Précis of Open and Inclusive: Fair Processes for Financing Universal Health Coverage.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Health Economics Policy and Law Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-07 DOI:10.1017/S1744133124000331
Alex Voorhoeve, Elina Dale, Unni Gopinathan
{"title":"Précis of <i>Open and Inclusive: Fair Processes for Financing Universal Health Coverage</i>.","authors":"Alex Voorhoeve, Elina Dale, Unni Gopinathan","doi":"10.1017/S1744133124000331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We summarise key messages from the World Bank Report <i>Open and Inclusive: Fair Processes for Financing Universal Health Coverage</i>. A central lesson of the Report is that in decision-making on the path to Universal Health Coverage (UHC), procedural fairness matters alongside substantive fairness. Decision systems should be assessed using a complete conception of procedural fairness that embodies core commitments to impartial and equal consideration of interests and perspectives. These commitments demand that comprehensive information is gathered and disclosed and that justifications for policies are publicly debated; that participation in decision-making is enabled; and that these characteristics of the decision system are institutionalised rather than up to the good will of decision-makers. Procedural fairness can improve equity in outcomes, raise legitimacy and trust, and can help make reforms last. While improving procedural fairness can be costly and there are barriers to achieving it, the range of instruments that countries at varying levels of income and institutional capacity have used with some success shows that, in many contexts, advances in procedural fairness in health financing are possible and worthwhile.</p>","PeriodicalId":46836,"journal":{"name":"Health Economics Policy and Law","volume":"20 1","pages":"4-8"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Economics Policy and Law","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744133124000331","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We summarise key messages from the World Bank Report Open and Inclusive: Fair Processes for Financing Universal Health Coverage. A central lesson of the Report is that in decision-making on the path to Universal Health Coverage (UHC), procedural fairness matters alongside substantive fairness. Decision systems should be assessed using a complete conception of procedural fairness that embodies core commitments to impartial and equal consideration of interests and perspectives. These commitments demand that comprehensive information is gathered and disclosed and that justifications for policies are publicly debated; that participation in decision-making is enabled; and that these characteristics of the decision system are institutionalised rather than up to the good will of decision-makers. Procedural fairness can improve equity in outcomes, raise legitimacy and trust, and can help make reforms last. While improving procedural fairness can be costly and there are barriers to achieving it, the range of instruments that countries at varying levels of income and institutional capacity have used with some success shows that, in many contexts, advances in procedural fairness in health financing are possible and worthwhile.

开放和包容的实践:全民健康覆盖筹资的公平进程。
我们总结世界银行报告《开放和包容:全民健康覆盖筹资的公平进程》的主要信息。《报告》的一个核心教训是,在实现全民健康覆盖的决策过程中,程序公平与实质公平同样重要。应该用程序公平的完整概念来评估决策系统,这个概念体现了公正和平等地考虑利益和观点的核心承诺。这些承诺要求收集和披露全面的信息,并公开辩论政策的理由;使参与决策成为可能;决策系统的这些特征是制度化的,而不是取决于决策者的善意。程序公平可以改善结果的公平性,提高合法性和信任度,并有助于使改革持续下去。虽然改善程序公平可能代价高昂,而且在实现这一目标方面存在障碍,但不同收入水平和机构能力的国家所使用的一系列工具取得了一些成功,这表明,在许多情况下,在卫生筹资程序公平方面取得进展是可能的,也是值得的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Economics Policy and Law
Health Economics Policy and Law HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: International trends highlight the confluence of economics, politics and legal considerations in the health policy process. Health Economics, Policy and Law serves as a forum for scholarship on health policy issues from these perspectives, and is of use to academics, policy makers and health care managers and professionals. HEPL is international in scope, publishes both theoretical and applied work, and contains articles on all aspects of health policy. Considerable emphasis is placed on rigorous conceptual development and analysis, and on the presentation of empirical evidence that is relevant to the policy process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信