Estimation of household level variation in per capita calorie intake by measures of economic well-being of the household in India.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Tropical Medicine & International Health Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-22 DOI:10.1111/tmi.14097
Junaid Khan, Sanjay K Mohanty
{"title":"Estimation of household level variation in per capita calorie intake by measures of economic well-being of the household in India.","authors":"Junaid Khan, Sanjay K Mohanty","doi":"10.1111/tmi.14097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Defining economic status of the household through household-based surveys remains a challenge and the measures vary across surveys and countries. This study identifies two exclusive measures of economic wellbeing of the household-wealth index and monthly per capita non-food expenditure (MPCNFE) and examines the comparative predictability of the two measures to predict the variation in per capita calorie intake across Indian households.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Design This study has a cross-sectional design and households are the unit of analysis. Setting National Sample Survey consumption expenditure rounds, 2004-2005 and 2011-2012 for India. A total of more than 100,000 households in each of the two survey rounds were included in this study. The respective household heads were interviewed during the survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 2004-2005, a wealth-poor household from the lowest decile consumed 1881 kcal while a consumption-poor household (lowest decile) consumed only 1690 kcal, a difference of 11.3%. A slight overall increase in average calorie intake between the two survey rounds was detected (from 2016 to 2049 kcal; 2%), but the consumption-poor households (lowest decile) still had a lower average calorie intake than the wealth-poor households (1856 kcal vs. 1958 kcal; a difference of 6%). In terms of inequality, the consumption measure of economic well-being showed higher concentration index values in calorie intake compared to the wealth measure. From the multivariate OLS estimation, it was evident that the consumption framework explained higher variability in calorie (log transformed) intake across Indian households than the wealth framework.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Consumption-poor households in India are more economically underprivileged and consume fewer calories than wealth-poor households. MPCNFE as a measure of economic wellbeing better predicts the household level variation in calorie intake compared to the wealth-based measure of economic wellbeing.</p>","PeriodicalId":23962,"journal":{"name":"Tropical Medicine & International Health","volume":" ","pages":"481-497"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical Medicine & International Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tmi.14097","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Defining economic status of the household through household-based surveys remains a challenge and the measures vary across surveys and countries. This study identifies two exclusive measures of economic wellbeing of the household-wealth index and monthly per capita non-food expenditure (MPCNFE) and examines the comparative predictability of the two measures to predict the variation in per capita calorie intake across Indian households.

Methods: Design This study has a cross-sectional design and households are the unit of analysis. Setting National Sample Survey consumption expenditure rounds, 2004-2005 and 2011-2012 for India. A total of more than 100,000 households in each of the two survey rounds were included in this study. The respective household heads were interviewed during the survey.

Results: In 2004-2005, a wealth-poor household from the lowest decile consumed 1881 kcal while a consumption-poor household (lowest decile) consumed only 1690 kcal, a difference of 11.3%. A slight overall increase in average calorie intake between the two survey rounds was detected (from 2016 to 2049 kcal; 2%), but the consumption-poor households (lowest decile) still had a lower average calorie intake than the wealth-poor households (1856 kcal vs. 1958 kcal; a difference of 6%). In terms of inequality, the consumption measure of economic well-being showed higher concentration index values in calorie intake compared to the wealth measure. From the multivariate OLS estimation, it was evident that the consumption framework explained higher variability in calorie (log transformed) intake across Indian households than the wealth framework.

Conclusion: Consumption-poor households in India are more economically underprivileged and consume fewer calories than wealth-poor households. MPCNFE as a measure of economic wellbeing better predicts the household level variation in calorie intake compared to the wealth-based measure of economic wellbeing.

通过衡量印度家庭的经济福利来估计家庭人均卡路里摄入量的变化。
背景和目的:通过以家庭为基础的调查确定家庭的经济地位仍然是一项挑战,不同调查和国家采取的措施各不相同。本研究确定了家庭财富指数和月人均非食品支出(MPCNFE)这两个经济福利的专有指标,并检验了这两个指标的相对可预测性,以预测印度家庭人均卡路里摄入量的变化。本研究采用横断面设计,以住户为分析单位。设定2004-2005年和2011-2012年印度全国抽样调查消费支出回合数。在这两轮调查中,每轮都有超过10万户家庭被纳入本研究。调查期间,各户主均接受访问。结果:2004-2005年,来自最低十分位数的贫富家庭消耗1881千卡,而消费贫困家庭(最低十分位数)仅消耗1690千卡,差异为11.3%。在两轮调查之间,平均卡路里摄入量总体上略有增加(从2016年到2049千卡;2%),但消费贫困家庭(最低十分之一)的平均卡路里摄入量仍低于富裕贫困家庭(1856千卡vs 1958千卡;相差6%)。在不平等方面,与财富衡量相比,经济福利的消费衡量在卡路里摄入方面显示出更高的集中指数值。从多元OLS估计来看,很明显,消费框架比财富框架解释了印度家庭卡路里(对数转换)摄入量的更高变异性。结论:印度的消费贫困家庭在经济上更贫困,比富裕贫困家庭消耗更少的卡路里。与以财富为基础的经济福利衡量标准相比,MPCNFE作为经济福利的衡量标准能更好地预测家庭卡路里摄入量的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tropical Medicine & International Health
Tropical Medicine & International Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
129
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Tropical Medicine & International Health is published on behalf of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Foundation Tropical Medicine and International Health, Belgian Institute of Tropical Medicine and Bernhard-Nocht-Institute for Tropical Medicine. Tropical Medicine & International Health is the official journal of the Federation of European Societies for Tropical Medicine and International Health (FESTMIH).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信