Someone Like Me? Disability Identity and Representation Perceptions.

IF 3.3 1区 社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Political Behavior Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-28 DOI:10.1007/s11109-024-09969-z
Stefanie Reher, Elizabeth Evans
{"title":"Someone Like Me? Disability Identity and Representation Perceptions.","authors":"Stefanie Reher, Elizabeth Evans","doi":"10.1007/s11109-024-09969-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Studies have shown that citizens from minoritized groups, including women and people of color, tend to feel better represented by politicians who share their identity, often translating into electoral support. Is this also the case for disabled people, one of the largest yet often ignored minority groups in our societies? Analyses of data from a conjoint survey experiment with 6,000 respondents in the UK and US show that disabled people indeed feel better represented by disabled candidates. This representational link does not require a sense of group identity and is only partly explained by perceptions of shared policy preferences. The study also reveals that non-disabled people feel better represented by non-disabled candidates. The findings highlight the relevance of disability as a political identity, bolstering calls for more disabled people in politics, and might help explain the disability gaps in political trust and participation.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11109-024-09969-z.</p>","PeriodicalId":48166,"journal":{"name":"Political Behavior","volume":"47 2","pages":"689-709"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12053203/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-024-09969-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Studies have shown that citizens from minoritized groups, including women and people of color, tend to feel better represented by politicians who share their identity, often translating into electoral support. Is this also the case for disabled people, one of the largest yet often ignored minority groups in our societies? Analyses of data from a conjoint survey experiment with 6,000 respondents in the UK and US show that disabled people indeed feel better represented by disabled candidates. This representational link does not require a sense of group identity and is only partly explained by perceptions of shared policy preferences. The study also reveals that non-disabled people feel better represented by non-disabled candidates. The findings highlight the relevance of disability as a political identity, bolstering calls for more disabled people in politics, and might help explain the disability gaps in political trust and participation.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11109-024-09969-z.

像我这样的人?残疾身份和表征感知。
研究表明,包括女性和有色人种在内的少数群体的公民往往觉得,与他们有共同身份的政客能更好地代表他们,这通常会转化为选举支持。残疾人也是如此吗?他们是我们社会中人数最多却经常被忽视的少数群体之一。对英国和美国6000名受访者的联合调查实验数据的分析表明,残疾人确实觉得残疾人候选人能更好地代表残疾人。这种代表性的联系不需要群体认同感,也只能部分地用共同政策偏好来解释。该研究还显示,非残疾人觉得非残疾人候选人能更好地代表非残疾人。研究结果强调了残疾作为一种政治身份的相关性,支持了更多残疾人参与政治的呼吁,并可能有助于解释残疾人在政治信任和参与方面的差距。补充信息:在线版本包含补充资料,提供地址为10.1007/s11109-024-09969-z。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Political Behavior
Political Behavior POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
5.10%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: Political Behavior publishes original research in the general fields of political behavior, institutions, processes, and policies. Approaches include economic (preference structuring, bargaining), psychological (attitude formation and change, motivations, perceptions), sociological (roles, group, class), or political (decision making, coalitions, influence). Articles focus on the political behavior (conventional or unconventional) of the individual person or small group (microanalysis), or of large organizations that participate in the political process such as parties, interest groups, political action committees, governmental agencies, and mass media (macroanalysis). As an interdisciplinary journal, Political Behavior integrates various approaches across different levels of theoretical abstraction and empirical domain (contextual analysis). Officially cited as: Polit Behav
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信