The missing link? Pharmacists' perspectives on discontinuation of long-term antidepressants: a qualitative study.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology Pub Date : 2025-04-27 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20451253251333977
Ellen Van Leeuwen, Els Mehuys, Chris F Johnson, An-Sofie De Keyzer, Koen Boussery, Thierry Christiaens
{"title":"The missing link? Pharmacists' perspectives on discontinuation of long-term antidepressants: a qualitative study.","authors":"Ellen Van Leeuwen, Els Mehuys, Chris F Johnson, An-Sofie De Keyzer, Koen Boussery, Thierry Christiaens","doi":"10.1177/20451253251333977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Long-term use of antidepressant drugs is widespread despite guidelines recommending limited duration. General practitioners (GPs) play a central role in reviewing and discontinuing antidepressants, although they hesitate to initiate a discussion about the long-term use. The potential role of pharmacists in this process is underexplored, despite their pharmaceutical expertise and accessibility.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore community pharmacists' perspectives on the discontinuation of long-term use of antidepressants, and the barriers and facilitators to their involvement in this process.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Qualitative study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 14 Belgian community pharmacists until data saturation. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and thematically analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four themes emerged. (1) \"Antidepressants at the pharmacy: a persistent taboo\" showed pharmacists' hesitancy to initiate discontinuation discussions due to societal stigma and fear of being perceived as nosy. (2) \"Balancing risks vs benefits\" highlights that pharmacists were primarily concerned about relapse in stable patients but recognized that a patient request from a patient experiencing side effects may facilitate discontinuation. (3) \"Is this my role?,\" pharmacists viewed GPs as the primary decision-makers in discontinuation, limiting their role to supporting GP treatment decisions. Key facilitators for discontinuation included a GP's decision to stop and a motivated patient. Regular reviews by the pharmacist could also facilitate the discontinuation process. (4) Optimizing pharmacists' role' with a strong need for GP collaboration, and acknowledging a need to optimize knowledge and skills to support antidepressant discontinuation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study reveals that pharmacists viewed GPs as pivotal in the discontinuation process, as they make the decisions, while they see their role as supportive, following the doctor's decision. However, they faced significant barriers to discontinuing long-term antidepressants, including fear of relapse, societal taboo, and unclear responsibilities. More education, confidence building, and better collaboration with GPs could empower pharmacists to play a proactive role, improving the antidepressant discontinuation process.</p>","PeriodicalId":23127,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology","volume":"15 ","pages":"20451253251333977"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12038199/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20451253251333977","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Long-term use of antidepressant drugs is widespread despite guidelines recommending limited duration. General practitioners (GPs) play a central role in reviewing and discontinuing antidepressants, although they hesitate to initiate a discussion about the long-term use. The potential role of pharmacists in this process is underexplored, despite their pharmaceutical expertise and accessibility.

Objectives: To explore community pharmacists' perspectives on the discontinuation of long-term use of antidepressants, and the barriers and facilitators to their involvement in this process.

Design: Qualitative study.

Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 14 Belgian community pharmacists until data saturation. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and thematically analyzed.

Results: Four themes emerged. (1) "Antidepressants at the pharmacy: a persistent taboo" showed pharmacists' hesitancy to initiate discontinuation discussions due to societal stigma and fear of being perceived as nosy. (2) "Balancing risks vs benefits" highlights that pharmacists were primarily concerned about relapse in stable patients but recognized that a patient request from a patient experiencing side effects may facilitate discontinuation. (3) "Is this my role?," pharmacists viewed GPs as the primary decision-makers in discontinuation, limiting their role to supporting GP treatment decisions. Key facilitators for discontinuation included a GP's decision to stop and a motivated patient. Regular reviews by the pharmacist could also facilitate the discontinuation process. (4) Optimizing pharmacists' role' with a strong need for GP collaboration, and acknowledging a need to optimize knowledge and skills to support antidepressant discontinuation.

Conclusion: Our study reveals that pharmacists viewed GPs as pivotal in the discontinuation process, as they make the decisions, while they see their role as supportive, following the doctor's decision. However, they faced significant barriers to discontinuing long-term antidepressants, including fear of relapse, societal taboo, and unclear responsibilities. More education, confidence building, and better collaboration with GPs could empower pharmacists to play a proactive role, improving the antidepressant discontinuation process.

缺失的环节?药剂师对长期抗抑郁药物停药的看法:一项定性研究。
背景:长期使用抗抑郁药物是普遍的,尽管指南建议有限的持续时间。全科医生(gp)在审查和停用抗抑郁药方面发挥着核心作用,尽管他们对发起关于长期使用的讨论犹豫不决。药剂师在这一过程中的潜在作用尚未得到充分探索,尽管他们的药学专业知识和可及性。目的:探讨社区药剂师对长期使用抗抑郁药的停药的看法,以及他们参与这一过程的障碍和促进因素。设计:定性研究。方法:对14名比利时社区药师进行半结构化访谈,直至数据饱和。采访被记录、转录并进行主题分析。结果:出现了四个主题。(1)“抗抑郁药在药店:一个持久的禁忌”显示了药剂师们由于社会的耻辱和害怕被认为是爱管闲事而对开始停药的讨论犹豫不决。(2)“平衡风险与收益”强调,药剂师主要关注稳定患者的复发,但也认识到,出现副作用的患者提出的患者要求可能会促进停药。(3)“这是我的角色吗?”,“药剂师将全科医生视为停药的主要决策者,限制了他们支持全科医生治疗决策的作用。中止治疗的关键促进因素包括全科医生决定停止治疗和患者的积极性。药剂师的定期审查也可以促进停药过程。(4)优化药剂师的角色,强烈需要全科医生的合作,并承认需要优化知识和技能,以支持抗抑郁药的停药。结论:我们的研究表明,药剂师认为全科医生在停药过程中是关键的,因为他们做出了决定,而他们认为他们的角色是支持医生的决定。然而,他们在停用长期抗抑郁药物时面临着巨大的障碍,包括害怕复发、社会禁忌和不明确的责任。更多的教育、建立信心以及与全科医生更好的合作可以使药剂师发挥积极主动的作用,改善抗抑郁药停药过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
35
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies across all areas of psychopharmacology. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in psychopharmacology, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信