Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors and Risk of Heart Failure in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and End-Stage Renal Disease Requiring Dialysis.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Tzu-Han Lin, Tung-Ying Hung, Liang-Yu Lin, Tzu-Chieh Lin, Ying-Jay Liou, Yu-Juei Hsu, Meng-Ting Wang
{"title":"Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors and Risk of Heart Failure in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and End-Stage Renal Disease Requiring Dialysis.","authors":"Tzu-Han Lin, Tung-Ying Hung, Liang-Yu Lin, Tzu-Chieh Lin, Ying-Jay Liou, Yu-Juei Hsu, Meng-Ting Wang","doi":"10.1002/pds.70138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Evidence on the safety of antidiabetic agents in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients requiring dialysis, a group often excluded from randomized controlled trials, is scant. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i), widely used for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) management in this group, have raised concerns regarding the risk of heart failure (HF). However, real-world evidence on HF risk with DPP-4i in dialysis-dependent diabetic patients is limited. We aimed to assess HF safety of DPP-4i compared with sulfonylureas (SU)/meglitinides in a nationwide T2DM population with ESRD requiring dialysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A new user, active comparator cohort study employing propensity score-inverse probability of treatment weighting was conducted utilizing Taiwan's nationwide healthcare claims database (2012-2020). Evaluated outcomes included hospitalizations for HF or cardiovascular death as the primary outcome, with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), all-cause mortality, and severe hypoglycemia as secondary outcomes, using weighted Cox proportional hazards models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 6882 patients initiating DPP-4i and 6174 starting SU/meglitinides, with a mean age of 66.4 years and 53.1% male. Initiation of DPP-4i versus SU/meglitinide was not associated with increased risks of HF hospitalizations, cardiovascular death, MACEs, or all-cause mortality, but was significantly tied to a 44% reduced risk of severe hypoglycemia.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study's findings indicate that in T2DM patients with ESRD requiring dialysis, DPP-4i do not elevate the risk of hospitalizations for HF, cardiovascular death, or all-cause mortality, but significantly lower the risk of severe hypoglycemia compared with SUs/meglitinides. This supports the preference for DPP-4i over SUs or meglitinides for managing T2DM in dialysis patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":19782,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","volume":"34 4","pages":"e70138"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.70138","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Evidence on the safety of antidiabetic agents in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients requiring dialysis, a group often excluded from randomized controlled trials, is scant. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i), widely used for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) management in this group, have raised concerns regarding the risk of heart failure (HF). However, real-world evidence on HF risk with DPP-4i in dialysis-dependent diabetic patients is limited. We aimed to assess HF safety of DPP-4i compared with sulfonylureas (SU)/meglitinides in a nationwide T2DM population with ESRD requiring dialysis.

Methods: A new user, active comparator cohort study employing propensity score-inverse probability of treatment weighting was conducted utilizing Taiwan's nationwide healthcare claims database (2012-2020). Evaluated outcomes included hospitalizations for HF or cardiovascular death as the primary outcome, with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), all-cause mortality, and severe hypoglycemia as secondary outcomes, using weighted Cox proportional hazards models.

Results: The study included 6882 patients initiating DPP-4i and 6174 starting SU/meglitinides, with a mean age of 66.4 years and 53.1% male. Initiation of DPP-4i versus SU/meglitinide was not associated with increased risks of HF hospitalizations, cardiovascular death, MACEs, or all-cause mortality, but was significantly tied to a 44% reduced risk of severe hypoglycemia.

Conclusions: This study's findings indicate that in T2DM patients with ESRD requiring dialysis, DPP-4i do not elevate the risk of hospitalizations for HF, cardiovascular death, or all-cause mortality, but significantly lower the risk of severe hypoglycemia compared with SUs/meglitinides. This supports the preference for DPP-4i over SUs or meglitinides for managing T2DM in dialysis patients.

二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂与需要透析的2型糖尿病和终末期肾病患者心力衰竭的风险
导读:需要透析的终末期肾病(ESRD)患者通常被排除在随机对照试验之外,关于抗糖尿病药物治疗该患者安全性的证据很少。二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂(DPP-4i)广泛用于该组2型糖尿病(T2DM)的治疗,引起了对心力衰竭(HF)风险的担忧。然而,关于透析依赖型糖尿病患者使用DPP-4i的HF风险的实际证据有限。我们旨在评估DPP-4i与磺脲类(SU)/美格列汀类药物在需要透析的T2DM ESRD患者中的HF安全性。方法:利用2012-2020年台湾医保理赔数据库,采用倾向得分-治疗加权逆概率的新用户、主动比较队列研究。评估的结果包括以心衰住院或心血管死亡为主要结果,主要不良心血管事件(mace)、全因死亡率和严重低血糖为次要结果,使用加权Cox比例风险模型。结果:研究纳入6882例起始DPP-4i和6174例起始SU/meglitinides的患者,平均年龄66.4岁,53.1%为男性。与SU/meglitinide相比,DPP-4i的启动与HF住院、心血管死亡、mace或全因死亡率的增加无关,但与严重低血糖的风险降低44%显著相关。结论:本研究结果表明,在需要透析的T2DM ESRD患者中,DPP-4i不会增加HF住院、心血管死亡或全因死亡的风险,但与SUs/meglitinides相比,显著降低了严重低血糖的风险。这支持DPP-4i优于SUs或美格列汀类药物治疗透析患者的T2DM。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
173
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The aim of Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety is to provide an international forum for the communication and evaluation of data, methods and opinion in the discipline of pharmacoepidemiology. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed reports of original research, invited reviews and a variety of guest editorials and commentaries embracing scientific, medical, statistical, legal and economic aspects of pharmacoepidemiology and post-marketing surveillance of drug safety. Appropriate material in these categories may also be considered for publication as a Brief Report. Particular areas of interest include: design, analysis, results, and interpretation of studies looking at the benefit or safety of specific pharmaceuticals, biologics, or medical devices, including studies in pharmacovigilance, postmarketing surveillance, pharmacoeconomics, patient safety, molecular pharmacoepidemiology, or any other study within the broad field of pharmacoepidemiology; comparative effectiveness research relating to pharmaceuticals, biologics, and medical devices. Comparative effectiveness research is the generation and synthesis of evidence that compares the benefits and harms of alternative methods to prevent, diagnose, treat, and monitor a clinical condition, as these methods are truly used in the real world; methodologic contributions of relevance to pharmacoepidemiology, whether original contributions, reviews of existing methods, or tutorials for how to apply the methods of pharmacoepidemiology; assessments of harm versus benefit in drug therapy; patterns of drug utilization; relationships between pharmacoepidemiology and the formulation and interpretation of regulatory guidelines; evaluations of risk management plans and programmes relating to pharmaceuticals, biologics and medical devices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信