Precision acute medical care through "-omic" analyses: a scoping review.

Cole Ettingoff, Megan Von Isenburg, Drew Birrenkott, Hirotaka Ata, Chris Kabrhel, Basmah Safdar, Kohei Hasegawa, Andrew Monte, Frederick Fred Korley, Cosby Gabrielle Arnold, Laura Heitsch, Matthew Strehlow, Alexander T Limkakeng
{"title":"Precision acute medical care through \"-omic\" analyses: a scoping review.","authors":"Cole Ettingoff, Megan Von Isenburg, Drew Birrenkott, Hirotaka Ata, Chris Kabrhel, Basmah Safdar, Kohei Hasegawa, Andrew Monte, Frederick Fred Korley, Cosby Gabrielle Arnold, Laura Heitsch, Matthew Strehlow, Alexander T Limkakeng","doi":"10.1080/17410541.2025.2499438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>-Omics technologies - including genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics - are increasingly used in acute care settings. However, the current extent of this research has not been systematically assessed.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To characterize how -omics analyses are applied to acute medical conditions and identify trends, gaps, and implementation barriers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eligible studies included human subjects with acute conditions and used -omics biosample analyses for diagnostic, prognostic, or predictive purposes. Feedback from the SAEM Precision Emergency Medicine Consensus Conference informed the search and inclusion criteria. Studies of infectious diseases were excluded for separate analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 7,531 screened articles, 421 met inclusion criteria. Most were observational cohort studies, with single nucleotide polymorphism analysis being most common. Cardiovascular and trauma-related conditions were frequently studied. Only 12.4% of studies included children, and just 7 focused exclusively on older adults. One-third were conducted outside of emergency departments. Many studies addressed diverse, uncategorized acute conditions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While -omics research in acute care is growing, it remains predominantly observational with limited clinical implementation. Barriers include delayed turnaround times, insufficient EHR integration, and underrepresentation of vulnerable populations. Advancing this field requires cross-disciplinary collaboration, focused research priorities, and investment in implementation studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":94167,"journal":{"name":"Personalized medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personalized medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17410541.2025.2499438","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: -Omics technologies - including genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics - are increasingly used in acute care settings. However, the current extent of this research has not been systematically assessed.

Objectives: To characterize how -omics analyses are applied to acute medical conditions and identify trends, gaps, and implementation barriers.

Methods: Eligible studies included human subjects with acute conditions and used -omics biosample analyses for diagnostic, prognostic, or predictive purposes. Feedback from the SAEM Precision Emergency Medicine Consensus Conference informed the search and inclusion criteria. Studies of infectious diseases were excluded for separate analysis.

Results: Of 7,531 screened articles, 421 met inclusion criteria. Most were observational cohort studies, with single nucleotide polymorphism analysis being most common. Cardiovascular and trauma-related conditions were frequently studied. Only 12.4% of studies included children, and just 7 focused exclusively on older adults. One-third were conducted outside of emergency departments. Many studies addressed diverse, uncategorized acute conditions.

Conclusions: While -omics research in acute care is growing, it remains predominantly observational with limited clinical implementation. Barriers include delayed turnaround times, insufficient EHR integration, and underrepresentation of vulnerable populations. Advancing this field requires cross-disciplinary collaboration, focused research priorities, and investment in implementation studies.

通过“基因组学”分析的精准急性医疗护理:范围综述。
背景:组学技术——包括基因组学、转录组学、蛋白质组学和代谢组学——越来越多地用于急性护理环境。然而,目前这项研究的程度还没有得到系统的评估。目的:描述组学分析如何应用于急性医疗状况,并确定趋势、差距和实施障碍。方法:符合条件的研究包括急性疾病的人类受试者和用于诊断、预后或预测目的的组学生物样本分析。来自SAEM精确急诊医学共识会议的反馈通知了搜索和纳入标准。传染病的研究被排除在单独分析之外。结果:在7531篇筛选的文章中,421篇符合纳入标准。大多数是观察性队列研究,单核苷酸多态性分析是最常见的。心血管和创伤相关疾病经常被研究。只有12.4%的研究包括儿童,只有7项研究专门针对老年人。三分之一是在急诊室外进行的。许多研究针对不同的、未分类的急性疾病。结论:虽然组学在急症护理中的研究正在增长,但它仍然主要是观察性的,临床应用有限。障碍包括周转时间延迟、电子病历整合不足以及弱势群体代表性不足。推进这一领域需要跨学科合作、重点研究和对实施研究的投资。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信