Telestroke consultant use in acute stroke care: Evidence for best practices from the IMPROVE stroke care program.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Brad J Kolls, Edwin Iversen, Lisa Monk, Shreyansh Shah, Carmelo Graffagnino, Matthew E Ehrlich
{"title":"Telestroke consultant use in acute stroke care: Evidence for best practices from the IMPROVE stroke care program.","authors":"Brad J Kolls, Edwin Iversen, Lisa Monk, Shreyansh Shah, Carmelo Graffagnino, Matthew E Ehrlich","doi":"10.1177/1357633X251332365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundEvolving stroke care demands careful screening of stroke patients to ensure the right care is administered to the right patients in a timely manner. Telestroke has been increasingly utilized to improve access to stroke specialists to make these assessments. Here we explore the care processes at these telestroke site to determine if an optimal care process can be determined.MethodsThis is a post-hoc analysis of data collected as part a larger quality improvement program, the IMPROVE stroke care program. We rank ordered and normalized the DTN times from encounters that used telestroke services to range between 0 and 1. We used linear mixed models to assess the acute stroke care process steps most associated with improvement in thrombolytic administration times.ResultsThe dataset consisted of 21,456 acute stroke code assessments, of which 8356 (80.6%) were conducted via telestroke (TS) services. Of these TS events, 7088 (84.8%) were conducted at sites that used TS for >85% of all events. Compared to private vehicle, EMS arrival is associated with 4% improvement in DTN ranks, though when paired with prehospital notification, DTN ranks significantly improve by 25%. Key process steps associated with shorter DTN times included calling a code stroke quickly upon arrival and notifying the telestroke consultant prior to obtaining the initial CT scan.DiscussionWorking with local EMS to provide prehospital notification along with rapid code stroke activation and consultant notification prior to CT were identified as best practices for providing timely acute stroke care using telestroke providers.</p>","PeriodicalId":50024,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","volume":" ","pages":"1357633X251332365"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X251332365","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundEvolving stroke care demands careful screening of stroke patients to ensure the right care is administered to the right patients in a timely manner. Telestroke has been increasingly utilized to improve access to stroke specialists to make these assessments. Here we explore the care processes at these telestroke site to determine if an optimal care process can be determined.MethodsThis is a post-hoc analysis of data collected as part a larger quality improvement program, the IMPROVE stroke care program. We rank ordered and normalized the DTN times from encounters that used telestroke services to range between 0 and 1. We used linear mixed models to assess the acute stroke care process steps most associated with improvement in thrombolytic administration times.ResultsThe dataset consisted of 21,456 acute stroke code assessments, of which 8356 (80.6%) were conducted via telestroke (TS) services. Of these TS events, 7088 (84.8%) were conducted at sites that used TS for >85% of all events. Compared to private vehicle, EMS arrival is associated with 4% improvement in DTN ranks, though when paired with prehospital notification, DTN ranks significantly improve by 25%. Key process steps associated with shorter DTN times included calling a code stroke quickly upon arrival and notifying the telestroke consultant prior to obtaining the initial CT scan.DiscussionWorking with local EMS to provide prehospital notification along with rapid code stroke activation and consultant notification prior to CT were identified as best practices for providing timely acute stroke care using telestroke providers.

远程卒中顾问在急性卒中护理中的应用:来自改善卒中护理项目的最佳实践证据。
开展脑卒中护理需要对脑卒中患者进行仔细筛查,以确保及时向合适的患者提供正确的护理。远程中风已越来越多地用于改善获得中风专家进行这些评估。在这里,我们探讨在这些中风部位的护理过程,以确定是否可以确定一个最佳的护理过程。方法:这是对一个更大的质量改进项目——改善中风护理项目——所收集数据的事后分析。我们对使用远程中风服务的遭遇的DTN时间进行排序和规范化,使其范围在0到1之间。我们使用线性混合模型来评估急性卒中护理过程中与改善溶栓给药时间最相关的步骤。结果该数据集包括21456次急性卒中代码评估,其中8356次(80.6%)是通过卒中(TS)服务进行的。在这些TS事件中,7088例(84.8%)发生在使用TS的站点,占所有事件的85%。与私家车相比,EMS到达与DTN排名提高4%相关,尽管与院前通知相结合,DTN排名显着提高了25%。与缩短DTN时间相关的关键流程步骤包括在到达时快速调用代码中风,并在获得初始CT扫描之前通知远程中风顾问。与当地EMS合作,提供院前通知,以及快速卒中激活代码和CT前顾问通知,被认为是使用远程卒中提供者及时提供急性卒中护理的最佳做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
174
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare provides excellent peer reviewed coverage of developments in telemedicine and e-health and is now widely recognised as the leading journal in its field. Contributions from around the world provide a unique perspective on how different countries and health systems are using new technology in health care. Sections within the journal include technology updates, editorials, original articles, research tutorials, educational material, review articles and reports from various telemedicine organisations. A subscription to this journal will help you to stay up-to-date in this fast moving and growing area of medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信