A network analysis of moral distress among clinical internship nursing students: A cross-sectional study.

IF 2.9 1区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
Yang Xiong, Ya-Qian Fu, Zhuo-Heng Li, Yu-Rong Tang, Zi-Yu Liu, Bi-Rong Liu, Zhuo-Er Huang, Qi-Feng Yi
{"title":"A network analysis of moral distress among clinical internship nursing students: A cross-sectional study.","authors":"Yang Xiong, Ya-Qian Fu, Zhuo-Heng Li, Yu-Rong Tang, Zi-Yu Liu, Bi-Rong Liu, Zhuo-Er Huang, Qi-Feng Yi","doi":"10.1177/09697330251331195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundMoral distress is a significant challenge faced by clinical internship nursing students. Most current studies investigate the impact of external factors on nursing students' moral distress. However, there is a lack of in-depth exploration of the interactions between various moral distress items.Research objectiveThis study aims to construct a network structure of moral distress among clinical internship nursing students, while exploring the touchpoints of moral sensitivity and moral resilience on moral distress, to identify potential targets for moral distress intervention.Research designA cross-sectional design utilized acceptable validity scales. Network analysis was conducted using R (Version 4.4.0). Regularized partial correlation was utilized to describe the associations between different nodes in the network. Central nodes were identified through centrality indices.Participants and research contextThe participants in this study are 372 nursing students undergoing clinical internships at a comprehensive teaching hospital in Changsha, China.Ethical considerationsThis study was approved by the hospital ethics committee (Review Number: Express 241098). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.ResultsIn the moral distress network, the connections between MD3 \"I provide life-sustaining treatment per the family's wishes\" and MD4 \"Despite only extending survival, I implement life-saving measures\" are the strongest. MD18 \"Decline in service quality due to poor team communication,\" MD19 \"I ignore situations lacking adequate information for informed consent,\" and MD17 \"I collaborate with colleagues unable to meet the patient's treatment needs\" are the central nodes of the moral distress network. In the relational network, MD19 is a critical connection point linking moral distress with moral sensitivity and moral resilience.ConclusionFuture interventions for moral distress could focus on the strongly related and significant distress (MD3, MD4, MD18, MD19, MD20, and MD17) mentioned in this study, and develop scientific and targeted interventions to reduce clinical internship nursing students' moral distress.</p>","PeriodicalId":49729,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Ethics","volume":" ","pages":"9697330251331195"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330251331195","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundMoral distress is a significant challenge faced by clinical internship nursing students. Most current studies investigate the impact of external factors on nursing students' moral distress. However, there is a lack of in-depth exploration of the interactions between various moral distress items.Research objectiveThis study aims to construct a network structure of moral distress among clinical internship nursing students, while exploring the touchpoints of moral sensitivity and moral resilience on moral distress, to identify potential targets for moral distress intervention.Research designA cross-sectional design utilized acceptable validity scales. Network analysis was conducted using R (Version 4.4.0). Regularized partial correlation was utilized to describe the associations between different nodes in the network. Central nodes were identified through centrality indices.Participants and research contextThe participants in this study are 372 nursing students undergoing clinical internships at a comprehensive teaching hospital in Changsha, China.Ethical considerationsThis study was approved by the hospital ethics committee (Review Number: Express 241098). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.ResultsIn the moral distress network, the connections between MD3 "I provide life-sustaining treatment per the family's wishes" and MD4 "Despite only extending survival, I implement life-saving measures" are the strongest. MD18 "Decline in service quality due to poor team communication," MD19 "I ignore situations lacking adequate information for informed consent," and MD17 "I collaborate with colleagues unable to meet the patient's treatment needs" are the central nodes of the moral distress network. In the relational network, MD19 is a critical connection point linking moral distress with moral sensitivity and moral resilience.ConclusionFuture interventions for moral distress could focus on the strongly related and significant distress (MD3, MD4, MD18, MD19, MD20, and MD17) mentioned in this study, and develop scientific and targeted interventions to reduce clinical internship nursing students' moral distress.

临床实习护生道德困扰的网络分析:横断面研究。
道德困境是临床实习护生面临的重大挑战。目前的研究大多是探讨外部因素对护生道德困扰的影响。然而,对各种道德困扰项目之间的相互作用缺乏深入的探索。研究目的本研究旨在构建临床实习护生道德困扰的网络结构,同时探索道德敏感性和道德弹性对道德困扰的接触点,寻找道德困扰干预的潜在目标。研究设计横断面设计采用可接受效度量表。使用R (Version 4.4.0)进行网络分析。利用正则化偏相关描述网络中不同节点之间的关联。通过中心性指数确定中心节点。研究对象及研究背景本研究的研究对象为中国长沙某综合性教学医院临床实习的372名护生。本研究经医院伦理委员会批准(审查号:Express 241098)。所有参与者均获得书面知情同意。结果在道德困境网络中,MD3“我按照家属的意愿提供维持生命的治疗”和MD4“尽管只是延长生存时间,但我实施挽救生命的措施”之间的联系最强。MD18“团队沟通不良导致服务质量下降”MD19“我忽视了缺乏足够知情同意信息的情况”MD17“我与无法满足患者治疗需求的同事合作”是道德困扰网络的中心节点。在关系网络中,MD19是连接道德痛苦与道德敏感和道德恢复力的关键连接点。结论未来对道德困扰的干预可针对本研究中提到的强相关和显著性困扰(MD3、MD4、MD18、MD19、MD20、MD17),制定科学、有针对性的干预措施,减少临床实习护生的道德困扰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nursing Ethics
Nursing Ethics 医学-护理
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
11.90%
发文量
117
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Ethics takes a practical approach to this complex subject and relates each topic to the working environment. The articles on ethical and legal issues are written in a comprehensible style and official documents are analysed in a user-friendly way. The international Editorial Board ensures the selection of a wide range of high quality articles of global significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信