Slipping Through the Cracks: Identifying Families At-Risk of Not Engaging with Mental Health Care Within a Specialty Anxiety Clinic.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Megan Brady, Jesslyn Jamison, Michal Weiss, Sophia Young, Danielle R Adams, Dominique G Ruggieri, Emily M Becker-Haimes
{"title":"Slipping Through the Cracks: Identifying Families At-Risk of Not Engaging with Mental Health Care Within a Specialty Anxiety Clinic.","authors":"Megan Brady, Jesslyn Jamison, Michal Weiss, Sophia Young, Danielle R Adams, Dominique G Ruggieri, Emily M Becker-Haimes","doi":"10.1007/s11414-025-09947-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Most youth in need of specialty anxiety treatment services do not receive it. Many families are lost between the time of initial outreach and attending a first therapy appointment. A retrospective administrative database review identified characteristics of families at risk of failing to connect with anxiety specialty services. Data included 563 records (2019-2023) from a specialty pediatric anxiety program embedded within a large community mental health setting. Variables of interest included client characteristics (age, gender, previous mental health diagnosis/history); household characteristics (insurance, parent/caregiver custody, distance from clinic); and a symptom screener. Descriptive statistics characterized documented non-response to appointment offers and failure to attend an initial scheduled appointment. The highest drop off occurred after families expressed initial interest in services; 113 (21%) families were non-responsive to outreach. Logistic regression analyses indicated that having insurance covered services (vs. self-pay) and living closer to the clinic (vs. farther) predicted increased odds of intake appointment scheduling (ps < .01). Clients with insurance covered services (vs. self-pay) also had higher odds of successful appointment attendance (ps < .01). Findings indicate that many families seeking specialty anxiety services for youth \"fall off\" after initial outreach (e.g., leaving a voicemail or completing an online inquiry form to learn about services). The results suggest the potential importance of streamlining initial contacts to make it easier for families to engage and suggest the potential for future work to examine whether strategies like direct intake booking can improve initial engagement rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":49040,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-025-09947-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Most youth in need of specialty anxiety treatment services do not receive it. Many families are lost between the time of initial outreach and attending a first therapy appointment. A retrospective administrative database review identified characteristics of families at risk of failing to connect with anxiety specialty services. Data included 563 records (2019-2023) from a specialty pediatric anxiety program embedded within a large community mental health setting. Variables of interest included client characteristics (age, gender, previous mental health diagnosis/history); household characteristics (insurance, parent/caregiver custody, distance from clinic); and a symptom screener. Descriptive statistics characterized documented non-response to appointment offers and failure to attend an initial scheduled appointment. The highest drop off occurred after families expressed initial interest in services; 113 (21%) families were non-responsive to outreach. Logistic regression analyses indicated that having insurance covered services (vs. self-pay) and living closer to the clinic (vs. farther) predicted increased odds of intake appointment scheduling (ps < .01). Clients with insurance covered services (vs. self-pay) also had higher odds of successful appointment attendance (ps < .01). Findings indicate that many families seeking specialty anxiety services for youth "fall off" after initial outreach (e.g., leaving a voicemail or completing an online inquiry form to learn about services). The results suggest the potential importance of streamlining initial contacts to make it easier for families to engage and suggest the potential for future work to examine whether strategies like direct intake booking can improve initial engagement rates.

从裂缝中溜走:在专业焦虑诊所中识别有不参与精神卫生保健风险的家庭。
大多数需要特殊焦虑治疗服务的年轻人并没有得到这种服务。许多家庭在最初的外联和参加第一次治疗预约之间迷失了方向。一项回顾性的行政数据库审查确定了未能与焦虑专业服务联系的风险家庭的特征。数据包括563条记录(2019-2023年),这些记录来自大型社区精神卫生机构内嵌入的专业儿科焦虑项目。感兴趣的变量包括客户特征(年龄、性别、以前的精神健康诊断/病史);家庭特征(保险、父母/照顾者监护、离诊所的距离);还有一个症状筛选器。描述性统计特征的文件不响应的预约提供和未能参加最初安排的预约。在家庭最初表达对服务的兴趣后,降幅最大;113个(21%)家庭对外展活动没有反应。逻辑回归分析表明,有保险覆盖的服务(与自费相比)和住得离诊所更近(与更远)预测了就诊预约安排的几率(ps)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research
Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
51
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal examines the organization, financing, delivery and outcomes of behavioral health services (i.e., alcohol, drug abuse, and mental disorders), providing practical and empirical contributions to and explaining the implications for the broader behavioral health field. Each issue includes an overview of contemporary concerns and recent developments in behavioral health policy and management through research articles, policy perspectives, commentaries, brief reports, and book reviews. This journal is the official publication of the National Council for Behavioral Health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信