A Humanistic Approach to Improvement: The Multiple Sclerosis Continuous Quality Improvement Collaborative Coaching Approach.

Q2 Social Sciences
Randall Scott Messier, Brant J Oliver
{"title":"A Humanistic Approach to Improvement: The Multiple Sclerosis Continuous Quality Improvement Collaborative Coaching Approach.","authors":"Randall Scott Messier, Brant J Oliver","doi":"10.7812/TPP/24.054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a costly, chronic, complex condition, which requires customization of care at the system level to achieve better outcomes. The authors describe a cluster-randomized, coach-supported quality improvement (QI) intervention in the MS continuous QI (MS-CQI) Collaborative, which was a multicenter learning health system (LHS) study to improve MS outcomes (2018-2022).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors developed a coach-supported QI intervention within the MS-CQI LHS, which included aspects of standard QI approaches utilized in health care. This included a 12-step standardized QI Toolkit; team coaching twice monthly; team capability assessments; and patient-reported and clinical feedback data provided by the MS-CQI data registry. Assessments helped the coach understand clinic culture, readiness for change, QI skills and knowledge, and progress over time. The coach monitored and guided team activity and assured general adherence to the 12-step improvement process. Teams selected local QI activities within those constraints.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 3 out of the 4 MS-CQI centers were cluster randomized to the intervention and completed the study. Initial QI assessments revealed that teams perceived QI as important but had low initial skill and knowledge levels. Improved QI skills, knowledge, and engagement in the intervention improved, as teams realized ownership and perceived benefits.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The coach-supported QI intervention demonstrated basic feasibility, acceptability, QI skill advancement, and utility in the MS-CQI study. It is an example of an LHS-enabled humanistic (QI team-focused) intervention, which invests in developing capability of people involved in QI work.</p>","PeriodicalId":23037,"journal":{"name":"The Permanente journal","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Permanente journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7812/TPP/24.054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a costly, chronic, complex condition, which requires customization of care at the system level to achieve better outcomes. The authors describe a cluster-randomized, coach-supported quality improvement (QI) intervention in the MS continuous QI (MS-CQI) Collaborative, which was a multicenter learning health system (LHS) study to improve MS outcomes (2018-2022).

Methods: The authors developed a coach-supported QI intervention within the MS-CQI LHS, which included aspects of standard QI approaches utilized in health care. This included a 12-step standardized QI Toolkit; team coaching twice monthly; team capability assessments; and patient-reported and clinical feedback data provided by the MS-CQI data registry. Assessments helped the coach understand clinic culture, readiness for change, QI skills and knowledge, and progress over time. The coach monitored and guided team activity and assured general adherence to the 12-step improvement process. Teams selected local QI activities within those constraints.

Results: A total of 3 out of the 4 MS-CQI centers were cluster randomized to the intervention and completed the study. Initial QI assessments revealed that teams perceived QI as important but had low initial skill and knowledge levels. Improved QI skills, knowledge, and engagement in the intervention improved, as teams realized ownership and perceived benefits.

Conclusions: The coach-supported QI intervention demonstrated basic feasibility, acceptability, QI skill advancement, and utility in the MS-CQI study. It is an example of an LHS-enabled humanistic (QI team-focused) intervention, which invests in developing capability of people involved in QI work.

人本主义的改进方法:多发性硬化症持续质量改进协作教练方法。
背景:多发性硬化症(MS)是一种昂贵、慢性、复杂的疾病,需要在系统层面定制护理以获得更好的结果。作者描述了MS连续QI (MS- cqi)协作中的集群随机,教练支持的质量改进(QI)干预,这是一项多中心学习卫生系统(LHS)研究,旨在改善MS结果(2018-2022)。方法:作者在MS-CQI LHS中开发了教练支持的QI干预,其中包括卫生保健中使用的标准QI方法的各个方面。这包括一个12步的标准化QI工具包;每月2次团队辅导;团队能力评估;MS-CQI数据注册中心提供的患者报告和临床反馈数据。评估帮助教练了解诊所文化、对改变的准备程度、QI技能和知识,以及随着时间的推移取得的进展。教练监督和指导团队的活动,并确保普遍遵守12步改进过程。团队在这些约束条件下选择本地QI活动。结果:4个MS-CQI中心中有3个被随机分组到干预组并完成了研究。最初的QI评估显示,团队认为QI很重要,但初始技能和知识水平较低。随着团队意识到所有权和感知到的利益,干预中的QI技能、知识和参与度得到了提高。结论:在MS-CQI研究中,教练支持的QI干预显示出基本的可行性、可接受性、QI技能的提高和实用性。它是支持lhs的人文主义(以QI团队为中心)干预的一个例子,它投资于开发参与QI工作的人员的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The Permanente journal
The Permanente journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
86
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信