Surgical trend including minimally invasive surgeries for ulcerative colitis in the COSUC study: the largest multicenter cohort study in Japan.

IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Koya Hida, Yoshiki Okita, Yusuke Fujii, Toru Miyake, Yoshiaki Kuriu, Yu Hidaka, Tomohiro Arita, Kiyotaka Kawaguchi, Shingo Ochi, Yusuke Fujita, Kazutaka Obama, Takeshi Naitoh
{"title":"Surgical trend including minimally invasive surgeries for ulcerative colitis in the COSUC study: the largest multicenter cohort study in Japan.","authors":"Koya Hida, Yoshiki Okita, Yusuke Fujii, Toru Miyake, Yoshiaki Kuriu, Yu Hidaka, Tomohiro Arita, Kiyotaka Kawaguchi, Shingo Ochi, Yusuke Fujita, Kazutaka Obama, Takeshi Naitoh","doi":"10.1007/s00464-025-11758-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The number of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) is increasing rapidly in Asia. No large study has evaluated the clinical outcomes of hand-sewn ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA). This study aimed to create a large database of the surgical outcomes of UC, present the trends of surgical procedures, and evaluate the impact of minimally invasive procedures on UC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data of patients first treated from 2005 to 2019 were collected; two-staged surgery data were extracted, and minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and open surgery (OS) outcomes were compared using propensity-score matching.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The data of 1558 cases were selected as the main analysis set. The number of surgical cases of UC has been increasing, with increasing proportion of MIS cases (2005: 43%, 2019: 84%). The median age of the patients increased in these 15 years (39.5-56 years old). Of 873 patients who underwent two-staged surgery, after 3:1 matching, 408 MIS and 176 OS cases were compared. Hand-sewn anastomoses were performed in 293 MIS (72.0%) and 142 OS-IPAA (80.7%) cases. The proportion of early complications (≥ Grade 3) did not vary between the two groups. Intraoperative blood loss was lower and blood transfusions were less frequent in the MIS group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The proportion of MIS for UC has rapidly increased over the past 15 years. The total number of MIS and OS complications did not vary significantly between the groups. The short-term advantages of MIS include reduced blood loss and less necessity for blood transfusions.</p>","PeriodicalId":22174,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"3911-3920"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-025-11758-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The number of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) is increasing rapidly in Asia. No large study has evaluated the clinical outcomes of hand-sewn ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA). This study aimed to create a large database of the surgical outcomes of UC, present the trends of surgical procedures, and evaluate the impact of minimally invasive procedures on UC.

Methods: Data of patients first treated from 2005 to 2019 were collected; two-staged surgery data were extracted, and minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and open surgery (OS) outcomes were compared using propensity-score matching.

Results: The data of 1558 cases were selected as the main analysis set. The number of surgical cases of UC has been increasing, with increasing proportion of MIS cases (2005: 43%, 2019: 84%). The median age of the patients increased in these 15 years (39.5-56 years old). Of 873 patients who underwent two-staged surgery, after 3:1 matching, 408 MIS and 176 OS cases were compared. Hand-sewn anastomoses were performed in 293 MIS (72.0%) and 142 OS-IPAA (80.7%) cases. The proportion of early complications (≥ Grade 3) did not vary between the two groups. Intraoperative blood loss was lower and blood transfusions were less frequent in the MIS group.

Conclusions: The proportion of MIS for UC has rapidly increased over the past 15 years. The total number of MIS and OS complications did not vary significantly between the groups. The short-term advantages of MIS include reduced blood loss and less necessity for blood transfusions.

COSUC研究中包括微创手术治疗溃疡性结肠炎的外科趋势:日本最大的多中心队列研究
背景:亚洲溃疡性结肠炎(UC)患者数量正在迅速增加。尚未有大型研究评估手工缝合回肠袋-肛门吻合术(IPAA)的临床结果。本研究旨在建立UC手术结果的大型数据库,介绍手术方法的发展趋势,并评估微创手术对UC的影响。方法:收集2005 - 2019年首次治疗的患者资料;提取两期手术数据,并使用倾向评分匹配比较微创手术(MIS)和开放手术(OS)的结果。结果:选取1558例资料作为主要分析集。UC的手术病例数量不断增加,MIS病例的比例不断增加(2005年:43%,2019年:84%)。患者的中位年龄在这15年中有所增加(39.5-56岁)。在873例两期手术患者中,经过3:1匹配,比较408例MIS和176例OS。MIS 293例(72.0%),OS-IPAA 142例(80.7%)行手工缝合吻合。两组患者早期并发症(≥3级)的比例无差异。MIS组术中出血量较低,输血次数较少。结论:在过去的15年中,UC的MIS比例迅速增加。两组间MIS和OS并发症总数无显著差异。MIS的短期优势包括减少失血量和减少输血的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
12.90%
发文量
890
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Uniquely positioned at the interface between various medical and surgical disciplines, Surgical Endoscopy serves as a focal point for the international surgical community to exchange information on practice, theory, and research. Topics covered in the journal include: -Surgical aspects of: Interventional endoscopy, Ultrasound, Other techniques in the fields of gastroenterology, obstetrics, gynecology, and urology, -Gastroenterologic surgery -Thoracic surgery -Traumatic surgery -Orthopedic surgery -Pediatric surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信