Psychotropic Polypharmacy and QT Prolonging Medications in Hospitalized Patients.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Joel Moore, Isabella Singh, Ruby Tszwai Au, Genevieve Gabb, Joanne Eng-Frost, Elizabeth Hotham, Sepehr Shakib, Vijayaprakash Suppiah
{"title":"Psychotropic Polypharmacy and QT Prolonging Medications in Hospitalized Patients.","authors":"Joel Moore, Isabella Singh, Ruby Tszwai Au, Genevieve Gabb, Joanne Eng-Frost, Elizabeth Hotham, Sepehr Shakib, Vijayaprakash Suppiah","doi":"10.1002/prp2.70107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It is common for patients with mental illnesses to be prescribed multiple psychotropic medications to effectively manage their conditions. Psychotropic polypharmacy has been shown to potentiate and increase the risks of several adverse effects, including QT prolongation. This study aimed to investigate the prescribing trends of and differences in prescribing of QT-prolonging medications (QTPMs) at admission and discharge in hospitalized patients. This retrospective observational study utilized inpatient data from three public hospitals between January and December 2019. QTPMs were classified according to the AZCERT classification. QTPMs doses were evaluated by calculating the ratio of prescribed daily dose (PDD) to the defined daily dose (DDD). Subgroup analyses showed significant differences between patient groups on admission and discharge (all p < 0.001). Mean QTPMs decreased significantly between the two time points only in patients admitted to acute medical and geriatric units (p < 0.001). PDD/DDD ratio for conditional risk QTPMs in acute mental health unit (AMHU) patients was increased at discharge (p = 0.038). Patients admitted to acute medical and geriatric units were four and eight times more likely to be discharged with one QTPM with known risk in combination with more QTPMs with conditional risk. Logistic regression showed significant relationships with age and total number of regular medicines at admission for those prescribed high-dose QTPMs at discharge. The findings underscore the necessity for enhanced monitoring of QTPMs in hospitalized patients, particularly for those at higher risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":19948,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacology Research & Perspectives","volume":"13 3","pages":"e70107"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12041124/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacology Research & Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/prp2.70107","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is common for patients with mental illnesses to be prescribed multiple psychotropic medications to effectively manage their conditions. Psychotropic polypharmacy has been shown to potentiate and increase the risks of several adverse effects, including QT prolongation. This study aimed to investigate the prescribing trends of and differences in prescribing of QT-prolonging medications (QTPMs) at admission and discharge in hospitalized patients. This retrospective observational study utilized inpatient data from three public hospitals between January and December 2019. QTPMs were classified according to the AZCERT classification. QTPMs doses were evaluated by calculating the ratio of prescribed daily dose (PDD) to the defined daily dose (DDD). Subgroup analyses showed significant differences between patient groups on admission and discharge (all p < 0.001). Mean QTPMs decreased significantly between the two time points only in patients admitted to acute medical and geriatric units (p < 0.001). PDD/DDD ratio for conditional risk QTPMs in acute mental health unit (AMHU) patients was increased at discharge (p = 0.038). Patients admitted to acute medical and geriatric units were four and eight times more likely to be discharged with one QTPM with known risk in combination with more QTPMs with conditional risk. Logistic regression showed significant relationships with age and total number of regular medicines at admission for those prescribed high-dose QTPMs at discharge. The findings underscore the necessity for enhanced monitoring of QTPMs in hospitalized patients, particularly for those at higher risk.

住院患者的精神药物综合用药和QT延长药物。
对于患有精神疾病的患者来说,处方多种精神药物来有效地控制他们的病情是很常见的。多种精神药物已被证明可以增强和增加一些不良反应的风险,包括QT间期延长。本研究旨在探讨住院患者入院和出院时使用延长qt (qt - extension)药物的趋势及差异。这项回顾性观察性研究利用了2019年1月至12月期间三家公立医院的住院患者数据。按照AZCERT分类对qtpm进行分类。通过计算处方日剂量(PDD)与定义日剂量(DDD)之比来评估QTPMs的剂量。亚组分析显示两组患者在入院和出院时存在显著差异
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
Pharmacology Research & Perspectives Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
120
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: PR&P is jointly published by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (ASPET), the British Pharmacological Society (BPS), and Wiley. PR&P is a bi-monthly open access journal that publishes a range of article types, including: target validation (preclinical papers that show a hypothesis is incorrect or papers on drugs that have failed in early clinical development); drug discovery reviews (strategy, hypotheses, and data resulting in a successful therapeutic drug); frontiers in translational medicine (drug and target validation for an unmet therapeutic need); pharmacological hypotheses (reviews that are oriented to inform a novel hypothesis); and replication studies (work that refutes key findings [failed replication] and work that validates key findings). PR&P publishes papers submitted directly to the journal and those referred from the journals of ASPET and the BPS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信