Patient-Reported Outcomes Program at Scale at a Cancer Center.

IF 2.8 Q2 ONCOLOGY
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-22 DOI:10.1200/CCI-24-00253
Fernanda C G Polubriaginof, Allison Lipitz-Snyderman, Susan Chimonas, Gilad J Kuperman, Peter D Stetson
{"title":"Patient-Reported Outcomes Program at Scale at a Cancer Center.","authors":"Fernanda C G Polubriaginof, Allison Lipitz-Snyderman, Susan Chimonas, Gilad J Kuperman, Peter D Stetson","doi":"10.1200/CCI-24-00253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Incorporating patient-reported outcomes (PROs) into health care processes can improve engagement with patients; however, adopting PROs at scale is challenging. The aim of this study was to describe the design, development, and adoption at scale of a comprehensive PRO program for standard of care and research at a cancer center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Requirements for a PRO program were obtained from multiple stakeholders. Components of the program included a governance process to assure a consistent and satisfactory experience for patients completing PRO questionnaires, tools to create and manage questionnaires and related content, methods to send questionnaires to relevant patients at the appropriate time, interactive tools for patients to complete the questionnaires as part of their portal experience, and integration of PRO data into workflows for clinicians. We used descriptive statistics to assess the use of the program from 2016 to 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From program launch (on February 1, 2016) until December 31, 2023, 189 unique questionnaires were developed (101 for standard-of-care, 70 for research, and 18 for quality improvement). Of the 432,497 unique patients who were assigned at least one questionnaire, 314,685 (73%) completed at least one. Of 5,948,464 questionnaires sent, 3,098,574 (52%) were completed. The median completion time was 2 minutes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Large-scale adoption of PROs at a cancer center is feasible. Key considerations for success include governance processes, attention to patient experience and clinician workflow, and the ability to manage complex inclusion criteria and timing of delivery of questionnaires. These principles should be disseminated so the full potential of PROs in health care can be realized.</p>","PeriodicalId":51626,"journal":{"name":"JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics","volume":"9 ","pages":"e2400253"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12017341/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/CCI-24-00253","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Incorporating patient-reported outcomes (PROs) into health care processes can improve engagement with patients; however, adopting PROs at scale is challenging. The aim of this study was to describe the design, development, and adoption at scale of a comprehensive PRO program for standard of care and research at a cancer center.

Methods: Requirements for a PRO program were obtained from multiple stakeholders. Components of the program included a governance process to assure a consistent and satisfactory experience for patients completing PRO questionnaires, tools to create and manage questionnaires and related content, methods to send questionnaires to relevant patients at the appropriate time, interactive tools for patients to complete the questionnaires as part of their portal experience, and integration of PRO data into workflows for clinicians. We used descriptive statistics to assess the use of the program from 2016 to 2023.

Results: From program launch (on February 1, 2016) until December 31, 2023, 189 unique questionnaires were developed (101 for standard-of-care, 70 for research, and 18 for quality improvement). Of the 432,497 unique patients who were assigned at least one questionnaire, 314,685 (73%) completed at least one. Of 5,948,464 questionnaires sent, 3,098,574 (52%) were completed. The median completion time was 2 minutes.

Conclusion: Large-scale adoption of PROs at a cancer center is feasible. Key considerations for success include governance processes, attention to patient experience and clinician workflow, and the ability to manage complex inclusion criteria and timing of delivery of questionnaires. These principles should be disseminated so the full potential of PROs in health care can be realized.

某癌症中心大规模患者报告结果项目。
目的:将患者报告的结果(PROs)纳入卫生保健流程可以改善与患者的接触;然而,大规模采用pro是具有挑战性的。本研究的目的是描述一个全面的PRO项目在癌症中心标准护理和研究中的设计、开发和大规模采用。方法:从多个利益相关者那里获得PRO程序的需求。该计划的组成部分包括一个管理流程,以确保患者完成PRO问卷的一致和满意的体验,创建和管理问卷及相关内容的工具,在适当的时间向相关患者发送问卷的方法,用于患者完成问卷的交互式工具,作为其门户体验的一部分,以及将PRO数据集成到临床医生的工作流程中。我们使用描述性统计来评估2016年至2023年该计划的使用情况。结果:从项目启动(2016年2月1日)到2023年12月31日,共开发了189份独特的问卷(101份用于标准护理,70份用于研究,18份用于质量改进)。在432,497名被分配至少一份问卷的独特患者中,314,685名(73%)完成了至少一份问卷。在发送的5,948,464份问卷中,完成了3,098,574份(52%)。平均完成时间为2分钟。结论:肿瘤中心大规模采用pro是可行的。成功的关键考虑因素包括治理流程、对患者体验和临床医生工作流程的关注,以及管理复杂的纳入标准和问卷交付时间的能力。应传播这些原则,以便充分发挥保健专业人员的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
190
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信