Examining disparities in cervical cancer diagnosis at the intersection of disability and sexual orientation

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Disability and Health Journal Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-23 DOI:10.1016/j.dhjo.2025.101838
Amarachukwu F. Orji , Carolyn Drews-Botsch , Rodman Turpin , Gilbert Gimm , Tarang Parekh
{"title":"Examining disparities in cervical cancer diagnosis at the intersection of disability and sexual orientation","authors":"Amarachukwu F. Orji ,&nbsp;Carolyn Drews-Botsch ,&nbsp;Rodman Turpin ,&nbsp;Gilbert Gimm ,&nbsp;Tarang Parekh","doi":"10.1016/j.dhjo.2025.101838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Cervical cancer risk factors are more prevalent among women with disabilities and sexual minorities, yet little is known about how these factors intersect.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To examine differences in cervical cancer diagnosis at the intersection of disability and sexual orientation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using a nationally representative sample (N = 80,447) obtained from 2014 to 2023 National Health Interview Survey data, we conducted logistic regressions to estimate the odds of cervical cancer diagnosis at the intersection of disability and sexual orientation among women (25–65 years). We calculated three measures of interaction: 1) relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI); 2) proportion attributable to interaction (AP); and 3) synergy index (SI).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Heterosexual women with disabilities were more likely to receive a diagnosis of cervical cancer (aOR = 2.15, 95 % CI: 1.75–2.64) compared to heterosexual women without disabilities. This disparity was even greater among women with disabilities who identified as sexual minorities (aOR = 2.98, 95 % CI: 1.86–4.77). The interaction measures suggest a synergistic effect between disability and sexual orientation on cervical cancer risk. Specifically, women with disabilities in multiple functional areas had increased odds of a cervical cancer diagnosis, regardless of sexual orientation (Heterosexual: aOR = 2.94, 95 % CI: 2.33–3.70; Sexual minorities: aOR = 3.04, 95 % CI: 1.25–7.42).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The findings suggest that disability status plays a significant role in exacerbating the risk of cervical cancer, while the combination of disability and minority sexual orientation may further compound adverse experiences that disproportionately contribute to this risk.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49300,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Health Journal","volume":"18 4","pages":"Article 101838"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1936657425000664","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Cervical cancer risk factors are more prevalent among women with disabilities and sexual minorities, yet little is known about how these factors intersect.

Objective

To examine differences in cervical cancer diagnosis at the intersection of disability and sexual orientation.

Methods

Using a nationally representative sample (N = 80,447) obtained from 2014 to 2023 National Health Interview Survey data, we conducted logistic regressions to estimate the odds of cervical cancer diagnosis at the intersection of disability and sexual orientation among women (25–65 years). We calculated three measures of interaction: 1) relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI); 2) proportion attributable to interaction (AP); and 3) synergy index (SI).

Results

Heterosexual women with disabilities were more likely to receive a diagnosis of cervical cancer (aOR = 2.15, 95 % CI: 1.75–2.64) compared to heterosexual women without disabilities. This disparity was even greater among women with disabilities who identified as sexual minorities (aOR = 2.98, 95 % CI: 1.86–4.77). The interaction measures suggest a synergistic effect between disability and sexual orientation on cervical cancer risk. Specifically, women with disabilities in multiple functional areas had increased odds of a cervical cancer diagnosis, regardless of sexual orientation (Heterosexual: aOR = 2.94, 95 % CI: 2.33–3.70; Sexual minorities: aOR = 3.04, 95 % CI: 1.25–7.42).

Conclusion

The findings suggest that disability status plays a significant role in exacerbating the risk of cervical cancer, while the combination of disability and minority sexual orientation may further compound adverse experiences that disproportionately contribute to this risk.
在残疾和性取向的交叉点检查宫颈癌诊断的差异。
背景:宫颈癌的危险因素在残疾妇女和性少数群体中更为普遍,但人们对这些因素如何相互作用知之甚少。目的:探讨残疾与性取向交叉点对宫颈癌诊断的差异。方法:利用2014年至2023年全国健康访谈调查数据中具有全国代表性的样本(N = 80,447),我们进行了logistic回归,以估计25-65岁女性在残疾和性取向交叉点的宫颈癌诊断几率。我们计算了相互作用的三个衡量标准:1)相互作用导致的相对超额风险(rei);2)归因于相互作用的比例(AP);3)协同指数(SI)。结果:与没有残疾的异性恋女性相比,有残疾的异性恋女性更容易被诊断为宫颈癌(aOR = 2.15, 95% CI: 1.75-2.64)。在被认定为性少数群体的残疾女性中,这种差异甚至更大(aOR = 2.98, 95% CI: 1.86-4.77)。相互作用的措施表明,残疾和性取向之间的协同效应对宫颈癌的风险。具体来说,无论性取向如何,多功能区残疾的女性患宫颈癌的几率都有所增加(异性恋:aOR = 2.94, 95% CI: 2.33-3.70;性少数群体:aOR = 3.04, 95% CI: 1.25-7.42)。结论:研究结果表明,残疾状况在加剧子宫颈癌的风险中起着重要作用,而残疾和少数性取向的结合可能进一步加剧不良经历,从而不成比例地增加这一风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Disability and Health Journal
Disability and Health Journal HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
134
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: Disability and Health Journal is a scientific, scholarly, and multidisciplinary journal for reporting original contributions that advance knowledge in disability and health. Topics may be related to global health, quality of life, and specific health conditions as they relate to disability. Such contributions include: • Reports of empirical research on the characteristics of persons with disabilities, environment, health outcomes, and determinants of health • Reports of empirical research on the Systematic or other evidence-based reviews and tightly conceived theoretical interpretations of research literature • Reports of empirical research on the Evaluative research on new interventions, technologies, and programs • Reports of empirical research on the Reports on issues or policies affecting the health and/or quality of life for persons with disabilities, using a scientific base.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书