Evaluating Postural Sway in the Elderly Using Inertial Measurement Units: A Study on Center of Mass Measurements via Accelerometers and Gyroscopes.

IF 1.6 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Journal of clinical medicine research Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-11 DOI:10.14740/jocmr6184
Siriphan Kongsawasdi, Pummarirat Bunjan, Molthicha Wongjak, Witchayaphorn Saenmueng, Kittichai Wantanajittikul
{"title":"Evaluating Postural Sway in the Elderly Using Inertial Measurement Units: A Study on Center of Mass Measurements via Accelerometers and Gyroscopes.","authors":"Siriphan Kongsawasdi, Pummarirat Bunjan, Molthicha Wongjak, Witchayaphorn Saenmueng, Kittichai Wantanajittikul","doi":"10.14740/jocmr6184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Assessment of center of mass (COM) changes during static stance control has practical implications in clinical settings, notably among older adults. Recently portable and wearable devices, including accelerometers and gyroscopes, have emerged as a promising alternative to traditional clinical and laboratory assessments. The objectives of the study were to evaluate COM postural sway parameters derived from accelerometer and gyroscope data during static balance tasks with varying bases of support in healthy elderly individuals, and to examine the correlation and agreement between accelerometer-based and gyroscope-based parameters in postural sway assessment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred and fourteen healthy elderly individuals who had not experienced falls within the preceding 6 months and were confirmed to have no risk of falling as determined by the timed up and go test, were included in this study. They were evaluated for postural sway while standing, using the sensor securely with a belt attached to the L5 vertebra. The four-stage balance test, including standing in a double stance (SO), semi-tandem stance (STO), tandem stance (TO), and single-leg stance (SL), was employed to assess each participant's ability to maintain balance under increasingly challenging standing positions on a stable surface.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study demonstrated that COM posture sway increased with a demanding position and a decreasing base of support. Spearman's rho correlation coefficients from the anteroposterior and mediolateral planes exhibited strong correlation (0.75 - 0.9). Moderate reliability was observed for both the accelerometer and gyroscope parameters in both planes (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.5 and 0.75).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Accelerometry and gyroscopes provide objective quantification of balance that have the potential to be utilized in conjunction with clinical tests to effectively evaluate the risk of falling.</p>","PeriodicalId":94329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical medicine research","volume":"17 4","pages":"200-207"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12045777/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical medicine research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14740/jocmr6184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Assessment of center of mass (COM) changes during static stance control has practical implications in clinical settings, notably among older adults. Recently portable and wearable devices, including accelerometers and gyroscopes, have emerged as a promising alternative to traditional clinical and laboratory assessments. The objectives of the study were to evaluate COM postural sway parameters derived from accelerometer and gyroscope data during static balance tasks with varying bases of support in healthy elderly individuals, and to examine the correlation and agreement between accelerometer-based and gyroscope-based parameters in postural sway assessment.

Methods: One hundred and fourteen healthy elderly individuals who had not experienced falls within the preceding 6 months and were confirmed to have no risk of falling as determined by the timed up and go test, were included in this study. They were evaluated for postural sway while standing, using the sensor securely with a belt attached to the L5 vertebra. The four-stage balance test, including standing in a double stance (SO), semi-tandem stance (STO), tandem stance (TO), and single-leg stance (SL), was employed to assess each participant's ability to maintain balance under increasingly challenging standing positions on a stable surface.

Results: The study demonstrated that COM posture sway increased with a demanding position and a decreasing base of support. Spearman's rho correlation coefficients from the anteroposterior and mediolateral planes exhibited strong correlation (0.75 - 0.9). Moderate reliability was observed for both the accelerometer and gyroscope parameters in both planes (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.5 and 0.75).

Conclusions: Accelerometry and gyroscopes provide objective quantification of balance that have the potential to be utilized in conjunction with clinical tests to effectively evaluate the risk of falling.

用惯性测量单元评估老年人体位摇摆:利用加速度计和陀螺仪测量质心的研究。
背景:评估静止姿态控制时的重心(COM)变化在临床环境中具有实际意义,特别是在老年人中。最近,便携式和可穿戴设备,包括加速度计和陀螺仪,已经成为传统临床和实验室评估的一个有前途的替代方案。本研究的目的是评估健康老年人在不同支撑基础的静态平衡任务中由加速度计和陀螺仪数据得出的COM姿势摇摆参数,并检查基于加速度计和陀螺仪的姿势摇摆评估参数之间的相关性和一致性。方法:选取114名健康老年人,在6个月内未发生跌倒,经定时up and go试验确认无跌倒风险。他们在站立时评估姿势摇摆,将传感器与连接在L5椎体上的皮带安全地使用。通过四阶段的平衡测试,包括双站(SO)、半双人站(STO)、双人站(TO)和单腿站(SL),来评估每个参与者在稳定的表面上越来越具有挑战性的站立姿势下保持平衡的能力。结果:研究表明,随着体位要求的增加和支撑基础的减少,COM姿势的摇摆会增加。正位面和中外侧面的Spearman’s rho相关系数表现出较强的相关性(0.75 ~ 0.9)。两个平面上加速度计和陀螺仪参数的可靠性均为中等(类内相关系数分别为0.5和0.75)。结论:加速度计和陀螺仪提供了平衡的客观量化,有可能与临床试验结合使用,有效地评估跌倒的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信