Introducing an on-site Helicopter Emergency Medical Service (HEMS) physician at the Emergency Medical Communication Centre - implications for dispatch precision at a Norwegian HEMS base.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Ole Erik Ulvin, Oddvar Uleberg, Andreas Asheim, Helge Haugland
{"title":"Introducing an on-site Helicopter Emergency Medical Service (HEMS) physician at the Emergency Medical Communication Centre - implications for dispatch precision at a Norwegian HEMS base.","authors":"Ole Erik Ulvin, Oddvar Uleberg, Andreas Asheim, Helge Haugland","doi":"10.1186/s13049-025-01396-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dispatch precision of Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS) is a key topic in prehospital research. In Norway, the combined role of the HEMS physician on-call and the Emergency Medical Communication Centre (EMCC) physician has been challenged. This study aimed to evaluate the impact on HEMS dispatch precision by transferring the medical decision-making from an on-call HEMS physician to an on-site HEMS physician in the EMCC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this quasi-experimental study, a HEMS physician was on-site in Trondheim EMCC during defined working hours from February 1st through July 5th, 2024. When on-site, the decision to dispatch Trondheim HEMS was made by this EMCC physician. Primary outcome was unnecessary HEMS dispatches, i.e. missions where neither advanced treatment nor logistical contributions were provided following HEMS dispatch. Secondary outcomes were HEMS alarm and activation time, rejected HEMS missions and National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA)-scores of encountered HEMS patients. Outcomes were analysed by difference-in-differences analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>785 HEMS missions were included in the analyses. There was no significant difference in the risk of an unnecessary mission (percentage point risk difference [RD] 5.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] -7.4-18.6) or the proportion of patients with NACA scores of 4 or higher (RD -5.8, 95% CI -17.9-6.3) following the intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found no evidence of increased HEMS dispatch precision, measured by the proportion of missions without medical or logistical contributions, when transferring the medical decision regarding HEMS dispatch from the HEMS physician on-call to an on-site EMCC physician in this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":49292,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation & Emergency Medicine","volume":"33 1","pages":"80"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12057114/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation & Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-025-01396-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Dispatch precision of Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS) is a key topic in prehospital research. In Norway, the combined role of the HEMS physician on-call and the Emergency Medical Communication Centre (EMCC) physician has been challenged. This study aimed to evaluate the impact on HEMS dispatch precision by transferring the medical decision-making from an on-call HEMS physician to an on-site HEMS physician in the EMCC.

Methods: In this quasi-experimental study, a HEMS physician was on-site in Trondheim EMCC during defined working hours from February 1st through July 5th, 2024. When on-site, the decision to dispatch Trondheim HEMS was made by this EMCC physician. Primary outcome was unnecessary HEMS dispatches, i.e. missions where neither advanced treatment nor logistical contributions were provided following HEMS dispatch. Secondary outcomes were HEMS alarm and activation time, rejected HEMS missions and National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA)-scores of encountered HEMS patients. Outcomes were analysed by difference-in-differences analyses.

Results: 785 HEMS missions were included in the analyses. There was no significant difference in the risk of an unnecessary mission (percentage point risk difference [RD] 5.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] -7.4-18.6) or the proportion of patients with NACA scores of 4 or higher (RD -5.8, 95% CI -17.9-6.3) following the intervention.

Conclusion: We found no evidence of increased HEMS dispatch precision, measured by the proportion of missions without medical or logistical contributions, when transferring the medical decision regarding HEMS dispatch from the HEMS physician on-call to an on-site EMCC physician in this study.

在紧急医疗通信中心引入现场直升机紧急医疗服务(HEMS)医生——对挪威HEMS基地调度精度的影响。
背景:直升机紧急医疗服务(HEMS)调度精度是院前研究的关键问题。在挪威,卫生紧急医疗服务的随叫随到医生和紧急医疗通讯中心(EMCC)医生的综合作用受到了挑战。本研究旨在评估EMCC将医疗决策从随叫随到的HEMS医生转移到现场的HEMS医生对HEMS调度精度的影响。方法:在这项准实验研究中,一名HEMS医生在2024年2月1日至7月5日的规定工作时间内在特隆赫姆EMCC现场工作。当现场时,派遣特隆赫姆医疗急救系统的决定是由EMCC医生做出的。主要结果是不必要的HEMS派遣,即在HEMS派遣后既没有提供先进治疗也没有提供后勤捐助的特派团。次要结果是HEMS警报和激活时间,拒绝的HEMS任务和国家航空咨询委员会(NACA)-遇到的HEMS患者的分数。结果采用差异中差异分析。结果:785个医疗急救任务被纳入分析。干预后,不必要手术的风险(百分比风险差[RD] 5.6, 95%可信区间[CI] -7.4-18.6)或NACA评分为4分或更高的患者比例(RD -5.8, 95% CI -17.9-6.3)无显著差异。结论:在本研究中,当将关于HEMS调度的医疗决策从HEMS值班医生转移到现场EMCC医生时,我们没有发现证据表明HEMS调度精度提高,通过没有医疗或后勤贡献的任务比例来衡量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The primary topics of interest in Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine (SJTREM) are the pre-hospital and early in-hospital diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of emergency medicine, trauma, and resuscitation. Contributions focusing on dispatch, major incidents, etiology, pathophysiology, rehabilitation, epidemiology, prevention, education, training, implementation, work environment, as well as ethical and socio-economic aspects may also be assessed for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信