Chandan Saha, Chase R Figley, Brian Lithgow, Xikui Wang, Paul B Fitzgerald, Lisa Koski, Behzad Mansouri, Zahra Moussavi
{"title":"Using baseline MRI radiomic features to predict the efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in Alzheimer's patients.","authors":"Chandan Saha, Chase R Figley, Brian Lithgow, Xikui Wang, Paul B Fitzgerald, Lisa Koski, Behzad Mansouri, Zahra Moussavi","doi":"10.1007/s11517-025-03366-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) as a treatment for Alzheimer's disease (AD) is uncertain at baseline. Herein, we aimed to investigate whether radiomic features from the pre-treatment MRI data could predict rTMS efficacy for AD treatment. Out of 110 participants with AD in the active (n = 75) and sham (n = 35) rTMS treatment groups having T1-weighted brain MRI data, we had two groups of responders (active = 55 and sham = 24) and non-responders (active = 20 and sham = 11). We extracted histogram-based radiomic features from MRI data using 3D Slicer software; the most important features were selected utilizing a combination of a two-sample t-test, correlation test, least absolute shrinkage, and selection operator. The support vector machine classified rTMS responders and non-responders with a cross-validated mean accuracy/AUC of 81.9%/90.0% in the active group and 87.4%/95.8% in the sham group. Further, the radiomic features of the active group significantly correlated with participants' AD assessment scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog) change after treatment (false discovery rate corrected p < 0.05). Given that baseline radiomic features were able to accurately predict AD patients' responses to rTMS treatment, these radiomic features warrant further investigation for personalizing AD therapeutic strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":49840,"journal":{"name":"Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-025-03366-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) as a treatment for Alzheimer's disease (AD) is uncertain at baseline. Herein, we aimed to investigate whether radiomic features from the pre-treatment MRI data could predict rTMS efficacy for AD treatment. Out of 110 participants with AD in the active (n = 75) and sham (n = 35) rTMS treatment groups having T1-weighted brain MRI data, we had two groups of responders (active = 55 and sham = 24) and non-responders (active = 20 and sham = 11). We extracted histogram-based radiomic features from MRI data using 3D Slicer software; the most important features were selected utilizing a combination of a two-sample t-test, correlation test, least absolute shrinkage, and selection operator. The support vector machine classified rTMS responders and non-responders with a cross-validated mean accuracy/AUC of 81.9%/90.0% in the active group and 87.4%/95.8% in the sham group. Further, the radiomic features of the active group significantly correlated with participants' AD assessment scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog) change after treatment (false discovery rate corrected p < 0.05). Given that baseline radiomic features were able to accurately predict AD patients' responses to rTMS treatment, these radiomic features warrant further investigation for personalizing AD therapeutic strategies.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1963, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing (MBEC) continues to serve the biomedical engineering community, covering the entire spectrum of biomedical and clinical engineering. The journal presents exciting and vital experimental and theoretical developments in biomedical science and technology, and reports on advances in computer-based methodologies in these multidisciplinary subjects. The journal also incorporates new and evolving technologies including cellular engineering and molecular imaging.
MBEC publishes original research articles as well as reviews and technical notes. Its Rapid Communications category focuses on material of immediate value to the readership, while the Controversies section provides a forum to exchange views on selected issues, stimulating a vigorous and informed debate in this exciting and high profile field.
MBEC is an official journal of the International Federation of Medical and Biological Engineering (IFMBE).