Outcomes of Adding Inferior Extensor Retinaculum Reinforcement to Arthroscopic Anterior Talofibular Ligament Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 2.2
Foot & ankle international Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-24 DOI:10.1177/10711007251329339
Benjamin Murray, Ali Ghasemi, Ramiz Memon, Clark Yin, James Raphael, Gene Shaffer
{"title":"Outcomes of Adding Inferior Extensor Retinaculum Reinforcement to Arthroscopic Anterior Talofibular Ligament Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Benjamin Murray, Ali Ghasemi, Ramiz Memon, Clark Yin, James Raphael, Gene Shaffer","doi":"10.1177/10711007251329339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Arthroscopic anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) repair procedures generally involve either repair solely of the ATFL or repair of the ATFL with inferior extensor retinaculum (IER) reinforcement. Both techniques produce strong clinical outcomes; however, studies directly comparing ATFL repair techniques with and without IER reinforcement are limited. We hypothesize that patients receiving arthroscopic ATFL repair with IER reinforcement have superior clinical outcome scores.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis per PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines was conducted. To assess the relationship of type of surgical procedure (repair of only the ATFL or repair of the ATFL plus IER reinforcement) to reported clinical outcomes based on the Karlsson and Peterson Scoring System for Ankle Function (KAFS), visual analog scale (VAS), and the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, we used the standardized mean difference (SMD) with a 95% CI of preoperative to postoperative scores as an effect size. A meta-regression analysis was conducted to identify the source of differences in the observed effect size between studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 638 studies met the initial search criteria. The meta-analysis included 34 studies to compare clinical outcomes of arthroscopic ATFL repair. Arthroscopic ATFL repair both with and without IER reinforcement resulted in significantly improved preoperative to postoperative clinical outcome scores. Arthroscopic ATFL repair with IER reinforcement resulted in a significantly higher preoperative to postoperative SMD for KAFS (<i>P</i> = .091) and VAS (<i>P</i> = .065) scores compared to arthroscopic ATFL repair without IER reinforcement. There was no significant difference in the preoperative to postoperative SMD of AOFAS (<i>P</i> = .453) scores when comparing surgical procedures. ATFL repair with IER reinforcement had a significantly greater rate of superficial peroneal nerve (SPN) injury (<i>P</i> = .004).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Arthroscopic ATFL repair with IER reinforcement leads to improved clinical outcome scores but carries a higher risk of SPN injury compared to arthroscopic ATFL repair without IER reinforcement. Patients receiving either arthroscopic procedure should achieve excellent functional outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94011,"journal":{"name":"Foot & ankle international","volume":" ","pages":"794-805"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot & ankle international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10711007251329339","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Arthroscopic anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) repair procedures generally involve either repair solely of the ATFL or repair of the ATFL with inferior extensor retinaculum (IER) reinforcement. Both techniques produce strong clinical outcomes; however, studies directly comparing ATFL repair techniques with and without IER reinforcement are limited. We hypothesize that patients receiving arthroscopic ATFL repair with IER reinforcement have superior clinical outcome scores.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis per PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines was conducted. To assess the relationship of type of surgical procedure (repair of only the ATFL or repair of the ATFL plus IER reinforcement) to reported clinical outcomes based on the Karlsson and Peterson Scoring System for Ankle Function (KAFS), visual analog scale (VAS), and the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, we used the standardized mean difference (SMD) with a 95% CI of preoperative to postoperative scores as an effect size. A meta-regression analysis was conducted to identify the source of differences in the observed effect size between studies.

Results: A total of 638 studies met the initial search criteria. The meta-analysis included 34 studies to compare clinical outcomes of arthroscopic ATFL repair. Arthroscopic ATFL repair both with and without IER reinforcement resulted in significantly improved preoperative to postoperative clinical outcome scores. Arthroscopic ATFL repair with IER reinforcement resulted in a significantly higher preoperative to postoperative SMD for KAFS (P = .091) and VAS (P = .065) scores compared to arthroscopic ATFL repair without IER reinforcement. There was no significant difference in the preoperative to postoperative SMD of AOFAS (P = .453) scores when comparing surgical procedures. ATFL repair with IER reinforcement had a significantly greater rate of superficial peroneal nerve (SPN) injury (P = .004).

Conclusion: Arthroscopic ATFL repair with IER reinforcement leads to improved clinical outcome scores but carries a higher risk of SPN injury compared to arthroscopic ATFL repair without IER reinforcement. Patients receiving either arthroscopic procedure should achieve excellent functional outcomes.

关节镜下距腓骨前韧带修复增加下伸肌网膜加固的结果:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:关节镜下距腓骨前韧带(ATFL)修复手术通常包括单纯修复距腓骨前韧带或下伸肌支持带(IER)加固修复距腓骨前韧带。这两种技术都产生了良好的临床效果;然而,直接比较有和没有IER加固的ATFL修复技术的研究是有限的。我们假设接受关节镜下ATFL修复和IER加固的患者有更好的临床结果评分。方法:根据PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目)指南进行系统评价和荟萃分析。基于Karlsson和Peterson踝关节功能评分系统(KAFS)、视觉模拟量表(VAS)和美国矫形足踝学会(AOFAS)评分,为了评估手术类型(仅修复ATFL或修复ATFL加IER加固)与报告的临床结果之间的关系,我们使用术前至术后评分95% CI的标准化平均差(SMD)作为效应量。进行meta回归分析以确定研究之间观察到的效应大小差异的来源。结果:共有638项研究符合初始检索标准。荟萃分析包括34项研究,比较关节镜下ATFL修复的临床结果。关节镜下ATFL修复伴或不伴IER加固均可显著改善术前和术后临床结果评分。与未进行IER加固的关节镜下ATFL修复相比,经IER加固的关节镜下ATFL修复导致KAFS的术前至术后SMD (P = 0.091)和VAS (P = 0.065)评分明显更高。在比较手术方式时,AOFAS术前与术后SMD评分无显著差异(P = 0.453)。IER加固ATFL修复后腓浅神经(SPN)损伤率显著高于前者(P = 0.004)。结论:关节镜下带IER加固的ATFL修复可改善临床结果评分,但与不带IER加固的ATFL修复相比,其SPN损伤的风险更高。接受关节镜手术的患者应获得良好的功能预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信