Artificial intelligence model for the assessment of unstained live sperm morphology.

IF 2.8 Q2 REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY
Reproduction & fertility Pub Date : 2025-05-02 Print Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1530/RAF-25-0014
Jermphiphut Jaruenpunyasak, Prawai Maneelert, Marwan Nawae, Chainarong Choksuchat
{"title":"Artificial intelligence model for the assessment of unstained live sperm morphology.","authors":"Jermphiphut Jaruenpunyasak, Prawai Maneelert, Marwan Nawae, Chainarong Choksuchat","doi":"10.1530/RAF-25-0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Traditional sperm morphology assessment requires staining and high magnification (100×), rendering sperm unsuitable for further use. We aimed to determine whether an in-house artificial intelligence (AI) model could reliably assess normal sperm morphology in living sperm and compare its performance with that of computer-aided semen analysis and conventional semen analysis methods. In this experimental study, we enrolled 30 healthy male volunteers aged 18-40 years at the Songklanagarind Assisted Reproductive Centre, Songklanagarind Hospital. We developed a novel dataset of sperm morphological images captured with confocal laser scanning microscopy at low magnification and high resolution to train and validate an AI model. Semen samples were divided into three aliquots and assessed for unstained live sperm morphology using the AI model, whereas computer-aided and conventional semen analysis methods evaluated fixed sperm morphology. The performance of our in-house AI model for evaluating unstained live sperm morphology was compared with that of the other two methods. The in-house AI model showed the strongest correlation with computer-aided semen analysis (r = 0.88), followed by conventional semen analysis (r = 0.76). The correlation between computer-aided semen analysis and conventional semen analysis was weaker (r = 0.57). Both the in-house AI and conventional semen analysis methods detected normal sperm morphology at significantly higher rates than computer-aided semen analysis. The in-house AI model could enhance assisted reproductive technology outcomes by improving the selection of high-quality sperm with normal morphology. This could lead to better outcomes of intracytoplasmic sperm injections and other fertility treatments.</p><p><strong>Lay summary: </strong>We evaluated a new in-house AI model for assessing the shape and size (morphology) of live sperm without staining and performed comparisons with computer-aided semen analysis and conventional semen analysis, which require sperm to be fixed and stained before analysis. This new method of assessing unstained, live sperm is significant because it facilitates viable sperm selection for use in assisted reproductive technology immediately after assessment, ultimately contributing to improved fertility outcomes. The AI model allowed sperm morphology assessments with significantly improved accuracy and reliability. By using high-resolution images and advanced microscopy, the AI model could detect subcellular features. This AI model could be an effective tool in clinical settings, because it minimizes subjectivity and improves sperm selection for assisted reproductive technologies, potentially leading to higher success rates in infertility treatments. Further research can refine the model and validate its effectiveness in diverse clinical environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":101312,"journal":{"name":"Reproduction & fertility","volume":"6 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12060770/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproduction & fertility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1530/RAF-25-0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Traditional sperm morphology assessment requires staining and high magnification (100×), rendering sperm unsuitable for further use. We aimed to determine whether an in-house artificial intelligence (AI) model could reliably assess normal sperm morphology in living sperm and compare its performance with that of computer-aided semen analysis and conventional semen analysis methods. In this experimental study, we enrolled 30 healthy male volunteers aged 18-40 years at the Songklanagarind Assisted Reproductive Centre, Songklanagarind Hospital. We developed a novel dataset of sperm morphological images captured with confocal laser scanning microscopy at low magnification and high resolution to train and validate an AI model. Semen samples were divided into three aliquots and assessed for unstained live sperm morphology using the AI model, whereas computer-aided and conventional semen analysis methods evaluated fixed sperm morphology. The performance of our in-house AI model for evaluating unstained live sperm morphology was compared with that of the other two methods. The in-house AI model showed the strongest correlation with computer-aided semen analysis (r = 0.88), followed by conventional semen analysis (r = 0.76). The correlation between computer-aided semen analysis and conventional semen analysis was weaker (r = 0.57). Both the in-house AI and conventional semen analysis methods detected normal sperm morphology at significantly higher rates than computer-aided semen analysis. The in-house AI model could enhance assisted reproductive technology outcomes by improving the selection of high-quality sperm with normal morphology. This could lead to better outcomes of intracytoplasmic sperm injections and other fertility treatments.

Lay summary: We evaluated a new in-house AI model for assessing the shape and size (morphology) of live sperm without staining and performed comparisons with computer-aided semen analysis and conventional semen analysis, which require sperm to be fixed and stained before analysis. This new method of assessing unstained, live sperm is significant because it facilitates viable sperm selection for use in assisted reproductive technology immediately after assessment, ultimately contributing to improved fertility outcomes. The AI model allowed sperm morphology assessments with significantly improved accuracy and reliability. By using high-resolution images and advanced microscopy, the AI model could detect subcellular features. This AI model could be an effective tool in clinical settings, because it minimizes subjectivity and improves sperm selection for assisted reproductive technologies, potentially leading to higher success rates in infertility treatments. Further research can refine the model and validate its effectiveness in diverse clinical environments.

未染色活精子形态评估的人工智能模型。
摘要:传统的精子形态评估需要染色和高倍放大(100倍),使得精子不适合进一步使用。我们的目的是确定内部人工智能(AI)模型是否能够可靠地评估活精子中的正常精子形态,并将其性能与计算机辅助精液分析和传统精液分析方法进行比较。在这项实验研究中,我们在Songklanagarind医院辅助生殖中心招募了30名年龄在18-40岁的健康男性志愿者。我们开发了一个新的精子形态图像数据集,这些图像是用低放大倍率和高分辨率的共聚焦激光扫描显微镜捕获的,用于训练和验证人工智能模型。将精液样本分成三份,使用人工智能模型评估未染色的活精子形态,而计算机辅助和传统精液分析方法评估固定精子形态。将我们的人工智能模型用于评估未染色活精子形态的性能与其他两种方法进行了比较。内部人工智能模型与计算机辅助精液分析的相关性最强(r = 0.88),其次是常规精液分析(r = 0.76)。计算机辅助精液分析与常规精液分析的相关性较弱(r = 0.57)。与计算机辅助精液分析相比,内部人工智能和传统精液分析方法检测正常精子形态的比率都要高得多。内部人工智能模型可以通过改进对高质量精子的选择来提高辅助生殖技术的效果。这可能会导致胞浆内单精子注射和其他生育治疗的更好结果。摘要:我们评估了一种新的内部人工智能模型,用于在不染色的情况下评估活精子的形状和大小(形态),并与计算机辅助精液分析和传统精液分析进行了比较,传统精液分析需要在分析前固定并染色精子。这种评估未染色活精子的新方法意义重大,因为它有助于在评估后立即选择可行的精子用于辅助生殖技术,最终有助于提高生育结果。人工智能模型可以显著提高精子形态评估的准确性和可靠性。通过使用高分辨率图像和先进的显微镜,人工智能模型可以检测亚细胞特征。这种人工智能模型可能是临床环境中的有效工具,因为它最大限度地减少了主观性,并改善了辅助生殖技术的精子选择,有可能提高不孕症治疗的成功率。进一步的研究可以完善模型并验证其在不同临床环境中的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信