Noninferiority of coiling versus coiling with particles in middle meningeal artery embolization: A technical note and case series.

Ryan W Sindewald, Arvin R Wali, Nikhil K Murthy, Michael G Brandel, Jeffrey A Steinberg, Jeffrey S Pannell, Alexander A Khalessi, David R Santiago-Dieppa
{"title":"Noninferiority of coiling versus coiling with particles in middle meningeal artery embolization: A technical note and case series.","authors":"Ryan W Sindewald, Arvin R Wali, Nikhil K Murthy, Michael G Brandel, Jeffrey A Steinberg, Jeffrey S Pannell, Alexander A Khalessi, David R Santiago-Dieppa","doi":"10.7461/jcen.2025.E2024.07.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the possibility of using coils as a standalone treatment for middle meningeal artery embolization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four patients (3 females, 1 male, median age 77.5) with bilateral subdural hematomas were treated with bilateral MMA embolization. One hematoma of each patient was treated with coils and PVA, and the other was treated exclusively with coils. New or resolved symptoms, radiographic imaging demonstrating hematoma change, and complications were recorded and compared between the two treatment modalities. Minimum follow-up time was three months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients demonstrated symptomatic and radiographic improvement at three month follow-up. None of the patients in this cohort received surgical evacuation of the hematoma prior to or after embolization. One patient had previously been treated for hydrocephalus with a VP shunt. There were no postoperative complications. In the hematomas treated with a combination of coils and particles, three showed complete resolution with one showing interval improvement on imaging. All hematomas treated with coils alone demonstrated complete resolution after three months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Middle meningeal artery embolization with coils alone has demonstrated noninferior results to embolization with a combination of particle embolisate and coils in this small cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":94072,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cerebrovascular and endovascular neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cerebrovascular and endovascular neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7461/jcen.2025.E2024.07.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the possibility of using coils as a standalone treatment for middle meningeal artery embolization.

Methods: Four patients (3 females, 1 male, median age 77.5) with bilateral subdural hematomas were treated with bilateral MMA embolization. One hematoma of each patient was treated with coils and PVA, and the other was treated exclusively with coils. New or resolved symptoms, radiographic imaging demonstrating hematoma change, and complications were recorded and compared between the two treatment modalities. Minimum follow-up time was three months.

Results: All patients demonstrated symptomatic and radiographic improvement at three month follow-up. None of the patients in this cohort received surgical evacuation of the hematoma prior to or after embolization. One patient had previously been treated for hydrocephalus with a VP shunt. There were no postoperative complications. In the hematomas treated with a combination of coils and particles, three showed complete resolution with one showing interval improvement on imaging. All hematomas treated with coils alone demonstrated complete resolution after three months.

Conclusions: Middle meningeal artery embolization with coils alone has demonstrated noninferior results to embolization with a combination of particle embolisate and coils in this small cohort.

在脑膜中动脉栓塞术中,卷绕术与颗粒卷绕术的非劣效性:技术说明和病例系列。
目的:探讨线圈单独治疗脑膜中动脉栓塞的可能性。方法:采用双侧MMA栓塞治疗双侧硬膜下血肿4例(女3例,男1例,中位年龄77.5岁)。每例患者1例血肿用线圈和PVA治疗,另1例只用线圈治疗。记录新的或缓解的症状、显示血肿改变的x线影像和并发症,并比较两种治疗方式。最短随访时间为3个月。结果:所有患者在随访3个月时均表现出症状和影像学改善。在这个队列中,没有患者在栓塞之前或之后接受手术清除血肿。其中一名患者曾接受过VP分流术治疗脑积水。无术后并发症。在用线圈和颗粒联合治疗的血肿中,3例显示完全分辨率,1例显示成像间隔改善。三个月后,所有血肿均完全消退。结论:在这个小队列中,单独使用线圈栓塞的中脑膜动脉的效果优于颗粒栓塞和线圈联合栓塞。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信