Risk Factors for Thyroid Function Test Abnormalities During Pregnancy: A Systematic Review of the Literature to Validate Current Risk Factors and Identify Novel Ones.
Yindi Liu, Joris A J Osinga, Spyridoula Maraka, Sofie Bliddal, Erik K Alexander, Chrysoula Dosiou, Kristien Boelaert, Gabriela Brenta, Elise Krabbendam, Jennifer L Eaton, Haixia Guan, Sun Y Lee, Lilah F Morris-Wiseman, Caroline T Nguyen, Zhongyan Shan, Rima K Dhillon-Smith, Elizabeth N Pearce, Robin P Peeters, Angela M Leung, Tim I M Korevaar
{"title":"Risk Factors for Thyroid Function Test Abnormalities During Pregnancy: A Systematic Review of the Literature to Validate Current Risk Factors and Identify Novel Ones.","authors":"Yindi Liu, Joris A J Osinga, Spyridoula Maraka, Sofie Bliddal, Erik K Alexander, Chrysoula Dosiou, Kristien Boelaert, Gabriela Brenta, Elise Krabbendam, Jennifer L Eaton, Haixia Guan, Sun Y Lee, Lilah F Morris-Wiseman, Caroline T Nguyen, Zhongyan Shan, Rima K Dhillon-Smith, Elizabeth N Pearce, Robin P Peeters, Angela M Leung, Tim I M Korevaar","doi":"10.1089/thy.2024.0743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> International guidelines recommend that the indication to perform thyroid function testing during pregnancy is based on the presence of risk factors for thyroid function test abnormalities. However, the discriminative ability of currently recommended risk factors is questionable. To inform on an update of the American Thyroid Association Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Thyroid Disease in Preconception, Pregnancy, and the Postpartum, we aimed to systematically review the literature to evaluate evidence for current risk factors and potential novel ones for thyroid function test abnormalities in pregnancy. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A systematic literature search was performed on Embase, Medline Ovid, and the Cochrane Library from inception to October 17, 2024, to identify articles on the associations of any candidate variables with thyroid function test abnormalities, thyroid antibody positivity, or results of continuous thyroid function tests in pregnancy. Additional records were identified through citation searching. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. We summarized the results using a narrative synthesis. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 81 articles were included, describing 36 candidate variables. Thyroid antibody positivity was associated with a higher risk of overt or subclinical hypothyroidism compared with antibody negativity (absolute risks: 2.4-7.0% vs. 0.1-0.2% for overt hypothyroidism and 1.9-29.0% vs. 2.0-5.7% for subclinical hypothyroidism). In cases of iodine deficiency, sufficiency, and intake above pregnancy requirements or excess, the absolute risks for subclinical hypothyroidism were 2.2-42.6%, 1.42-16.0%, and 3.8-24.3%, respectively. A limited number of studies were available for history of autoimmune diseases, family history of thyroid disease, symptoms of hypothyroidism, and history of pregnancy loss, preterm delivery, or infertility. There was little or no association of current risk factors with isolated hypothyroxinemia or (subclinical) hyperthyroidism. We did not identify novel risk factors for thyroid function test abnormalities. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Evidence for most currently recommended risk factors remains limited and heterogeneous, and no novel risk factor was identified. While risk factors can help guide thyroid function testing in pregnancy, a clinical risk assessment cannot be replaced. Future studies are needed to detect novel risk factors that can improve the accuracy and efficiency of identifying pregnant women at high risk of thyroid function test abnormalities, in particular, overt hypothyroidism.</p>","PeriodicalId":23016,"journal":{"name":"Thyroid","volume":" ","pages":"553-575"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thyroid","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2024.0743","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: International guidelines recommend that the indication to perform thyroid function testing during pregnancy is based on the presence of risk factors for thyroid function test abnormalities. However, the discriminative ability of currently recommended risk factors is questionable. To inform on an update of the American Thyroid Association Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Thyroid Disease in Preconception, Pregnancy, and the Postpartum, we aimed to systematically review the literature to evaluate evidence for current risk factors and potential novel ones for thyroid function test abnormalities in pregnancy. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed on Embase, Medline Ovid, and the Cochrane Library from inception to October 17, 2024, to identify articles on the associations of any candidate variables with thyroid function test abnormalities, thyroid antibody positivity, or results of continuous thyroid function tests in pregnancy. Additional records were identified through citation searching. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. We summarized the results using a narrative synthesis. Results: A total of 81 articles were included, describing 36 candidate variables. Thyroid antibody positivity was associated with a higher risk of overt or subclinical hypothyroidism compared with antibody negativity (absolute risks: 2.4-7.0% vs. 0.1-0.2% for overt hypothyroidism and 1.9-29.0% vs. 2.0-5.7% for subclinical hypothyroidism). In cases of iodine deficiency, sufficiency, and intake above pregnancy requirements or excess, the absolute risks for subclinical hypothyroidism were 2.2-42.6%, 1.42-16.0%, and 3.8-24.3%, respectively. A limited number of studies were available for history of autoimmune diseases, family history of thyroid disease, symptoms of hypothyroidism, and history of pregnancy loss, preterm delivery, or infertility. There was little or no association of current risk factors with isolated hypothyroxinemia or (subclinical) hyperthyroidism. We did not identify novel risk factors for thyroid function test abnormalities. Conclusions: Evidence for most currently recommended risk factors remains limited and heterogeneous, and no novel risk factor was identified. While risk factors can help guide thyroid function testing in pregnancy, a clinical risk assessment cannot be replaced. Future studies are needed to detect novel risk factors that can improve the accuracy and efficiency of identifying pregnant women at high risk of thyroid function test abnormalities, in particular, overt hypothyroidism.
背景:国际指南建议在妊娠期间进行甲状腺功能检查的指征是基于甲状腺功能检查异常的危险因素的存在。然而,目前推荐的危险因素的区分能力是值得怀疑的。为了更新美国甲状腺协会关于孕前、妊娠和产后甲状腺疾病诊断和管理的指南,我们旨在系统地回顾文献,以评估妊娠期甲状腺功能检查异常的当前危险因素和潜在新危险因素的证据。方法:系统检索Embase、Medline Ovid和Cochrane Library从成立到2024年10月17日的文献,找出任何候选变量与妊娠期甲状腺功能检查异常、甲状腺抗体阳性或连续甲状腺功能检查结果的相关性。通过引文检索确定了其他记录。使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估研究质量。我们用叙事综合的方法总结了结果。结果:共纳入81篇文章,描述了36个候选变量。与抗体阴性相比,甲状腺抗体阳性与显性或亚临床甲状腺功能减退的风险较高(绝对风险:显性甲状腺功能减退2.4-7.0% vs 0.1-0.2%,亚临床甲状腺功能减退1.9-29.0% vs 2.0-5.7%)。在碘缺乏、碘充足和碘摄入量高于妊娠要求或过量的情况下,亚临床甲状腺功能减退的绝对风险分别为2.2-42.6%、1.42-16.0%和3.8-24.3%。数量有限的研究可用于自身免疫性疾病史、甲状腺疾病家族史、甲状腺功能减退症症状、流产史、早产史或不孕症。目前的危险因素与孤立性甲状腺功能低下或(亚临床)甲状腺功能亢进很少或没有关联。我们没有发现甲状腺功能检查异常的新危险因素。结论:大多数目前推荐的危险因素的证据仍然有限和异质性,没有发现新的危险因素。虽然风险因素可以帮助指导孕期甲状腺功能测试,但临床风险评估是不可替代的。未来的研究需要发现新的危险因素,以提高识别甲状腺功能检查异常高危孕妇的准确性和效率,特别是明显的甲状腺功能减退。
期刊介绍:
This authoritative journal program, including the monthly flagship journal Thyroid, Clinical Thyroidology® (monthly), and VideoEndocrinology™ (quarterly), delivers in-depth coverage on topics from clinical application and primary care, to the latest advances in diagnostic imaging and surgical techniques and technologies, designed to optimize patient care and outcomes.
Thyroid is the leading, peer-reviewed resource for original articles, patient-focused reports, and translational research on thyroid cancer and all thyroid related diseases. The Journal delivers the latest findings on topics from primary care to clinical application, and is the exclusive source for the authoritative and updated American Thyroid Association (ATA) Guidelines for Managing Thyroid Disease.