The Silent Saboteur: Teaching the Clinical Implications of Occult Hypoxemia & Social Determinants of Health via a Pulmonary Embolism Case.

Journal of education & teaching in emergency medicine Pub Date : 2025-04-30 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.21980/J8FD14
Eugene Marrone, John Cafaro, Jared Klein
{"title":"The Silent Saboteur: Teaching the Clinical Implications of Occult Hypoxemia & Social Determinants of Health via a Pulmonary Embolism Case.","authors":"Eugene Marrone, John Cafaro, Jared Klein","doi":"10.21980/J8FD14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Audience: </strong>Medical students on required fourth-year emergency medicine clerkship.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Social determinants of health are the nonmedical factors that influence health outcomes.1 As part of the AMA Accelerating Change in Medical Education Consortium's third pillar of medical education, health systems science, social determinants of health are recognized as critical components to medical student education.2 The push for institutions to address health inequities has led medical schools to emphasize social determinants of health.3 Medical students have stepped up to advocate for change and are demanding concrete action, including the development of antiracist curriculum and learning environments.4 The current and next generations of physicians need to be prepared to be responsive to the public health and societal needs of everyone.5 Emergency departments are a window into a community and its challenges, reflecting the most critical social determinants of health (SDH) of the population they serve; as such, they are the ideal setting in which to learn about SDH.6 Core emergency medicine (EM) clerkships typically focus on disease management for the acutely ill and injured, with limited emphasis on the holistic care that addresses a patient's SDH-a missed educational opportunity.7 We present an oral (or white) board case that highlights the basic approach to pulmonary embolism while emphasizing consideration of both social determinants of health and racial considerations.</p><p><strong>Educational objectives: </strong>By the end of this oral board case, learners will be able to: 1) obtain appropriate history of present illness (HPI) and physical exam elements for the undifferentiated chest pain patient, 2) identify elements of history and physical exam that are compatible with pulmonary embolism, 3) formulate a differential diagnosis for chest pain and perform the appropriate work-up to narrow this differential diagnosis, 4) appropriately manage pulmonary embolism, 5) review and discuss the diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) elements of the case, and 6) review and discuss the importance of social determinants of health (SDH) in disposition decisions and patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Educational methods: </strong>This case is meant to be used as an oral board or white board case for medical students and interns.</p><p><strong>Research methods: </strong>Educational content was assessed via three questions related to occult hypoxemia and Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) reporting by race at the end of clerkship exam. The results of learners who were present for the case were compared to those who were not present. Results were stratified to compare whether the student was applying for an Emergency Medicine residency or another specialty.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 72 students completed the end of clerkship exam, with three questions related to diversity, equity, and inclusion. Data was sorted both by questions and whether the student planned to apply for an Emergency Medicine residency. The total percent correct was 54.63%. The total percent correct for students present for the oral boards case was 54.69% while that of students who were not present for the case was 54.17% (p=0.96). When looking at students applying for emergency medicine, the total percent correct was 61.90% compared to 47.75% correct for students who were not applying for an Emergency Medicine residency (p=0.037).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This case demonstrates an original way to teach core emergency medicine content and meet AAMC Diversity, Equity, Inclusion competencies. The case not only provides a realistic example of downstream effects of racial disparities and not addressing a patient's social determinants of health, but effectively illustrates how to integrate knowledge of inequity into patient care.</p><p><strong>Topics: </strong>Undifferentiated chest pain, pulmonary embolism, PERC Score, Well's Score, occult hypoxemia, racial bias in reporting glomerular filtration rate (GFR), social determinants of health, diversity, equity, inclusion (DEI).</p>","PeriodicalId":73721,"journal":{"name":"Journal of education & teaching in emergency medicine","volume":"10 2","pages":"O1-O29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12054072/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of education & teaching in emergency medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21980/J8FD14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Audience: Medical students on required fourth-year emergency medicine clerkship.

Introduction: Social determinants of health are the nonmedical factors that influence health outcomes.1 As part of the AMA Accelerating Change in Medical Education Consortium's third pillar of medical education, health systems science, social determinants of health are recognized as critical components to medical student education.2 The push for institutions to address health inequities has led medical schools to emphasize social determinants of health.3 Medical students have stepped up to advocate for change and are demanding concrete action, including the development of antiracist curriculum and learning environments.4 The current and next generations of physicians need to be prepared to be responsive to the public health and societal needs of everyone.5 Emergency departments are a window into a community and its challenges, reflecting the most critical social determinants of health (SDH) of the population they serve; as such, they are the ideal setting in which to learn about SDH.6 Core emergency medicine (EM) clerkships typically focus on disease management for the acutely ill and injured, with limited emphasis on the holistic care that addresses a patient's SDH-a missed educational opportunity.7 We present an oral (or white) board case that highlights the basic approach to pulmonary embolism while emphasizing consideration of both social determinants of health and racial considerations.

Educational objectives: By the end of this oral board case, learners will be able to: 1) obtain appropriate history of present illness (HPI) and physical exam elements for the undifferentiated chest pain patient, 2) identify elements of history and physical exam that are compatible with pulmonary embolism, 3) formulate a differential diagnosis for chest pain and perform the appropriate work-up to narrow this differential diagnosis, 4) appropriately manage pulmonary embolism, 5) review and discuss the diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) elements of the case, and 6) review and discuss the importance of social determinants of health (SDH) in disposition decisions and patient outcomes.

Educational methods: This case is meant to be used as an oral board or white board case for medical students and interns.

Research methods: Educational content was assessed via three questions related to occult hypoxemia and Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) reporting by race at the end of clerkship exam. The results of learners who were present for the case were compared to those who were not present. Results were stratified to compare whether the student was applying for an Emergency Medicine residency or another specialty.

Results: A total of 72 students completed the end of clerkship exam, with three questions related to diversity, equity, and inclusion. Data was sorted both by questions and whether the student planned to apply for an Emergency Medicine residency. The total percent correct was 54.63%. The total percent correct for students present for the oral boards case was 54.69% while that of students who were not present for the case was 54.17% (p=0.96). When looking at students applying for emergency medicine, the total percent correct was 61.90% compared to 47.75% correct for students who were not applying for an Emergency Medicine residency (p=0.037).

Discussion: This case demonstrates an original way to teach core emergency medicine content and meet AAMC Diversity, Equity, Inclusion competencies. The case not only provides a realistic example of downstream effects of racial disparities and not addressing a patient's social determinants of health, but effectively illustrates how to integrate knowledge of inequity into patient care.

Topics: Undifferentiated chest pain, pulmonary embolism, PERC Score, Well's Score, occult hypoxemia, racial bias in reporting glomerular filtration rate (GFR), social determinants of health, diversity, equity, inclusion (DEI).

沉默的破坏者:通过一个肺栓塞病例教授隐性低氧血症的临床意义和健康的社会决定因素。
观众:医学生必修的四年制急诊医学实习。健康的社会决定因素是指影响健康结果的非医学因素作为AMA加速医学教育变革联盟医学教育第三支柱的一部分,健康系统科学,健康的社会决定因素被认为是医学生教育的关键组成部分推动医疗机构解决健康不平等问题的努力促使医学院强调健康的社会决定因素医学生已经加紧倡导变革,并要求采取具体行动,包括制定反种族主义的课程和学习环境当前和下一代的医生需要准备好对每个人的公共卫生和社会需求作出反应急诊科是了解社区及其挑战的窗口,反映了他们所服务人口的最关键的健康社会决定因素;因此,他们是学习sdh的理想场所。核心急诊医学(EM)职员通常侧重于对急病和伤者的疾病管理,对解决患者sdh的整体护理的重视有限——错过了教育机会我们提出一个口头(或白板)案例,强调肺栓塞的基本方法,同时强调考虑健康的社会决定因素和种族因素。教学目标:在这个口语案例结束时,学习者将能够:1)为未分化的胸痛患者获取适当的病史(HPI)和体格检查内容,2)确定与肺栓塞相容的病史和体格检查内容,3)制定胸痛的鉴别诊断并进行适当的检查以缩小这种鉴别诊断,4)适当处理肺栓塞,5)回顾和讨论病例的多样性,公平性和包容性(DEI)因素。6)审查和讨论健康的社会决定因素(SDH)在处置决定和患者结果的重要性。教学方法:本案例适用于医学生和实习生的口头白板或白板案例。研究方法:通过在办考结束时按种族报告隐匿性低氧血症和肾小球滤过率(GFR)的三个问题来评估教育内容。在案例中出现的学习者的结果与没有出现的学习者的结果进行了比较。结果分层比较学生是否申请急诊医学住院医师或其他专业。结果:共有72名学生完成了办事员期末考试,考题涉及多样性、公平性和包容性三个方面。数据根据问题和学生是否计划申请急诊医学住院医师进行分类。总正确率为54.63%。出席口头板案例的学生的总正确率为54.69%,而未出席案例的学生的总正确率为54.17% (p=0.96)。当观察申请急诊医学的学生时,总正确率为61.90%,而未申请急诊医学住院医师的学生正确率为47.75% (p=0.037)。讨论:本案例展示了一种新颖的方法来教授核心急诊医学内容,并满足AAMC的多样性,公平性,包容性能力。这个案例不仅提供了一个现实的例子,说明了种族差异的下游影响,没有解决病人健康的社会决定因素,而且有效地说明了如何将不平等的知识整合到病人护理中。主题:未分化胸痛,肺栓塞,PERC评分,Well's评分,隐性低氧血症,肾小球滤过率(GFR)报告中的种族偏见,健康的社会决定因素,多样性,公平性,包容性(DEI)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信