The Effects of Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Incision Site Local Anesthetic Infiltration on Stress Hormone Response in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Randomized Controlled Study.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Murat Sahin, Cinar A Surhan, Altinay Mustafa, Cetiner Ilay, Uyanikoglu Ozge, Omeroglu Sinan
{"title":"The Effects of Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Incision Site Local Anesthetic Infiltration on Stress Hormone Response in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Randomized Controlled Study.","authors":"Murat Sahin, Cinar A Surhan, Altinay Mustafa, Cetiner Ilay, Uyanikoglu Ozge, Omeroglu Sinan","doi":"10.1097/SLE.0000000000001373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>After laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery, an increase in stress hormones and moderate-to-severe pain occur in the postoperative period. The aim is to compare the effects of unilateral erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and port site local anesthetic (LA) infiltration methods on stress hormone response and postoperative pain in laparoscopic cholecystectomy operations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a prospective, randomized controlled, single-blind trial that divided laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients into 3 groups. In group I, local anesthetic infiltration was administered at 4 trocar sites; group E underwent unilateral ESPB guided by ultrasound; and group C was the control group with no intervention. Stress hormones were measured preoperatively and postoperatively, and postoperative VAS scores were recorded. The primary outcome was to compare the effects of LA infiltration and ESPB on stress hormone response, while the secondary outcome was the efficacy of postoperative analgesia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 90 patients were included in the study. The duration of analgesia was significantly longer in group I compared with group C (P<0.05). Postoperative VAS scores were significantly lower in group E and group I than in group C (P<0.05). Group E significantly suppressed prolactin levels compared with the other 2 groups (P<0.05). In addition, group E significantly reduced glucose levels compared with group C (P<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Unilateral ESPB and infiltration have similar effects on pain and stress hormones after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Infiltration may be preferred due to its easier application.</p>","PeriodicalId":22092,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000001373","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: After laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery, an increase in stress hormones and moderate-to-severe pain occur in the postoperative period. The aim is to compare the effects of unilateral erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and port site local anesthetic (LA) infiltration methods on stress hormone response and postoperative pain in laparoscopic cholecystectomy operations.

Methods: This study was a prospective, randomized controlled, single-blind trial that divided laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients into 3 groups. In group I, local anesthetic infiltration was administered at 4 trocar sites; group E underwent unilateral ESPB guided by ultrasound; and group C was the control group with no intervention. Stress hormones were measured preoperatively and postoperatively, and postoperative VAS scores were recorded. The primary outcome was to compare the effects of LA infiltration and ESPB on stress hormone response, while the secondary outcome was the efficacy of postoperative analgesia.

Results: A total of 90 patients were included in the study. The duration of analgesia was significantly longer in group I compared with group C (P<0.05). Postoperative VAS scores were significantly lower in group E and group I than in group C (P<0.05). Group E significantly suppressed prolactin levels compared with the other 2 groups (P<0.05). In addition, group E significantly reduced glucose levels compared with group C (P<0.05).

Conclusion: Unilateral ESPB and infiltration have similar effects on pain and stress hormones after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Infiltration may be preferred due to its easier application.

竖脊肌平面阻滞与切口局部麻醉浸润对腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者应激激素反应的影响:随机对照研究。
背景:腹腔镜胆囊切除术后,应激激素升高,术后出现中度至重度疼痛。目的是比较单侧竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESPB)和port site局麻(LA)浸润方式对腹腔镜胆囊切除术应激激素反应和术后疼痛的影响。方法:本研究为前瞻性、随机对照、单盲试验,将腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者分为3组。第一组在4个套管针部位行局麻浸润;E组行超声引导下单侧ESPB;C组为对照组,不进行干预。术前、术后测量应激激素,记录术后VAS评分。主要结局是比较LA浸润和ESPB对应激激素反应的影响,次要结局是术后镇痛的效果。结果:共纳入90例患者。结论:单侧ESPB和浸润对腹腔镜胆囊切除术后疼痛和应激激素的影响相似。由于渗透法更容易应用,因此首选渗透法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
103
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques is a primary source for peer-reviewed, original articles on the newest techniques and applications in operative laparoscopy and endoscopy. Its Editorial Board includes many of the surgeons who pioneered the use of these revolutionary techniques. The journal provides complete, timely, accurate, practical coverage of laparoscopic and endoscopic techniques and procedures; current clinical and basic science research; preoperative and postoperative patient management; complications in laparoscopic and endoscopic surgery; and new developments in instrumentation and technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信