Liam Knox, Rachel Rahman, Gareth Norris, Carol-Anne Davies, Sam Rice, Kim Littlemore, Claire Hurlin, Keir Lewis
{"title":"Understanding the impact of COPD and self-management interventions: a self-determination theory perspective.","authors":"Liam Knox, Rachel Rahman, Gareth Norris, Carol-Anne Davies, Sam Rice, Kim Littlemore, Claire Hurlin, Keir Lewis","doi":"10.1080/13548506.2025.2487226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>People with COPD (pwCOPD) experience a range of daily living limitations caused by breathlessness, which can affect their quality of life and physical and mental health. There are approximately 1.2 million pwCOPD in the UK. Two common behavioural interventions are self-management support and pulmonary rehabilitation, which support pwCOPD to exercise and adopt techniques to decrease their symptoms; however, adherence to these can be poor. This study aimed to understand whether these two different interventions can affect motivational concepts and explore how pwCOPD experience their condition and these interventions. This study used a mixed-method design. Participants were allocated to receive either: pulmonary rehabilitation and PocketMedic (a self-management intervention), only PocketMedic, or only pulmonary rehabilitation. Questionnaires measuring self-determination theory motivational concepts were completed at baseline and seven weeks. Semi-structured interviews were conducted and analysed using Reflexive Thematic Analysis. 53 participants were recruited to the three conditions. An ANOVA found no statistically significant differences between the groups for any of the questionnaires, which may be related to the low sample size. However, when the research condition was held constant, significant improvements were identified for competence satisfaction (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and relatedness satisfaction (<i>p</i> < 0.05) and autonomy frustration (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and competence frustration (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Seven participants from the PocketMedic conditions were interviewed. Overarching themes described the participants' experiences and adaptations to psychological need frustration, and how the interventions facilitated basic psychological need satisfaction. This study suggests that pulmonary rehabilitation and PocketMedic can improve basic psychological need satisfaction and frustration; however, there were no cumulative affects when the interventions were combined. Need frustration is important to consider in research on long-term conditions. The qualitative analysis provides greater knowledge on mechanisms by which healthcare interventions have been shown to be effective. Further research is needed including larger and more diverse samples to enable complete generalisability.</p>","PeriodicalId":54535,"journal":{"name":"Psychology Health & Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"2094-2112"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology Health & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2025.2487226","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
People with COPD (pwCOPD) experience a range of daily living limitations caused by breathlessness, which can affect their quality of life and physical and mental health. There are approximately 1.2 million pwCOPD in the UK. Two common behavioural interventions are self-management support and pulmonary rehabilitation, which support pwCOPD to exercise and adopt techniques to decrease their symptoms; however, adherence to these can be poor. This study aimed to understand whether these two different interventions can affect motivational concepts and explore how pwCOPD experience their condition and these interventions. This study used a mixed-method design. Participants were allocated to receive either: pulmonary rehabilitation and PocketMedic (a self-management intervention), only PocketMedic, or only pulmonary rehabilitation. Questionnaires measuring self-determination theory motivational concepts were completed at baseline and seven weeks. Semi-structured interviews were conducted and analysed using Reflexive Thematic Analysis. 53 participants were recruited to the three conditions. An ANOVA found no statistically significant differences between the groups for any of the questionnaires, which may be related to the low sample size. However, when the research condition was held constant, significant improvements were identified for competence satisfaction (p < 0.001) and relatedness satisfaction (p < 0.05) and autonomy frustration (p < 0.001) and competence frustration (p < 0.05). Seven participants from the PocketMedic conditions were interviewed. Overarching themes described the participants' experiences and adaptations to psychological need frustration, and how the interventions facilitated basic psychological need satisfaction. This study suggests that pulmonary rehabilitation and PocketMedic can improve basic psychological need satisfaction and frustration; however, there were no cumulative affects when the interventions were combined. Need frustration is important to consider in research on long-term conditions. The qualitative analysis provides greater knowledge on mechanisms by which healthcare interventions have been shown to be effective. Further research is needed including larger and more diverse samples to enable complete generalisability.
慢性阻塞性肺病(pwCOPD)患者经历由呼吸困难引起的一系列日常生活限制,这可能影响他们的生活质量和身心健康。在英国大约有120万慢性阻塞性肺病患者。两种常见的行为干预措施是自我管理支持和肺部康复,这两种干预措施支持慢性阻塞性肺病患者进行锻炼并采取技术来减轻症状;然而,坚持这些可能会很差。本研究旨在了解这两种不同的干预措施是否会影响动机概念,并探讨pwCOPD如何经历其病情和这些干预措施。本研究采用混合方法设计。参与者被分配接受肺康复和PocketMedic(一种自我管理干预),只接受PocketMedic,或只接受肺康复。测量自我决定理论动机概念的问卷在基线和第7周完成。采用反身性主题分析进行半结构化访谈,共招募了53名参与者。方差分析发现,在任何问卷调查中,各组之间没有统计学上的显著差异,这可能与低样本量有关。然而,当研究条件保持不变时,能力满意度显著提高(p p p p)
期刊介绍:
Psychology, Health & Medicine is a multidisciplinary journal highlighting human factors in health. The journal provides a peer reviewed forum to report on issues of psychology and health in practice. This key publication reaches an international audience, highlighting the variation and similarities within different settings and exploring multiple health and illness issues from theoretical, practical and management perspectives. It provides a critical forum to examine the wide range of applied health and illness issues and how they incorporate psychological knowledge, understanding, theory and intervention. The journal reflects the growing recognition of psychosocial issues as they affect health planning, medical care, disease reaction, intervention, quality of life, adjustment adaptation and management.
For many years theoretical research was very distant from applied understanding. The emerging movement in health psychology, changes in medical care provision and training, and consumer awareness of health issues all contribute to a growing need for applied research. This journal focuses on practical applications of theory, research and experience and provides a bridge between academic knowledge, illness experience, wellbeing and health care practice.