Genetic aetiologies in relation to response to the ketogenic diet in 226 children with epilepsy.

IF 4.1 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Brain communications Pub Date : 2025-04-05 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/braincomms/fcaf134
Maria Dahlin, Tommy Stödberg, Elin Ekman, Virpi Töhönen, Anna Wedell
{"title":"Genetic aetiologies in relation to response to the ketogenic diet in 226 children with epilepsy.","authors":"Maria Dahlin, Tommy Stödberg, Elin Ekman, Virpi Töhönen, Anna Wedell","doi":"10.1093/braincomms/fcaf134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A ketogenic diet is used in children with drug-resistant epilepsy but predictors for efficacy are largely lacking. Our aim was to evaluate if causative genetic variants could predict seizure response to the ketogenic diet. A cohort study of 226 children with refractory epilepsy and classic ketogenic diet treatment for at least 3 months (76.9% of the 294 who started) was performed. The median age at diet start was 5.1 years (range 0.1-17.8), 118 were girls and 108 boys. They had previous trials of a median of 6.0 anti-seizure medications (range 0-12) and intellectual disability was found in 87%. Seizure response (≥50% reduction) was found in 138/226 patients (61.1%) at 3 months, 121 (53.5%) at 6 months, 107 (47.3%) at 1 year and in 80 (37.0%) at 2 years follow-up of ketogenic diet. Age of epilepsy onset was lower and combined epilepsy type less common in responders compared to non-responders but no differences were found for specific seizure types, ketogenic ratio or beta-hydroxybutyric acid blood levels. A causative pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant was detected in 107/153 = 69.9% in 48 different genes. Next generation sequencing was used in 91/226 (40%) cases with a diagnostic yield of 58.2% (53/91). In comparison with cases without a revealed genetic aetiology, patients with a causative genetic variant had less atonic seizures and epileptic spasms and a better seizure response with 17.3% seizure free and 25% with >90% seizure reduction at 2-year follow-up. Causative variants in <i>SLC2A1</i>, <i>SCN1A</i>, <i>STXBP1</i> and <i>PAFAH1B1</i> showed significant diet response (<i>P</i> < 0.05) and good efficacy was also associated with <i>DEPDC5</i>, <i>GLDC</i>, <i>KCNT1</i>, <i>PDHA1</i>, <i>SLC25A12</i> and <i>TSC1</i>. Causative variants in <i>COL4A1</i> and <i>DYNC1H1</i> were among genes linked to a lack of response. To our knowledge not described previously, we report a good ketogenic diet response related to causative variants in <i>CSNK2A1</i>, <i>FARS2</i>, <i>GABRB3</i>, <i>GRIN1</i>, <i>KCNA2</i>, <i>KCTD3</i>, <i>STX1B</i> and <i>SLC16A2</i> but a lack of response for causative variants in <i>CLN5</i>, <i>GLI3</i>, <i>MACF1</i>, <i>MAGEL2</i>, <i>NANS</i>, <i>NEMO/IKBKG</i>, <i>RORB</i>, <i>SLC17A5</i> and <i>UFSP2.</i> After grouping of genes into functional groups, causative variants in transporter genes had the best response (<i>P</i> = 0.009) and variants in other membrane-related proteins (ion channels and neurotransmitter receptors) also showed good efficacy. However, the gene group related to cell structural integrity and/or homeostasis had the worst diet response (<i>P</i> = 0.00006). In conclusion, our results support that causative genetic variants may be used as prognostic markers of ketogenic diet response, constituting an example in the expanding area of precision medicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":93915,"journal":{"name":"Brain communications","volume":"7 2","pages":"fcaf134"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12022961/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcaf134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A ketogenic diet is used in children with drug-resistant epilepsy but predictors for efficacy are largely lacking. Our aim was to evaluate if causative genetic variants could predict seizure response to the ketogenic diet. A cohort study of 226 children with refractory epilepsy and classic ketogenic diet treatment for at least 3 months (76.9% of the 294 who started) was performed. The median age at diet start was 5.1 years (range 0.1-17.8), 118 were girls and 108 boys. They had previous trials of a median of 6.0 anti-seizure medications (range 0-12) and intellectual disability was found in 87%. Seizure response (≥50% reduction) was found in 138/226 patients (61.1%) at 3 months, 121 (53.5%) at 6 months, 107 (47.3%) at 1 year and in 80 (37.0%) at 2 years follow-up of ketogenic diet. Age of epilepsy onset was lower and combined epilepsy type less common in responders compared to non-responders but no differences were found for specific seizure types, ketogenic ratio or beta-hydroxybutyric acid blood levels. A causative pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant was detected in 107/153 = 69.9% in 48 different genes. Next generation sequencing was used in 91/226 (40%) cases with a diagnostic yield of 58.2% (53/91). In comparison with cases without a revealed genetic aetiology, patients with a causative genetic variant had less atonic seizures and epileptic spasms and a better seizure response with 17.3% seizure free and 25% with >90% seizure reduction at 2-year follow-up. Causative variants in SLC2A1, SCN1A, STXBP1 and PAFAH1B1 showed significant diet response (P < 0.05) and good efficacy was also associated with DEPDC5, GLDC, KCNT1, PDHA1, SLC25A12 and TSC1. Causative variants in COL4A1 and DYNC1H1 were among genes linked to a lack of response. To our knowledge not described previously, we report a good ketogenic diet response related to causative variants in CSNK2A1, FARS2, GABRB3, GRIN1, KCNA2, KCTD3, STX1B and SLC16A2 but a lack of response for causative variants in CLN5, GLI3, MACF1, MAGEL2, NANS, NEMO/IKBKG, RORB, SLC17A5 and UFSP2. After grouping of genes into functional groups, causative variants in transporter genes had the best response (P = 0.009) and variants in other membrane-related proteins (ion channels and neurotransmitter receptors) also showed good efficacy. However, the gene group related to cell structural integrity and/or homeostasis had the worst diet response (P = 0.00006). In conclusion, our results support that causative genetic variants may be used as prognostic markers of ketogenic diet response, constituting an example in the expanding area of precision medicine.

226例癫痫患儿对生酮饮食反应的遗传病因分析。
生酮饮食用于耐药癫痫患儿,但其疗效的预测指标在很大程度上缺乏。我们的目的是评估致病基因变异是否可以预测对生酮饮食的癫痫反应。对226例顽固性癫痫患儿进行了一项队列研究,这些患儿接受了至少3个月的经典生酮饮食治疗(294例患者中的76.9%)。饮食开始时的中位年龄为5.1岁(0.1-17.8岁),其中118名女孩和108名男孩。他们之前的抗癫痫药物试验中位数为6.0(范围0-12),87%的人发现智力残疾。在生酮饮食随访3个月时,138/226例患者(61.1%)癫痫发作缓解(≥50%),6个月时121例(53.5%),1年时107例(47.3%),2年时80例(37.0%)。与无反应者相比,反应者癫痫发作年龄更低,合并癫痫类型更少,但在特定癫痫发作类型、生酮比或β -羟基丁酸血水平方面没有发现差异。48个不同基因中有107/153 = 69.9%检出致病/可能致病变异。下一代测序在91/226(40%)例中使用,诊断率为58.2%(53/91)。与未发现遗传病因的病例相比,具有致病基因变异的患者在2年随访中无癫痫发作17.3%,无癫痫发作25%,癫痫发作减少90%,无癫痫发作较少,癫痫发作反应更好。SLC2A1、SCN1A、STXBP1和PAFAH1B1的致病变异对饮食有显著的反应(P < 0.05),而DEPDC5、GLDC、KCNT1、PDHA1、SLC25A12和TSC1也有良好的疗效。COL4A1和DYNC1H1的致病变异是与缺乏反应相关的基因之一。据我们所知,我们报告了与CSNK2A1、FARS2、GABRB3、GRIN1、KCNA2、KCTD3、STX1B和SLC16A2致病变异相关的良好生酮饮食反应,但对CLN5、GLI3、MACF1、MAGEL2、NANS、NEMO/IKBKG、RORB、SLC17A5和UFSP2致病变异缺乏反应。将基因分为功能组后,转运基因的致病变异反应最佳(P = 0.009),其他膜相关蛋白(离子通道和神经递质受体)的变异也表现出良好的疗效。然而,与细胞结构完整性和/或体内平衡相关的基因组对饮食的反应最差(P = 0.00006)。总之,我们的研究结果支持致病基因变异可以作为生酮饮食反应的预后标记物,为不断扩大的精准医学领域提供了一个例子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信