Systematic Review of Effects of Medication Dispenser Use by Home-Dwelling Older Adults.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Olli Salmensuu, Virva Hyttinen-Huotari, Jenni Isotalo, Mieke Rijken, Ismo Linnosmaa, Minna Kaarakainen
{"title":"Systematic Review of Effects of Medication Dispenser Use by Home-Dwelling Older Adults.","authors":"Olli Salmensuu, Virva Hyttinen-Huotari, Jenni Isotalo, Mieke Rijken, Ismo Linnosmaa, Minna Kaarakainen","doi":"10.1097/NNR.0000000000000824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Population aging has increased the need for solutions that help older adults live independently in their own homes, where medication management is a major challenge.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In this systematic review, we assessed the effects of medication dispensers among home-dwelling older adults on outcomes within the five domains of the Quintuple Aim framework: user experiences, health and well-being outcomes, health service utilization and costs, care professional experiences, and equity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified relevant studies by searching databases (Scopus, CENTRAL, PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Reviews) from January 2017 to April 2022 with a predefined search strategy and two-person abstract and full-text screening. Two authors extracted the most relevant data and assessed quality for each included study. We assessed the evidence using a four-level quality rating measure: strong, moderate, limited, or no evidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included five original studies and three systematic reviews, which provided information on 20 additional original studies. Data were extracted from these 25 original studies. We found significant results in 16 of them, mostly pointing to beneficial effects of dispenser devices. Significant results for health and well-being outcomes were found in 13 out of 21 studies in which these were assessed, for service utilization in two out of five studies, for costs in two out of three studies, and for patient/carer experiences in one out of five studies. No study evaluated professional experiences or equity outcomes. Overall, strong evidence of a beneficial effect of dispenser devices in any outcome is lacking, but they can improve health outcomes (moderate evidence of beneficial effects of using dispenser devices on systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and hemoglobin A1c levels). For other outcome domains, there is no or only limited evidence for beneficial effects of dispenser devices.Discussion: We found that the use of dispenser devices by home-dwelling older adults can improve clinical health outcomes and may reduce health service utilization and costs. More high-quality research is needed to get a better insight into their effects on service utilization and costs. Future studies should also examine the effects on care professionals' experiences and equity.</p>","PeriodicalId":49723,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0000000000000824","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Population aging has increased the need for solutions that help older adults live independently in their own homes, where medication management is a major challenge.

Objectives: In this systematic review, we assessed the effects of medication dispensers among home-dwelling older adults on outcomes within the five domains of the Quintuple Aim framework: user experiences, health and well-being outcomes, health service utilization and costs, care professional experiences, and equity.

Methods: We identified relevant studies by searching databases (Scopus, CENTRAL, PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Reviews) from January 2017 to April 2022 with a predefined search strategy and two-person abstract and full-text screening. Two authors extracted the most relevant data and assessed quality for each included study. We assessed the evidence using a four-level quality rating measure: strong, moderate, limited, or no evidence.

Results: We included five original studies and three systematic reviews, which provided information on 20 additional original studies. Data were extracted from these 25 original studies. We found significant results in 16 of them, mostly pointing to beneficial effects of dispenser devices. Significant results for health and well-being outcomes were found in 13 out of 21 studies in which these were assessed, for service utilization in two out of five studies, for costs in two out of three studies, and for patient/carer experiences in one out of five studies. No study evaluated professional experiences or equity outcomes. Overall, strong evidence of a beneficial effect of dispenser devices in any outcome is lacking, but they can improve health outcomes (moderate evidence of beneficial effects of using dispenser devices on systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and hemoglobin A1c levels). For other outcome domains, there is no or only limited evidence for beneficial effects of dispenser devices.Discussion: We found that the use of dispenser devices by home-dwelling older adults can improve clinical health outcomes and may reduce health service utilization and costs. More high-quality research is needed to get a better insight into their effects on service utilization and costs. Future studies should also examine the effects on care professionals' experiences and equity.

老年人居家用药分配器使用效果的系统评价。
背景:人口老龄化增加了对帮助老年人在自己家中独立生活的解决方案的需求,其中药物管理是一个主要挑战。目的:在这篇系统综述中,我们评估了居家老年人中药物分配器对“五重目标”框架五个领域结果的影响:用户体验、健康和福祉结果、卫生服务利用和成本、护理专业经验和公平性。方法:我们使用预定义的搜索策略和两人摘要和全文筛选,从2017年1月至2022年4月检索数据库(Scopus、CENTRAL、PubMed、Web of Science、CINAHL、PsycINFO和Cochrane Reviews),确定相关研究。两位作者提取了最相关的数据,并评估了每个纳入研究的质量。我们使用四个级别的质量评价指标来评估证据:强证据、中等证据、有限证据或无证据。结果:我们纳入了5项原始研究和3项系统综述,提供了另外20项原始研究的信息。数据来自这25项原始研究。我们在其中16个案例中发现了显著的结果,其中大部分都指向了分配器设备的有益效果。在对健康和福祉结果进行评估的21项研究中,有13项研究发现了重大结果,5项研究中有2项发现了重大结果,3项研究中有2项发现了重大结果,5项研究中有1项发现了重大结果。没有研究评估专业经验或公平结果。总体而言,缺乏强有力的证据表明分配器装置对任何结果都有有益的影响,但它们可以改善健康结果(使用分配器装置对收缩压和舒张压以及血红蛋白A1c水平有有益的影响的中度证据)。对于其他结果领域,没有或只有有限的证据表明分配器设备的有益效果。讨论:我们发现居家老年人使用分配器设备可以改善临床健康结果,并可能降低卫生服务的利用率和成本。需要进行更多高质量的研究,以便更好地了解它们对服务利用和成本的影响。未来的研究还应该检查对护理专业人员的经验和公平的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nursing Research
Nursing Research 医学-护理
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
102
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Research is a peer-reviewed journal celebrating over 60 years as the most sought-after nursing resource; it offers more depth, more detail, and more of what today''s nurses demand. Nursing Research covers key issues, including health promotion, human responses to illness, acute care nursing research, symptom management, cost-effectiveness, vulnerable populations, health services, and community-based nursing studies. Each issue highlights the latest research techniques, quantitative and qualitative studies, and new state-of-the-art methodological strategies, including information not yet found in textbooks. Expert commentaries and briefs are also included. In addition to 6 issues per year, Nursing Research from time to time publishes supplemental content not found anywhere else.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信