EFFECT OF CHEST COMPRESSION RELEASE VELOCITY ON CEREBRAL PERFUSION PRESSURE IN PORCINE CARDIAC ARREST MODEL.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
SHOCK Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-11 DOI:10.1097/SHK.0000000000002604
Sang Hun Kim, Ki Hong Kim, Yoonjic Kim, Yoon Ha Joo, Hyun Jeong Kang, Chae Yeong An, Young Sun Ro, Ki Jeong Hong, Kyoung Jun Song, Sang Do Shin
{"title":"EFFECT OF CHEST COMPRESSION RELEASE VELOCITY ON CEREBRAL PERFUSION PRESSURE IN PORCINE CARDIAC ARREST MODEL.","authors":"Sang Hun Kim, Ki Hong Kim, Yoonjic Kim, Yoon Ha Joo, Hyun Jeong Kang, Chae Yeong An, Young Sun Ro, Ki Jeong Hong, Kyoung Jun Song, Sang Do Shin","doi":"10.1097/SHK.0000000000002604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Objective: High-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation is crucial for the survival of patients experiencing cardiac arrest, but the effect of the chest compression release velocity (CCRV) has not been well studied. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the CCRV on cerebral perfusion pressure (CePP) in an experimental study of porcine cardiac arrest. Methods: A ventricular fibrillation (VF)-induced experimental model of cardiac arrest was established in 16 pigs. The study subjects were randomized into a high-CCRV (400 mm/s) group and a low-CCRV (300 mm/s) group. Six minutes after VF induction, all the study subjects underwent 4 min of chest compression followed by 20 min of advanced cardiovascular life support, including the i.v. administration of epinephrine. Defibrillation was provided after 24 minutes of resuscitation. The primary outcome was CePP, which was calculated as the difference between the MAP and intracranial pressure. The Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to compare two groups in each resuscitation phase, and a linear mixed model was used to analyze the interaction effect of group and resuscitation phase. Results: Each of the eight subjects in the high-CCRV group and low-CCRV group were finally analyzed. The CEPP was highest at 10 to 12 min after VF in the low-CCRV group, with a mean (95% confidence interval) of 14.9 (0.2-29.7) mm Hg, and at 12 to 14 min after VF in the high-CCRV group, with a mean (95% confidence interval) of 18.2 (3.8-32.6) mm Hg. Compared with the low-CCRV group, the high-CCRV group had a greater CePP throughout the entire resuscitation phase, but there was no significant difference in the linear mixed model. Conclusion: In the porcine model of VF-induced cardiac arrest, there was a significant difference in CePP between the low-CCRV and high-CCRV groups. Further investigations should be performed to develop the resuscitation protocol to optimize brain perfusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":21667,"journal":{"name":"SHOCK","volume":" ","pages":"213-217"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SHOCK","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0000000000002604","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: High-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation is crucial for the survival of patients experiencing cardiac arrest, but the effect of the chest compression release velocity (CCRV) has not been well studied. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the CCRV on cerebral perfusion pressure (CePP) in an experimental study of porcine cardiac arrest. Methods: A ventricular fibrillation (VF)-induced experimental model of cardiac arrest was established in 16 pigs. The study subjects were randomized into a high-CCRV (400 mm/s) group and a low-CCRV (300 mm/s) group. Six minutes after VF induction, all the study subjects underwent 4 min of chest compression followed by 20 min of advanced cardiovascular life support, including the i.v. administration of epinephrine. Defibrillation was provided after 24 minutes of resuscitation. The primary outcome was CePP, which was calculated as the difference between the MAP and intracranial pressure. The Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to compare two groups in each resuscitation phase, and a linear mixed model was used to analyze the interaction effect of group and resuscitation phase. Results: Each of the eight subjects in the high-CCRV group and low-CCRV group were finally analyzed. The CEPP was highest at 10 to 12 min after VF in the low-CCRV group, with a mean (95% confidence interval) of 14.9 (0.2-29.7) mm Hg, and at 12 to 14 min after VF in the high-CCRV group, with a mean (95% confidence interval) of 18.2 (3.8-32.6) mm Hg. Compared with the low-CCRV group, the high-CCRV group had a greater CePP throughout the entire resuscitation phase, but there was no significant difference in the linear mixed model. Conclusion: In the porcine model of VF-induced cardiac arrest, there was a significant difference in CePP between the low-CCRV and high-CCRV groups. Further investigations should be performed to develop the resuscitation protocol to optimize brain perfusion.

胸压释放速度对猪心脏骤停模型脑灌注压的影响。
目的:高质量的心肺复苏对心脏骤停患者的生存至关重要,但胸压释放速度(CCRV)的影响尚未得到很好的研究。本研究的目的是评价CCRV对猪心脏骤停脑灌注压(CePP)的影响。方法:建立16头猪心室颤动(VF)致心脏骤停实验模型。研究对象随机分为高ccrv (400 mm/sec)组和低ccrv (300 mm/sec)组。在VF诱导6分钟后,所有研究对象都进行了4分钟的胸部按压,随后进行了20分钟的高级心血管生命支持,包括静脉注射肾上腺素。复苏24分钟后进行除颤。主要观察指标为CePP,以平均动脉压与颅内压之差计算。采用Wilcoxon秩和检验比较两组在各复苏阶段的差异,采用线性混合模型分析组与复苏阶段的交互效应。结果:最终对高ccrv组和低ccrv组8名受试者进行分析。低ccrv组在VF后10 ~ 12分钟的CEPP最高,平均(95% CI)为14.9 (0.2 ~ 29.7)mmHg,高ccrv组在VF后12 ~ 14分钟的CEPP最高,平均(95% CI)为18.2 (3.8 ~ 32.6)mmHg。与低ccrv组相比,高ccrv组在整个复苏阶段的CePP均高于低ccrv组,但线性混合模型差异无统计学意义。结论:在vf诱导的猪心脏骤停模型中,低ccrv组和高ccrv组的CePP有显著差异。需要进一步的研究来制定复苏方案以优化脑灌注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
SHOCK
SHOCK 医学-外科
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
3.20%
发文量
199
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: SHOCK®: Injury, Inflammation, and Sepsis: Laboratory and Clinical Approaches includes studies of novel therapeutic approaches, such as immunomodulation, gene therapy, nutrition, and others. The mission of the Journal is to foster and promote multidisciplinary studies, both experimental and clinical in nature, that critically examine the etiology, mechanisms and novel therapeutics of shock-related pathophysiological conditions. Its purpose is to excel as a vehicle for timely publication in the areas of basic and clinical studies of shock, trauma, sepsis, inflammation, ischemia, and related pathobiological states, with particular emphasis on the biologic mechanisms that determine the response to such injury. Making such information available will ultimately facilitate improved care of the traumatized or septic individual.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信