohort compared with the control group (difference-in-differences, -0.55%; 95% CI, -0.64% to -0.47%; P < .0001). Among CGM users, the proportion meeting the ADA target of HbA1c less than 7.0% nearly doubled, and the proportion achieving the HEDIS target of HbA1c less than 8.0% increased by more than 50%.

Conclusions: The results suggest that CGM provides an additive benefit to semaglutide, leading to greater decreases in HbA1c. Expanded use of these complementary therapies in the primary care setting could enable more people with T2D to achieve their glycemic goals.

连续血糖监测与西马鲁肽联合应用的疗效分析。
目的:本研究评估连续血糖监测(CGM)和西马鲁肽(一种胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂)联合使用与单独使用西马鲁肽相比,是否与更大的血红蛋白A1c (HbA1c)改善相关。研究设计:使用来自Optum Clinformatics数据库的美国医疗保健索赔数据,本回顾性分析确定了使用西马鲁肽的成人2型糖尿病(T2D)。方法:2019年1月1日至2022年9月30日期间,CGM队列至少有1例CGM相关索赔。在对照(非cgm)队列中使用随机索引日期。在基线和随访期间至少需要1个实验室HbA1c值。结果包括HbA1c的变化以及分别达到美国糖尿病协会(ADA)或医疗保健有效性数据和信息集(HEDIS) HbA1c目标小于7.0%或小于8.0%的人群比例。结果:共发现t2dm患者21247例,对照组18488例,CGM组2759例。总体而言,与对照组相比,CGM组的HbA1c降低幅度更大(差异中的差异,-0.55%;95% CI, -0.64% ~ -0.47%;P < 0.0001)。在CGM使用者中,达到ADA目标的HbA1c低于7.0%的比例几乎翻了一番,达到HEDIS目标的HbA1c低于8.0%的比例增加了50%以上。结论:结果表明,CGM为西马鲁肽提供了一个附加的益处,导致HbA1c的更大下降。在初级保健环境中扩大使用这些补充疗法可以使更多的T2D患者达到他们的血糖目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Managed Care
American Journal of Managed Care 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
177
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Managed Care is an independent, peer-reviewed publication dedicated to disseminating clinical information to managed care physicians, clinical decision makers, and other healthcare professionals. Its aim is to stimulate scientific communication in the ever-evolving field of managed care. The American Journal of Managed Care addresses a broad range of issues relevant to clinical decision making in a cost-constrained environment and examines the impact of clinical, management, and policy interventions and programs on healthcare and economic outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信