Development and evaluation of Goal setting and Action Planning (G-AP) training to support person-centred rehabilitation practice.

IF 1.3 Q3 REHABILITATION
Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences Pub Date : 2025-03-31 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fresc.2025.1505188
Lesley Scobbie, Katie Elliott, Sally Boa, Lynn Grayson, Emily Chesnet, Iona Izat, Mark Barber, Rebecca Fisher
{"title":"Development and evaluation of Goal setting and Action Planning (G-AP) training to support person-centred rehabilitation practice.","authors":"Lesley Scobbie, Katie Elliott, Sally Boa, Lynn Grayson, Emily Chesnet, Iona Izat, Mark Barber, Rebecca Fisher","doi":"10.3389/fresc.2025.1505188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stroke survivor's goals reflect their individual priorities and hopes for the future. Person-centred goal setting is recommended in rehabilitation clinical guidelines, but evidence-based training to support its implementation in practice is limited. We aimed to develop, describe and evaluate a new Goal setting and Action Planning (G-AP) rehabilitation training resource to support person-centred goal setting practice in community neuro-rehabilitation settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A clinical-academic team, advisory group and web-design company were convened to co-develop the G-AP training resource. G-AP training was then delivered to multi-disciplinary staff (<i>n</i> = 48) in four community neuro-rehabilitation teams. A mixed methods evaluation utilising a staff questionnaire and focus group discussion was conducted to investigate staff experiences of G-AP training and their early G-AP implementation efforts. Questionnaire data were analysed descriptively; focus group data were analysed using a Framework approach. An integrated conceptual overview of data was developed to illustrate findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A fully online G-AP training resource comprising a training website and two interactive webinars was developed. Following training, 41/48 (85%) staff completed the online questionnaire and 8/48 (17%) participated in the focus group. Nearly all staff rated the training website as excellent (<i>n</i> = 25/40; 62%) or good (<i>n</i> = 14/40; 35%) and the webinars as excellent (<i>n</i> = 26/41; 63%) or good (<i>n</i> = 14/41; 34%). Following training, staff agreed they were knowledgeable about G-AP (37/41; 90%) and had the confidence (35/40; 88%) and skills (35/40; 88%) to use it in practice. Within one month of training, staff described implementing G-AP individually, but transitioning to implementation at a team level required more time to develop new working practices. Team context including staff beliefs about G-AP, leadership support and competing demands impacted (positively and negatively) on staff training engagement, learning experience and implementation efforts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The new G-AP training resource was positively evaluated and supported early G-AP implementation efforts. This study advances our understanding of training evaluation by highlighting the training-context interaction the temporal nature of training effects. A follow up study evaluating longer term G-AP implementation is underway.</p>","PeriodicalId":73102,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences","volume":"6 ","pages":"1505188"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11994713/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2025.1505188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Stroke survivor's goals reflect their individual priorities and hopes for the future. Person-centred goal setting is recommended in rehabilitation clinical guidelines, but evidence-based training to support its implementation in practice is limited. We aimed to develop, describe and evaluate a new Goal setting and Action Planning (G-AP) rehabilitation training resource to support person-centred goal setting practice in community neuro-rehabilitation settings.

Methods: A clinical-academic team, advisory group and web-design company were convened to co-develop the G-AP training resource. G-AP training was then delivered to multi-disciplinary staff (n = 48) in four community neuro-rehabilitation teams. A mixed methods evaluation utilising a staff questionnaire and focus group discussion was conducted to investigate staff experiences of G-AP training and their early G-AP implementation efforts. Questionnaire data were analysed descriptively; focus group data were analysed using a Framework approach. An integrated conceptual overview of data was developed to illustrate findings.

Results: A fully online G-AP training resource comprising a training website and two interactive webinars was developed. Following training, 41/48 (85%) staff completed the online questionnaire and 8/48 (17%) participated in the focus group. Nearly all staff rated the training website as excellent (n = 25/40; 62%) or good (n = 14/40; 35%) and the webinars as excellent (n = 26/41; 63%) or good (n = 14/41; 34%). Following training, staff agreed they were knowledgeable about G-AP (37/41; 90%) and had the confidence (35/40; 88%) and skills (35/40; 88%) to use it in practice. Within one month of training, staff described implementing G-AP individually, but transitioning to implementation at a team level required more time to develop new working practices. Team context including staff beliefs about G-AP, leadership support and competing demands impacted (positively and negatively) on staff training engagement, learning experience and implementation efforts.

Conclusions: The new G-AP training resource was positively evaluated and supported early G-AP implementation efforts. This study advances our understanding of training evaluation by highlighting the training-context interaction the temporal nature of training effects. A follow up study evaluating longer term G-AP implementation is underway.

发展和评估目标设定和行动计划(G-AP)培训,以支持以人为本的康复实践。
背景:中风幸存者的目标反映了他们个人的优先事项和对未来的希望。在康复临床指南中推荐以人为中心的目标设定,但在实践中支持其实施的循证培训有限。我们旨在开发、描述和评估一种新的目标设定和行动计划(G-AP)康复培训资源,以支持社区神经康复环境中以人为本的目标设定实践。方法:召集临床-学术团队、咨询组和网页设计公司共同开发G-AP培训资源。然后将G-AP培训提供给4个社区神经康复小组的多学科工作人员(n = 48)。利用员工问卷和焦点小组讨论进行了一项混合方法评估,以调查员工对G-AP培训的经验及其早期实施G-AP的努力。对问卷数据进行描述性分析;使用框架方法分析焦点小组数据。对数据进行了综合概念性概述,以说明研究结果。结果:开发了一个完全在线的G-AP培训资源,包括一个培训网站和两个交互式网络研讨会。培训结束后,41/48(85%)的员工完成了在线问卷,8/48(17%)的员工参加了焦点小组。几乎所有员工都认为培训网站是优秀的(n = 25/40;62%)或良好(n = 14/40;35%)和优秀的网络研讨会(n = 26/41;63%)或良好(n = 14/41;34%)。培训后,员工一致认为他们了解G-AP (37/41;90%),置信度(35/40;88%)和技能(35/40;88%)在实践中使用它。在一个月的培训中,员工描述了单独实施G-AP,但过渡到团队层面的实施需要更多的时间来开发新的工作实践。团队环境包括员工对G-AP的信念,领导支持和竞争需求对员工培训参与,学习经验和实施努力产生(积极和消极)影响。结论:新的G-AP培训资源得到了积极评价,并支持了G-AP的早期实施工作。本研究通过强调训练-情境的相互作用和训练效果的时间性质,促进了我们对训练评估的理解。一项评估长期G-AP实施情况的后续研究正在进行中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信