New chapter in precision medicine: strategies for endoscopic resection of 10-20 mm non-pedunculated colorectal polyps.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2025-05-08 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17562848251338672
Changwei Duan, Zhen Liu, Xin Wang, Mingjie Zhang, Jianqiu Sheng, Yuqi He, Xianzong Ma
{"title":"New chapter in precision medicine: strategies for endoscopic resection of 10-20 mm non-pedunculated colorectal polyps.","authors":"Changwei Duan, Zhen Liu, Xin Wang, Mingjie Zhang, Jianqiu Sheng, Yuqi He, Xianzong Ma","doi":"10.1177/17562848251338672","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The preferred resection methods for 10-20 mm non-pedunculated lesions remain unclear. This review summarizes the current methods and novel technologies for resecting 10-20 mm non-pedunculated colorectal polyps, mainly focusing on hot snare polypectomy, cold snare polypectomy (CSP), endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). The application of novel techniques involving bipolar snares and low-power pure-cut is expected to reduce adverse events (AEs) related to thermal damage, but prospective studies are needed to confirm their reliability. CSP, including conventional CSP and submucosal injection CSP (SI-CSP), maintains resection efficacy with dedicated snares or submucosal injection for regular non-pedunculated polyps and serrated lesions with a low AE rate of 0.0%-3.4%. Modified EMR techniques such as underwater EMR, tip-in EMR, and EMR-circumferential precutting demonstrate a 15.0%-20.0% increase in en bloc resection rates compared with conventional EMR while also reducing AEs. ESD is recommended as the preferred method for medium-sized colorectal lesions with suspected submucosal invasion, fibrosis, particularly when the procedure is technically challenging. In addition, optical diagnosis is essential for pathological assessment and precise resection. Also, postoperative follow-up is needed for high-risk lesions and cases with unsatisfactory resection.</p>","PeriodicalId":48770,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology","volume":"18 ","pages":"17562848251338672"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12062604/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562848251338672","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The preferred resection methods for 10-20 mm non-pedunculated lesions remain unclear. This review summarizes the current methods and novel technologies for resecting 10-20 mm non-pedunculated colorectal polyps, mainly focusing on hot snare polypectomy, cold snare polypectomy (CSP), endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). The application of novel techniques involving bipolar snares and low-power pure-cut is expected to reduce adverse events (AEs) related to thermal damage, but prospective studies are needed to confirm their reliability. CSP, including conventional CSP and submucosal injection CSP (SI-CSP), maintains resection efficacy with dedicated snares or submucosal injection for regular non-pedunculated polyps and serrated lesions with a low AE rate of 0.0%-3.4%. Modified EMR techniques such as underwater EMR, tip-in EMR, and EMR-circumferential precutting demonstrate a 15.0%-20.0% increase in en bloc resection rates compared with conventional EMR while also reducing AEs. ESD is recommended as the preferred method for medium-sized colorectal lesions with suspected submucosal invasion, fibrosis, particularly when the procedure is technically challenging. In addition, optical diagnosis is essential for pathological assessment and precise resection. Also, postoperative follow-up is needed for high-risk lesions and cases with unsatisfactory resection.

精准医学新篇章:内镜下切除10- 20mm无带蒂结肠息肉的策略。
10- 20mm无带梗病变的首选切除方法尚不清楚。本文综述了目前10- 20mm无带蒂结直肠息肉的治疗方法和新技术,主要包括热陷阱息肉切除术、冷陷阱息肉切除术(CSP)、内镜下粘膜切除术(EMR)和内镜下粘膜剥离术(ESD)。包括双极陷阱和低功率纯切割在内的新技术的应用有望减少与热损伤相关的不良事件(ae),但需要前瞻性研究来证实其可靠性。CSP包括常规CSP和粘膜下注射CSP (SI-CSP),对常规无带蒂息肉和锯齿状病变,通过专用陷阱或粘膜下注射保持切除效果,AE率较低,为0.0%-3.4%。改进的EMR技术,如水下EMR、尖端EMR和EMR环向预切割,与传统EMR相比,整体切除率提高了15.0%-20.0%,同时也降低了ae。对于怀疑粘膜下浸润、纤维化的中等大小结直肠病变,特别是在技术上具有挑战性的情况下,ESD被推荐为首选方法。此外,光学诊断是必要的病理评估和精确切除。此外,对于高危病变和切除不理想的病例,需要术后随访。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.40%
发文量
103
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology is an open access journal which delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed original research articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies in the medical treatment of gastrointestinal and hepatic disorders. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at an international audience of clinicians and researchers in gastroenterology and related disciplines, providing an online forum for rapid dissemination of recent research and perspectives in this area. The editors welcome original research articles across all areas of gastroenterology and hepatology. The journal publishes original research articles and review articles primarily. Original research manuscripts may include laboratory, animal or human/clinical studies – all phases. Letters to the Editor and Case Reports will also be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信