L-Shaped Arthroscopic Posterior Capsular Release in Frozen Shoulder.

Video journal of sports medicine Pub Date : 2021-03-10 eCollection Date: 2021-03-01 DOI:10.1177/26350254211000065
Mohamed Gamal Morsy, Ahmed Hassan Waly, Mostafa Ashraf Galal, El Hussein Mohamed Ayman, Hisham Mohamed Gawish
{"title":"L-Shaped Arthroscopic Posterior Capsular Release in Frozen Shoulder.","authors":"Mohamed Gamal Morsy, Ahmed Hassan Waly, Mostafa Ashraf Galal, El Hussein Mohamed Ayman, Hisham Mohamed Gawish","doi":"10.1177/26350254211000065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The inadequate arthroscopic release of the tight posterior capsule in frozen shoulder may result in limited postoperative shoulder internal rotation.</p><p><strong>Indication: </strong>The purpose of this article is to describe an L-shaped arthroscopic posterior capsular release to overcome the limited internal rotation that may be encountered following the standard longitudinal technique. Operative intervention is indicated in patients with refractory shoulder stiffness with limitation of internal rotation of grade 0, +2, +4 (according to the Constant-Murley Score), after failure of conservative measures for 3 to 6 months. The technique is contraindicated if less than 3 months of physical therapy, shoulder stiffness due to osseous deformity, infection, or cuff tear arthropathy.</p><p><strong>Technique: </strong>After performing a standard anterior capsular release, the scope is shifted to the anterior portal to perform posterior capsular release by introducing the radiofrequency ablation device through the posterior portal. Posterior release begins from the glenoid level down to the 6 o'clock position until the back fibers of the infraspinatus muscle appear. Then the hook-tip part of the radiofrequency ablation device is used to perform a transverse release in the posterior capsule, starting from the beginning of the longitudinal limb. The transverse limb is performed in a stepwise manner going step-by-step laterally but ending before reaching the rotator cuff to avoid any damage of the cuff. After that, the shoulder was manipulated according to Codman technique.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A comparative study was performed on 43 patients with primary frozen shoulder to compare the standard longitudinal (22 patients) and L-shaped (21 patients) posterior capsular release. At the final follow-up, there was a statistically significant improvement in the internal rotation range of motion in the L-shaped group (<i>P</i> < .001). There was no loss of function over time. Moreover, there were no infections, instability, or axillary nerve injury in either group.</p><p><strong>Discussion/conclusion: </strong>Restriction of internal rotation in frozen shoulder has been attributed to posterior capsular tightness. The L-shaped arthroscopic posterior capsular release in patients with primary frozen shoulder significantly improves the postoperative internal rotation range of motion.</p>","PeriodicalId":520531,"journal":{"name":"Video journal of sports medicine","volume":"1 2","pages":"26350254211000065"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11882380/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Video journal of sports medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26350254211000065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The inadequate arthroscopic release of the tight posterior capsule in frozen shoulder may result in limited postoperative shoulder internal rotation.

Indication: The purpose of this article is to describe an L-shaped arthroscopic posterior capsular release to overcome the limited internal rotation that may be encountered following the standard longitudinal technique. Operative intervention is indicated in patients with refractory shoulder stiffness with limitation of internal rotation of grade 0, +2, +4 (according to the Constant-Murley Score), after failure of conservative measures for 3 to 6 months. The technique is contraindicated if less than 3 months of physical therapy, shoulder stiffness due to osseous deformity, infection, or cuff tear arthropathy.

Technique: After performing a standard anterior capsular release, the scope is shifted to the anterior portal to perform posterior capsular release by introducing the radiofrequency ablation device through the posterior portal. Posterior release begins from the glenoid level down to the 6 o'clock position until the back fibers of the infraspinatus muscle appear. Then the hook-tip part of the radiofrequency ablation device is used to perform a transverse release in the posterior capsule, starting from the beginning of the longitudinal limb. The transverse limb is performed in a stepwise manner going step-by-step laterally but ending before reaching the rotator cuff to avoid any damage of the cuff. After that, the shoulder was manipulated according to Codman technique.

Results: A comparative study was performed on 43 patients with primary frozen shoulder to compare the standard longitudinal (22 patients) and L-shaped (21 patients) posterior capsular release. At the final follow-up, there was a statistically significant improvement in the internal rotation range of motion in the L-shaped group (P < .001). There was no loss of function over time. Moreover, there were no infections, instability, or axillary nerve injury in either group.

Discussion/conclusion: Restriction of internal rotation in frozen shoulder has been attributed to posterior capsular tightness. The L-shaped arthroscopic posterior capsular release in patients with primary frozen shoulder significantly improves the postoperative internal rotation range of motion.

l型关节镜下肩周炎后囊膜松解术。
背景:关节镜下对肩周炎后囊不充分的松解可能导致术后肩周炎内旋受限。适应症:本文的目的是描述一种l型关节镜下后囊膜松解术,以克服标准纵向技术可能遇到的有限内旋。对于难治性肩关节僵硬,内旋受限程度为0、+2、+4级(根据Constant-Murley评分)的患者,在保守措施失败3 ~ 6个月后,需要进行手术干预。如果物理治疗少于3个月,由于骨畸形、感染或袖带撕裂引起的肩关节僵硬,该技术是禁忌的。技术:在完成标准的前囊松解术后,通过后门静脉引入射频消融装置,将瞄准镜移至前门静脉进行后囊松解术。后侧放松从肩胛水平向下到六点钟位置直到冈下肌的背部纤维出现。然后使用射频消融装置的钩尖部分在后囊膜中进行横向松解,从纵向肢体开始。横肢以循序渐进的方式进行,一步一步地向外侧移动,但在到达肩袖之前结束,以避免任何袖带损伤。之后,根据Codman技术对肩部进行操作。结果:对43例原发性肩周炎患者进行了一项比较研究,比较了标准纵向(22例)和l型(21例)后囊膜释放。在最后随访时,l型组患者的内旋活动范围有统计学意义的改善(P < 0.001)。随着时间的推移没有功能丧失。两组均无感染、不稳定、腋窝神经损伤。讨论/结论:冻结肩内旋受限归因于后囊膜紧绷。原发性肩周炎患者的l型关节镜后囊膜松解术可显著提高术后内旋活动范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信